[NB: check the byline, thanks. /~Rayne]
Ever since I found the AP Newsroom site where AP photographers upload their work, I’ve been following the presidential candidates’ campaigns through photos.
There’s something freakishly unsettling about JD Vance in these image collections.
First, let me show you a Voice of America post from Mastodon – VOA generally does straight reporting, not prone to leaning one way or the other which is appropriate for news media funded by U.S. taxpayers.
Note the two photos used in this post are fairly typical campaign material from a manufacturing facility; the photos are from the AP.
Thinking I’d take a closer look at the plant and its location in the AP Newroom feed, I did a search for “JD Vance” and scrolled through the results.
Those two photos VOA used are rather misleading, because that’s about it – what you see in those two photos are nearly the extent of the campaign appearance.
Look at this photo from the same event:
Here’s another angle of the same event:
There’s a couple rows of employees behind Vance and a bank of reporters and cameras in front of Vance.
That’s it.
There’s a void where the crowd of campaign rally attendees should be. Vance is speaking into cameras and nothing else. If you’ve attended campaign rallies including those held at manufacturing facilities, you already know there’s usually a crowd of employees and guests to which the candidate speaks. The press operates from the back of the crowd or on an elevated platform so they are able to get good crowd reaction coverage while not obstructing rally attendees’ view of the candidate.
That wasn’t the case in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, at this manufacturing facility’s campaign event.
How weird.
I scrolled back through the photos for “JD Vance” and I noticed there are zero, nada, no crowd shots for other recent events.
None.
Vance is trying to precede or follow the Harris-Walz campaign’s tour through swing states, like some stalker-y ex-boyfriend. It makes sense there’d be photos in AP Newsroom collection featuring the two campaigns in the same destinations regardless of Vance’s creepy campaign-by-stalking.
Except the photos of Vance are like Potemkin villages, all fronts and nothing back end behind the façade.
Here’s one of Vance speaking at the police department in Shelby Township, Michigan. The site is about a hour’s drive away from Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (DTW), located in the white flight portion of the greater Detroit Metro area:
Where are the people who came to see Vance? There are more photos of Vance in Romulus but they’re all similarly void of a visible audience.
Compare and contrast to the Harris-Walz campaign rally held at DTW:
Note where this photo was taken from within the site – the back edge of the crowd. There’s overflow outside this hangar at the airport. My god, there’s a crowd, even before Harris and Walz disembark from the plane!
This isn’t fair, you might say; this is a combined event with Harris and Walz and not Walz alone so I’m unfairly comparing apples and an orange dude’s veep choice. But it’s early yet for Walz to have his own campaign events; he’ll finish the swing state series before he’s appearing on his own.
This still doesn’t explain the void where Vance appears, the lack of a crowd in attendance.
There’s chatter about Vance pulling a stunt on the tarmac, approaching Air Force 2 while remarking it’s his future plane.
Except this stunt had no audience, just reporters and photographers who don’t appear in the images.
Worse, the photos are meme-worthy for the lack of an audience – like this wisecrack about Vance and his entourage:
Who would want to hear this guy speak when he and his portion of the Trump-Vance campaign lack the awareness necessary to appear less weird and creepy and more human?
I have to ask, though: is the Trump-Vance campaign throttling photographers from taking photos of anything besides Vance at Vance’s campaign events? Are we seeing just the opposite – an awareness their faux hillbilly is awkward and as competent at public speaking as a sixth-grade student? Have they stripped away the crowds to avoid problematic interactions?
With or without a crowd, the answers don’t look good. Creepy and weird, even.