The Future of Work Part 2: The View From the White House
A future dominated by Artificial Intelligence is going to bring a whole lot of “disruption” and “market adjustments”. Guess who gets hurt the most.
Notre Dame undergrad (math); JD, Indiana University at Bloomington; 1st Lieutenant, US Army.; private practice in corporate and securities law; Assistant AG in Tennessee for consumer protection and securities; Blue Sky Securities Commissioner, Tennessee; private practice, bankruptcy and corporate law.
I have had a lifelong interest in economics. For most of my career, that interest was practical, focused on the problems in front of me. Lately I have been more interested in economics as a theory, especially its impact on the lives of people like those I met in my bankruptcy practice, and on the politics of money in the US. I also enjoy reading philosophers, starting in college and steadily expanding my reading ever since. I wrote at FireDogLake for a number of years.
Generally, I think the problem facing the US is the dominance of neoliberal discourse. I think it clouds the vision, and limits the kinds of problems that can be identified and solved. For example, the existence and danger of climate change can easily be identified in a scientific discussion. However, the problem does not fit the neoliberal discourse because science insists that the pursuit of individual and corporate self-interest will lead to devastation. In neoliberal discourse, the pursuit of self-interest always leads to Eden.
The neoliberal project has two prongs. One is the police function of crushing dissent and alternative views. The police function is provided by government agencies and private and institutional actors. The counterpart is the economic system , which is operated by government and by private and institutional actors. Some of these actors operate in both spheres. I focus on the second prong.
A future dominated by Artificial Intelligence is going to bring a whole lot of “disruption” and “market adjustments”. Guess who gets hurt the most.
If work is a curse, why shouldn’t we set a goal of getting rid of it?
Conservative thinkers are happy to ride to power on the coattails of those who distort the national discourse with lies, crackpot ideas and conspiracy theories.
Let the Trump voters hang out together. You don’t have to be anywhere near them.
A brief look at the implications of Foucault’s concept of pastoral power in Western governments, and a new direction in the wake of the election.
The focus of Security, Territory and Population is power as exercised by government. In a Novermber 1980 interview, Foucault discussed his thoughts on power informally.
We left the country to get away from this stupid election campaign. It’s everywhere.
One of the great pleasures of travel is long uninterrupted stretches of time for reading. I’m on the road for a long trip, including a visit to Russia, and took a copy of War and Peace with me. It’s really long, and therefore perfect for this kind of travel, and I was able to read […]
In the fourth lecture in Security, Territory and Population, Michel Foucault introduces the idea of governmentality. He begins this lecture with a discussion of the change in the idea of governing that began in the 16th Century, when writers of the day began saying that the word covers a number of different relationships. There is […]
The third lecture by Michel Foucault in Security, Territory and Population begins with a discussion of the systems of law and discipline considered from the standpoint of “norms”. In the system of law, norms are the acceptable behaviors,derived from sacred texts or societal customs or the will of the sovereign. They are then codified and […]