On Pierre Bourdieu Part 3: Habitus
One of Bourdieu’s central ideas is habitus, which explains how people participate in the competition for scarce resources of economic, social and cultural capital.
Notre Dame undergrad (math); JD, Indiana University at Bloomington; 1st Lieutenant, US Army.; private practice in corporate and securities law; Assistant AG in Tennessee for consumer protection and securities; Blue Sky Securities Commissioner, Tennessee; private practice, bankruptcy and corporate law.
I have had a lifelong interest in economics. For most of my career, that interest was practical, focused on the problems in front of me. Lately I have been more interested in economics as a theory, especially its impact on the lives of people like those I met in my bankruptcy practice, and on the politics of money in the US. I also enjoy reading philosophers, starting in college and steadily expanding my reading ever since. I wrote at FireDogLake for a number of years.
Generally, I think the problem facing the US is the dominance of neoliberal discourse. I think it clouds the vision, and limits the kinds of problems that can be identified and solved. For example, the existence and danger of climate change can easily be identified in a scientific discussion. However, the problem does not fit the neoliberal discourse because science insists that the pursuit of individual and corporate self-interest will lead to devastation. In neoliberal discourse, the pursuit of self-interest always leads to Eden.
The neoliberal project has two prongs. One is the police function of crushing dissent and alternative views. The police function is provided by government agencies and private and institutional actors. The counterpart is the economic system , which is operated by government and by private and institutional actors. Some of these actors operate in both spheres. I focus on the second prong.
One of Bourdieu’s central ideas is habitus, which explains how people participate in the competition for scarce resources of economic, social and cultural capital.
Society is operated through institutions wielding power. It’s morally wrong and disgusting when the people who get that power use it for their personal gain.
Societies are organized to reproduce existing systems of dominance. This benefits the elites at the expense of the rest of us.
A new vocabulary for a new book.
My Top Ten posts from emptywheel’s first decade
No thought leaders. No David Brooks.
Control the capitalists or they control you.
Neoliberal theories are great for elites but they are cruel to the rest of us, and they make us worse people.
Corporations are the perfect person in neoliberal theory. The elites see themselves as the best because they were selected by the market, Naturally they should rule the world.
The Phillips Curve isn’t working, but it’s still being used. The concept is gone. Only the formula is left.