Democracy Against Capitalism: Base, Superstructure and More Definitions
Definitions matter even when the terms are dismissed.
Notre Dame undergrad (math); JD, Indiana University at Bloomington; 1st Lieutenant, US Army.; private practice in corporate and securities law; Assistant AG in Tennessee for consumer protection and securities; Blue Sky Securities Commissioner, Tennessee; private practice, bankruptcy and corporate law.
I have had a lifelong interest in economics. For most of my career, that interest was practical, focused on the problems in front of me. Lately I have been more interested in economics as a theory, especially its impact on the lives of people like those I met in my bankruptcy practice, and on the politics of money in the US. I also enjoy reading philosophers, starting in college and steadily expanding my reading ever since. I wrote at FireDogLake for a number of years.
Generally, I think the problem facing the US is the dominance of neoliberal discourse. I think it clouds the vision, and limits the kinds of problems that can be identified and solved. For example, the existence and danger of climate change can easily be identified in a scientific discussion. However, the problem does not fit the neoliberal discourse because science insists that the pursuit of individual and corporate self-interest will lead to devastation. In neoliberal discourse, the pursuit of self-interest always leads to Eden.
The neoliberal project has two prongs. One is the police function of crushing dissent and alternative views. The police function is provided by government agencies and private and institutional actors. The counterpart is the economic system , which is operated by government and by private and institutional actors. Some of these actors operate in both spheres. I focus on the second prong.
Definitions matter even when the terms are dismissed.
Every single person who carried out the inhuman policy of snatching children from their immigrant parents is complicit in a depraved policy.
In Democracy Against Capitalism the Marxist scholar Ellen Meiksins Wood says that the driving force of capitalism is the urgent desire to accumulate more capital. As we know, and not just from Marx, capitalist only expends capital in the expectation of profit, and generally can be counted on to invest capital if profit seems likely. […]
Owners of capital control production and extract all profits. It didn’t have to be that way.
Are wages set by markets or power?
Criticizing capitalism is slowly becoming fashionable. Marxists have been doing it forever.
How long will the majority consent to be governed by the minority?
Marx gave us tools to think about capitalism. Movement Conservatives gave us neoliberalism. Marx is still relevant. Conservatives aren’t
The Cultural Elites benefit from neoliberalism. Of course they don’t oppose it.
No one is responsible for the results of their actions on society. They just work here.