The ‘role’ of the FBI is, at its worst, and even at its best, is inconsequential in how it performs its “mission” and predicated on Public Polices, and as configured by federal legislation. And if you’re aware of a tad of history, in the 1960s and 1970s, COINTELPRO contained a ‘second level’ apprication and targeted Chicano and Native American military vets. And from my perspective, today’s dominate culture is predicated on the Romney Schematic of Self-Deportation, nonetheless.

Consequently, the Gangsters in Fancy Suits and Uniforms Affixed with Stars, exemplies today’s current political posture that supposedly enhances, and while reducing the reinforcing impact of “demographics.”

However, history is embliematic of the Chicano Movement’s (from 1985) is the Agenda of Unmet Needs. Take, for example, the following when it comes to any “politial risk analysis” is being contrasted with today’s “containment of Russia, China and Iran.” To wit, the following when “listening” to Chicanos Talking to Chicanos:

And as a gentle reminder, and starting with Jimmy Carter’s presidential era and familiar to us as the Peace Process and where America made a highly substantive effort to bring peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians, was not. Today, and in comparison, America abandoned this essential or critical effort, starting with the Ronald Reagan presidential era for nonsense, that being ‘trickle down economics.’

Back in 1985, the Chicano Movement issued its Agenda of Unmet Needs, and of the 10 issues addressed, was the Palestinian-Israeli Relationship, then being discussed as our public’s foreign policy behavior as per the Jimmy Carter Peace Process.

To wit, today’s over 7,000 Latino Elected and Appointed Officials have never wavered in their affirming behavior for the following:

1. A congressional resolution approved by both the House and Senate chambers and where, once signed by Senators McConnell and Schumer and with the signatures of Representatives Pelosi and McCarthy, this Formal Request would be submtted to the Genaral Assembly at the United Nations, for their consideration and adoption.

2. Once adopted by the General Assembly, the United Nations would establish a Border Commission that would define and design the geograhical boundaries, as per the intent of the Jimmy Carter Peace Process. And once completed via a street-by- street and neighborhood-by-neighbood basis, the results of this Commission, would be either accepted or rejected by a consequential vote of its members in the General Assembly.

3. Once adopted by the General Assembly, the General Assembly would require that three elements be included. First, respective voters among Palestinians and Israelis, would take place at the ballot box during the course of each’s nation’s next general election cycle.. Second, if either respective society rejected such at the ballot box, the respective nation would no longer have access to the United Nations, as well as the United States. Third, if approved by the respective nations, each nation would have to establish a political vehicle that “guarantees” the national security and self-defense of each of these respective sovereign nations. Thusly, the subjective requirement that Israel would guarantee the political viability of Palestine and conversely, Palestine would guarantee the political viability of Israel. And in in doing so, each state would insure that the political interference from the surrounding nation-states would be widely diminished and possibly to the point of being deemed unacceptable.
And how can this be accomplished?

Of course the next Democratic-oriented President could conceivably issue her National Request to the General Assembly at the United Nations. And the alternative is to have this National Request via Congressional Resolution being embodied with the signatures of the House chamber’s Nancy Pelosi and the Senate chamber’s, Mitch McConnell.

And to solidify this view, the ‘demographics’ here in our nation, hence, in 20 years or so, will evolve and where this National Request, becomes a mere formality and premised on Common Sense.

In the meantime, we will continue to adddress the discourse that currently exists between the Palestinians and the Israelis.

My deepest respect in providing this observation. In this thread user “Rugger 9” used a witty synonym to describe the 43 President of the United States commonly know as George W. Bush. Said user wrote: “as was seen in the Shrub White House is something.”

Surly I don’t need to spell out the joke, which I found quite funny and had planned on using. In my view, which understand means little, a distasteful misspelling of a persons name, as was done by user “frank c. tripoli” when mocking Mr. Trump with the spelling “stumpy,” and the use of a witty synonym for a persons name have one comment element in that each seek to sully the character of the individual whose name is being cast in doubt.

It is therefore my observation, that some constancy should be applied in publicly reprimanding users for sullying the name of public office holders. I will now return to lurking.