Go Green,

““47% of the population of Oregon lives in the Portland metropolitan area as of 2013””.

It is probably nearer 57% now, 77% if they have incorporated Tigard-Hillsboro-to Salem into Portland, LosAngeles style, or 87% if they have incorporated to Eugene, or 97% if they have incorporated to Ashland now.

Why so much urbanity in a “Western Appalachia” state? Because the “green” have legislated ‘gasohol’, adding 10% alcohol to motor vehicle fuel, which increases the price of fuel, for the higher cost of making alcohol to add to the fuel (from food-crops, or higher-return alcohol-crops grown in lieu of food-crops), and which addition lowers the thermal efficiency of the resulting mix by about 19%, for which motor vehicles in Oregon use eleven gallons of gasoline, plus one of alcohol, for every ten gallons the same vehicles would use run on straight gasoline, for which the poor can no longer afford to be rural poor for being unable to afford to drive to town.

“The ACLU of Oregon has found that “black people are 600% more likely to be sentenced to prison than whites” in the Multnomah County/Portland area”

In Oregon, as everywhere else in the U.S. now, the Latinos are the Societal Darlings. For this the programs, benefits and encouragements that used to go to black people (and before them to poor whites; i don’t know why they always have to go to one group or another, instead of all the poor, struggling and de-franchized, you will have to ask a leaky-eyed-leek, maybe one of them running the state) are all going to Latinos now.

This new shift in dewey-focus, which left the poor whites nowhere to turn but to crime years ago, when they were shunted so focus could go to blacks, for which the poor white are established in crime. with, now, the poor blacks coming in below them with no one else to look to to help them. This being the post-2008 “trickle-down” United States, the poor white criminals of Oregon are ‘tricklling-down’ the crumbier crimes to the blacks below, just like is going on everywhere else in the U.S., and in every class, from banker and hedge gangsters on down (note that payday-lenders are anomalous, since they are ‘lending-down’, which is a hell different economic model from ‘trickle-down’) to the down-n-out. So it’s the black now who are getting the easy-to-catch street-crime gigs now.

Note that if Oregon’s percent of black incarceratti is significantly higher than national average it will mean a higher average of black charity, meaning more black teens saying, “Mamma, you got so many mouths to feed, and I got no more than a dead goat’s chance getting a job, I’m gonna go get busted into jail so the Man gotta at least do me my food and board.”

“[T]he chair of the political party that controls Oregon says “unpledged delegates exist really to make sure the party leaders and elected officials don’t have to be in a position where they are running against grassroots activists””

if you have reviewed Oregon Public Relation propaganda you know that Oregon prides itself on being “Out Front”, “A Leader” and all that sort of thing among what they call “Liberal” (no connection to ‘liberal’, a non-political word) states of the United States. If you have reviewed Oregon events and recent ‘history’ you should be aware that Oregon is so “Out” and “Out Front” that has a governor whose primary qualification is being asserted “Gay” (no connection to ‘gay’ meaning joyful), and who is (as yet at present) “The Only Appointed (non-elected) Governor” in the United States, having been appointed, apparently primarily for the aforesaid primary qualification of being “Gay”, following a Palace Revolution put forward by the State’s only state-wide (tabloid) newspaper and members of the state’s legislature after the said tabloid and its adherent revolutionaries had failed to prevent the re-election of a governor they did not want and had conducted a corruption-accusation (no proofs, only hysterics) campaign against the elected governor’s girlfriend (not the governor).

Why was the appointee-governor’s amoural gender-bias important at all, and, in fact, primary? Because the chance for “Out Front” and “Out” Oregon to sport the first “Gay” governor was the perfect blinder for the “Leeky” lot of the Oregon electorate, who were so enamoured by the idea of Oregon having a First Gay Governor that they did not recognize the Palace Revolution part of the equation, the replacement of a just-elected State Executive with a legislature- appointed one brought about by key legislators agreeing amongst each other to refuse to work together with the elected governor, and so dead-lock the Oregon government.

Is Oregon the “Leader” its Leeky acclaim it to be? Is the Oregon-Pattern for elected government replacement going to be replicated elsewhere? Would a “Green Sweep” benefit the bovinated electorate of Oregon (or anyone else)? Or would they better benefit from a “Shit Sweep”? Or maybe a Trump Sweep?