New York Times Comes Tantalizingly Close to Admitting “Training” in Iraq Doesn’t Work
![Never forget the ass-kissing little chickenshit who has been the driving force most failed training of Iraqi troops.](https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Petreaus-Army-recruiting-ad-300x166-300x166.jpg)
Never forget the ass-kissing little chickenshit who has been the driving force for most of the failed training of Iraqi troops.
The current, woeful state of the Iraqi military raises the question not so much of whether the Americans left too soon, but whether a new round of deployments for training will have any more effect than the last.
Yes, indeed. We already know that all of the previous rounds of training Iraqi troops failed miserably. That indisputable fact allows Nordland to pose the question of whether this new round of training could be expected to somehow be successful after all those failures. Since the article offers no description of any changes in strategy or methods in this new round of training, it’s hard to see how the answer is anything other than a strong probability that this round of training also will fail.
The catastrophic demise of Iraq’s forces is staggering with the numbers Nordland presents. At its peak, the Iraqi military numbered 280,000. And yet once ISIS advanced, the melting away of multiple whole divisions of troops whittled Iraq down to a force that perhaps was as low as only 50,000. This current training effort, being carried out by 3000 US forces, is expected to add, at best, 30,000 Iraqi troops. Nordland admits, however, that the number is likely to be “far fewer”. Despite this depressing math, Nordland doesn’t get around to pointing out just how little impact such a small increase in Iraqi forces is likely to have even if their training somehow turned out to be successful.
But don’t despair. Our intrepid Speaker of the House is on duty to make sure that we continue repeating our training failures:
Boehner blamed “artificial constraints” on the 4,500 American trainers and advisers to the Iraqi army, suggesting that a slight increase in U.S. troops could occur if the Pentagon’s commanders suggested they were needed to help direct fighting against Islamic State forces. “They’re only there to train and advise the Iraqi army, and the fact is it’s just that – training and advising,” he said, dismissing fears that his proposal would lead to tens of thousands of additional U.S. troops locked in another bloody ground war.
“There’s more that we can do, with limited risk, and it wouldn’t require that many more people,” the speaker said.
“Please,” Boehner seems to be saying, “Let’s get back to a full war in Iraq, but without calling it war.” Presumably because the last one worked out so well.
Postscript: Marcy has been the one tracking maneuvers around the issue of an AUMF (even as recently as yesterday), but the Boehner quote above comes from a larger article about a possible new Iraq AUMF. Boehner is fighting Obama’s proposed AUMF. But he’s fighting it because he doesn’t want Obama to give back some of the unlimited war powers of the Executive:
“Until the president gets serious about fighting the fight, until he has a strategy that makes sense, there’s no reason for us to give him less authority than what he has today, which is what he’s asking for,” Boehner told a group of reporters Tuesday, following his trip with lawmakers to several Middle East hot spots during the congressional recess.
Take that, Mr. President. We won’t give you authority for this war until you ask for even more unfettered power than we already grant you!
“..Boehner blamed “artificial constraints””
The latest version of the old ‘stabbed in the back theory’ favoured by warmongers everywhere. The war in Vietnam was lost because troops fought with both hands tied behind their backs etc etc.
Here Boehner is almost certainly suggesting that US trainers were not allowed to treat the Iraqis the way that drill sergeants treat rookies. No doubt political correctness and cultural sensitivity concerns lie at the bottom of this.
This man, who I believe the Democrats don’t even bother top challenge in the elections, is becoming an ikon of American stupidity and brass- thus does representative democracy throw up an epitome of a doltish society to lead its most representative institution.
Looking at the bright side the US military seems to have done one helluva job motivating and training its jihadi spin off ISIS.
“Looking at the bright side the US military seems to have done one helluva job motivating and training its jihadi spin off ISIS.”
*
Yes, at least I can feel that, as a US taxpayer, I’m getting some value for my dollar$ with ISIS. Not exactly snark either.
*
Isn’t it interesting, though, how allegedly “successful” ISIS appears to be in their death-dealing & destructive capabilities? Yet, US troops in Iraq & Afghanistan appeared less successful. I truly do not know if that is factual – it’s just the way things are presented to us rubes by the propaganda media.
*
Albeit that said, I do believe that ISIS was recruited, trained, armed & run by the CIA. Perhaps the CIA should run the US military? shudder. That’s a scary thought.
quote“Until the president gets serious about fighting the fight, until he has a strategy that makes sense, there’s no reason for us to give him less authority than what he has today, which is what he’s asking for,”…(snip)unquote
Hahahahahahaha! If logic was water, Boehner would be the Sahara. What a dolt.
(snip)quote”….Boehner told a group of reporters Tuesday, following his trip with lawmakers to several Middle East hot spots during the congressional recess.”unquote
ya mean like this “hot spot”?
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2015/03/20/Boehner_to_visit_Israel.html
sheeezushchrist. If obfuscation were weather the NYT would be a fucking 5.9 hurricane.
Boehner in Israel? Yeah, not exactly like Nixon in China, is it? How low the formerly sort of mighty have fallen. Boehner is such a joke.
Congress-critters, unlike in previous times when they valued the Constitution and their own prerogatives, recently have fallen over themselves in encouraging the executive to take as much power as they want to make war. I noticed it especially with McCain and Bush back in 2002. The (unconstitutional) War Powers Act is another example.
.
This strategy allows Congress-critters to insulate themselves from those messy foreign imperialist adventures, and lets them concentrate on fund-raising and important stuff like that while The Decider does the important things.
.
This is now a totally screwed-up country and we live in it, most of us.