Paxson Refreshes McCain’s Memory
Rut Roh.
Bud Paxson’s memory seems to corroborate that of McCain’s former aides and McCain’s signed deposition, both of which suggest that McCain met with Paxson–and Iseman–personally before he sent his letters to the FCC. Or, to put it another way, Paxson says McCain’s little promises yesterday were false.
Broadcaster Lowell "Bud" Paxson today contradicted statements from Sen. John McCain‘s presidential campaign that the senator did not meet with Paxson or his lobbyist before sending two controversial letters to the Federal Communications Commission on Paxson’s behalf.
Paxson said he talked with McCain in his Washington office several weeks before the Arizona Republican wrote the letters to the FCC urging a rapid decision on Paxson’s quest to acquire a Pittsburgh television station.
Paxson also recalled that his lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, attended the meeting in McCain’s office and that Iseman helped arrange the meeting. "Was Vicki there? Probably," Paxson said in an interview with The Washington Post today. "The woman was a professional. She was good. She could get us meetings."
So Paxson effectively deems McCain’s performance yesterday a lie. Though I’m not sure how credible we should judge him, since he seems to think we have "thousands" of members of Congress.
Paxson saw no particular significance in the meeting with McCain prior to his penning the FCC letters. "Vicki Iseman, probably between myself and [Paxson Communications President] Dean Goodman at that time, took us in to see a thousand senators and congressmen," Paxson said. "She was our lobbyist. She was there and helped."
Paxson seems quite interested in defending the honor of Iseman. But the most intriguing detail, IMO, stains the honor of all involved.
The second letter came on Dec. 10, a day after the company’s jet ferried McCain to a Florida fundraiser aboard a yacht in West Palm Beach. The fundraiser was arranged by Hector Alcalde of Alcalde & Fay and was hosted by a cruise line that Alcalde had represented, Paxson said. Paxson said he attended the fundraiser.
As I suspected, Paxson flew McCain to a fundraiser in FL, organized by Iseman’s boss, and probably hosted at the house of the owner of Carnival Cruise lines. Paxson, Iseman, McCain, Alcalde–they all were there. In other words, this was Alcalde and Fay as a company sponsoring McCain’s campaign, not just individual clients of Iseman’s who had businses with McCain.
The stories about John Weaver chasing Iseman away have always suggested, to me, that her closeness (and her bragging about her closeness to McCain) created that perception that McCain was Alcalde and Fay’s Senator, not just Iseman’s. And the confirmation that this fund-raiser was about several of Alcalde and Fay’s clients, and not just Paxson, certainly supports that perception.
Thousands of members of congress. Can’t calculate it myself, but I am guessing that to arrive at 1000+, one needs to go back to LBJ if not further.
Busy day for you EW, thanks for the effort.
I was afraid you were going to tie John McCain to Florida business Sun Cruz Casinos owned by Gus Boulis who’s name is likely mentioned in some of the Abramoff hearings transcripts.
-GSD
EW, you have certainly been busy! How in the world do you keep up with all of what one person said to another?
Can we nominate Marcy for a Polk Award…?
I’ve nothing constructive to add to the discussion, I just wanted to say about the last couple of days: Marcy, you’re ON FIRE!
I like to imagine you’ve been cunningly storing all this up for the day when you knew some MSM reporters might check in around these parts to look for it…
I like to imagine you’ve been running a blogger research sweat shop in North Korea or something. Nobody could be that informed about so many subjects, with such detail,and be able to post all of this stuff so fast
I’m sure there’s a sweat shop some where, with a bunch of overworked and underpaid unfortunate souls poring over computer screens and “doing the google”, reading infinite archives and backchecking old newspapers, all while being guarded by soldiers wearing jack boots or something …
Marcy Wheeler ??? she’s just an actor, hired to give a face to this attrocious left wing blogger operation that seeks to discredit reputable repuglitard crooks and liars
I like to believe that, cuz there’s no way a single human could do all this. And that means if there ain’t a sweatshop, there’s only one other alternative:
we’ve all been worshiping a MACHINE
(wink)
if paxson remembers it different, THAT’S JUST HIS OPINION
If the FEC chairman disagrees with john mccain, that’s just his opinion
if you disagree with john mccain about Iraq, you don’t understand the military
beginning to see a pattern here ???
LOL!
What shocks me is that Paxson squealed so fast and easy. St. McCain must not have been a good Pax boy lately…
Freepatriot – Welcome to the machine. Have a cigar. You’ll go far. Buzz Click!!
HE does say that McCain disagreed with him three other occasions (though he doesn’t mention that McCain also helped him mightily on changeover to public safety channels.
I’m thinking the NYT has a whole string of people to corroborate the story. McCain had a chance to come clean/own up, and chose to behave like an 11 year old.
The authority figures are getting to work.
Poor John. Just didn’t have the strength to be honest.
I’ve been reading the times Q & A on the article, and this question caught my attention:
I got a question for this questioner:
you think mccain spent months coming up with this response to this story ???
He’s been caught in about 4 lies, and you think mccain meant to do that ???
Well, I’d hazard a guess that there is more than one cute, perky and 2-4 decades younger blonde that McCain, ahem, “lobbied” since he has been in Congress. If you know what I mean…..
McCain had a reputation when younger as a real skirt chaser. Old dogs don’t change spots and maybe the advent of the little blue pill, etc. just rekindled old fires!!
I’m telling you, from what i have been hearing, you can take that to the bank.
LOL, still hearing everyone’s favorite story of a DIFFERENT blond?
The hits just keep coming….
I don’t really think he “squealed”. I think he just answered the phone when the press called, and he gave honest answers to their questions. Did he meet McCain? Yep. From Paxon’s viewpoint, nobody did anything illegal, or even anything wrong. Why shouldn’t he be willing to talk about it?
I have to say that I’m getting more and more curious about Iseman. Why’d she lawyer up? I’m wondering if her “relationship” with McCain was a lot less salacious and a lot more illegal.
Another thing: Thus far, nobody’s been willing to tell us what she was saying about McCain back in 1999. My hunch: She was telling people that she had a very “close” relationship with McCain. Wink wink, nudge nudge. It would certainly be in her best interest to make her clients think she was having an affair with McCain–that would give her one hell of an edge as a lobbyist, no?
Yes! Why, indeed, did she immediately seek out legal help? That’s not the act of someone with nothing to hide.
That’s what I’m wondering, too.
Conason wrote in Salon today about McCain’s sudden interest around 2000 in the deregulation of the passenger cruise line industry. That’s an interesting thread to pull on.
Saw mention of that somewhere–absolutely. The whole firm owned McCain, not just Paxson. Thing is, so many of the issues Iseman was (is) working on were connected–all about consolidating conservative media.
I hope he did “lobbby” them. Hope he had a damn good time doing it. Doesn’t matter. Obama’s going to hand his old ass to him in November. I find any other outcome highly improbable at this point.
I do, too. But November is LONG way away. I’m not counting my chickens.
Who else they got to prop up? Bob Dole is rested and ready I guess. Maybe Ron Paul will get the favorite son nod in Texas and go on a roll…
I agree with you to some extent. 2006 knocked out all of their standard bearers. But I’m still a bit amazed that they couldn’t find even one attractive, semi-articulate Republican in his 40s or 50s to run for President. I look at their candidates, and I feel kind of like I did when the last pope was elected. “THAT’s the best you’ve got?!”
huckaberry is ready to fight to the end
pass the popcorn, this is getting interesting
I kinda wonder if a religious broadcaster aware of Paxson’s lobbying efforts but ideologically closer to the Huckabee campaign basically broke ranks and ratted on them. Maybe Dobson…or someone with Family Broadcasting?
or it could be related to this:
Jack Abramoff: John McCain’s other Lobbyist problem…
props to dengre at DKOS
and here’s the answer about the abramoff papers:
I’m telling ya, I got a nose for this stuff, and Dengre agrees
it’s like the repuglitards got caught in a perfect storm of corruption
and senator mccain, we intend to have a look at those files you been hiding …
Why would a youngish semi-articulate republican run this year? If such a person existed, which doesn’t seem the case…
chronic stupidity ???
I still ain’t figured out how senator buttjuice* resisted the temptation
he’s young, dumb, and repuglitarded. He speaks in complete sentences most of the time, so he fit’s your above described profile. Anybody know why he didn’t take one for the team ???
*you don’t wanna know
told ya not to look …
Do you really think that Bob Dole is – ahem – up to the job?
Yeah, I dunno; thats hard to say.
Sure hope this is either Abramoff (which at the moment it sounds like), or just the Times somehow getting lucky. Will his campaign make it through next week?
bob dole says you guys are being a little hard on bob dole
bob dole doesn’t like it when people are a little hard on bob dole
bob dole says liddy dole doesn’t like it when people are a little hard on bob dole
I’ll stop now, cuz it just gets a little pornographic after that
what ???
they started it …
okay, so I might have been the one who mentioned the santorum
but I wasn’t the one who started talking about bob dole’s little hard on
(ducking and running)
These newer digs are mighty fine and all, but posts just get away too darn fast. We need a longer active listing of post by title only somewhere front and center, so that they don’t get “out of sight, out of mind so quick” Discussions on TNH used to go on for days sometimes over a week. Here they are lucky to make 36 hours.
Perhaps the menu could be set up to where you roll glide over a title and the preview comes up. I actually like the preview feature also. That way you could have both without giving up add space, which I certainly understand is needed as well. Just a thought.
this is off-topic, but I don’t wanna go back to find the thread where it belongs
speaking about refreshed memories:
that party at Jose Conseco’s ??? the one that roger clemens says he wasn’t at ???
photographic evidence seems to have surfaced to prove otherwise …
The purpose of McCain’s direct interference was in Paxson’s effort to purchase the Non-commercial TV station WQEX-Pittsburgh from WQED. Paxson was eventually told by the FCC that they could not b’cast proslytizing material and programming must be substantially educational and sectarian-neutral. In addition the Commission warnd Paxson that fundraising on NCO stations must be limited to station-development purposes, and not to the other interests of the licensee or the programmers.
Thus no on-air fundraising for churches or ministers or missionaries, etc.
Aw gee the church can’t control all the stations. Wipin tears away. How does Clear Channel get to.
I think that Paxson thought they had this “great idea” to circumvent the glutted commercial radio spectrum by buying up college radio and TV stations (and struggling PBS stations) on the cheap. They would then make them money-machines by constant Pat-Robertson-like pleas for support for various causes. It would be an “indulgence” machine. The FCC, then led by a former Stanford-University college DJ smelled a rat, and they issued these pre-emptive rulings [BTW This same Commissioner pushed for low-power radio stations, which McCain (Chair of the Commerce Committee) also supported but insisted that commercial stations have the absolute power to pull their plugs if they “suspected” there was any interference]. Bush of course, appointed his cronies to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, so the desire to shift stations to the religious b’casters was lessened since they could get stuff aired by insisting on “balance”.
Actually there were, and still are, a lot of religious stations out there on the Non-Commercial radio dial doing illicit fundraising and even political campaign activities…but that was under Michael Powell. The current guy is just as bad!
Note she was working for some of the companies Clear Channel was eating up too. This woman is a real piece of work.
You are hitting a donnybrook tonight…they started it… Made me laugh and I needed it. I love… will his campaign lasy until next week.
who needs impeachment investigations as long as McTorture is running. Go John baby
Um … Gus Boulis? Cruise ship lines? Florida? 2000?
I’m having a *very* difficult time restraining myself from indulging in gross speculation here …
I’ll add my two bits to the unspoken picture: note that Alcalde & Fay represents several Florida-based air-transport concerns as well.
Someone needs to get the McCain legislation and activities (earmarks, tabling, etc.) during the period 1998-2000 and establish whether Alcade clients were the focus of McCain’s activities.
EW:
Have you seen this?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/…..390/462347
It’s like … McCain, as chairman of Indian Affairs, started the Abramoff scandal as payback against Jack, Reed & Norquist, who had screwed him in 2000 … but he didn’t realize that he was opening up a Pandora’s Box so vile that it would cause Bush to lose in 2004, so he slow-walked the crap out of it until after the 2004 election.
In other words, McCain covered up Abramoff to save Bush!
Or so it seems to my sleep-deprived little pea brain.
that was supposed to have a link in it
lost in the innertubes now, I guess
Jack Abramoff: John McCain’s other Lobbyist problem…
if anybody finds an extra link, I’m the one who lost it
Freepatriot is the missing link?
I’m not “missing”
I’m just waiting for evolution to make a better offer …
Am I not thinking clearly or could Obama beat McCain senseless with his role in protecting Bush’s 2004 campaign from the Abramoff scandal?
I mean … isn’t this almost bad enough to cost him the nomination, even at this late date? It’s certainly infinitely worse than the Iseman thing, no?
I wanna know who the Democrats are that agreed to this deal ???
shouldn’t take long to find these bastards
time to start calling some Senators and asking some questions
LUCY, YOU GOT SOME SPLAININ TO DO !!!
OK, I’m confused. Until today McCain was the R’s apparent nominee. Now there are multiple simultaneous attacks on/near him, including Renzi who we discover is Cheney’s guy and tied to data mining running all the way back to John fricking Poindexter. And at exactly the same time the PAA/FISA thing is stalled, no less. So. If this is coordinated (not that I assume it is), then who’s behind it? If it’s not The Revenge of Abramoff but some group on the R’s side, and if this succeeds in knocking McCain out of contention, then who is the R’s new designated nominee? Does it move back to Romney, or what?
Think Bush, Jeb Bush.
There has been much written that it will be Colin Powell…I’ll try to go back and find some of the write-ups and link…
I do hope that the Abramoff connection comes out and ties into McCain, Bush, Cheney…GOP money laundering for the election…
EW,
I know you are working on this.
I have an image that you have this “strategy wall” covered with post-it’s charting timelines on all the controversies with strings connecting events from the different timelines and that you are so close to “making” the final connections…
Your amazing speed for analysis on the information that dribbles out is simply beyond comprehension. Thank you!
I’m not touching Abramoff, not now anyway. There’s something concrete about ISeman that goes to the heart of the Republican strategy on media. I’m going to focus on that, thanks.
That would be hilarious. Oh yeah, Obama, well, we can trump your historic run with our own experienced historic candidate! I think I would die laughing.
IMO it’s not coordinated. I think the Iseman stuff was planted by Mitch McConnell last fall in an attempt to make sure his chosen candidate (don’t know who that was–probably Fred until Fred proved to be so comatose) won.
Remember when McCain hired Bennett, he was trying to avoid a South Carolina–that is, an attack from his Republican opponents.
So Bennett succeeded in stalling this and even in getting NYT to endorse McCain.
But then TNR pushed it into the open–using the same tactics as Drudge, really, but coming from a source that NYT actually cared about.
So now the tip that was supposed to sink McCain may well be sinking him too late. I suspect if it gets too much worse, they’ll jettison him and pick Mitt or someone like GOvernor Crist or Pawlenty or Pataki. But I don’t think this was supposed to work this way.
I agree with your assessment on the timing and intent of all this. It definitely reads like a Republican hit piece. And it would have successfully tanked McCain had it come out before the primaries began. Now, it’s just going to complicate the R’s strategy for November. They desperately need someone likable enough to both R’s and independents to not get blown out in the Congressional races. I don’t think anyone is seriously contemplating the possibility of winning the Presidency at this point.
If it was McConnell, it will be richly ironic that the R’s Senate Minority Leader may have effectively shot his own party’s electoral prospects in the foot with this little maneuver. I wonder if he will retain his leadership position (assuming he is re-elected, I think he’s up this fall isn’t he)?
Oh yeah, he’s up, and not doing so well approval wise, either. He’s basically hanging in there by funnelling more tobacco cash to KY, which is ironic considering the underlying reason why he hates McCain so much.
Well, lets hope he doesn’t stay in the Senate long enough to endure the humiliation of having his own members turn on him ; )
Pawlenty! God help us!
Scared you, huh? I imagine they wouldn’t pick Jeb, not with BUsh’s approval at 19% and sure to fall as the economy gets worse. So then they pick a governor of a state that they might be able to win. McCain sucks in MN, particularly against Obama. But with Pawlenty, who knows? OH, MO, CA, AZ, NM are all out. CO is a possibility, but that only keeps them even with 2004, in a year where Obama has a shot at several of the swing states we lost in 2004. So MN and FL have to be good options.
I keep hoping that the romantic angle of the story pans out. I really want to believe that McCain was just trying to help out his girlfriend. It would mark a return to the kind of petty corruption I’ve really missed over the past seven years.
Just Googled santorum and boosted my education. Masterful use of creative language to handle a monster. JelloJay needs a contest to morph it into something more effective.
I am late to the party of linguistic skill. Can a another reader start the game?