Trump Preparing to Fire FBI Agents Who Treated a Violent Attack on Congress as a Crime

Emil Bove, the Trump defense attorney who is serving as the Acting Deputy Attorney General until Trump installs another of his defense attorneys in the post, is preparing to purge up to 6,000 FBI Agents who participated in the investigation into the crime scene on January 6.

Bulwark has a good summary and links to other coverage.

Emil Bove, Trump’s former defense lawyer, who is now acting deputy attorney general and in charge of the Justice Department, ordered the removal of at least six top FBI career executives. Bove also requested the names of all FBI agents who worked on January 6th cases.

[snip]

Over the weekend, in a blizzard of activity (helpful reporting can be found here, and here, and here), FBI officials moved to resist the attempted coup.

Though he had carried out the order to decapitate the bureau’s top executives the day before, on Friday acting FBI Director Brian Driscoll reportedly refused to agree to fire certain agents involved with January 6th cases, and was trying to block a mass purge of such agents. In a message to staff Saturday, Driscoll reminded FBI agents of their rights to “due process and review in accordance with existing policy and law,” and emphasized “That process and our intent to follow it have not changed.”

The FBI Agents Association sent a memo to employees over the weekend to remind them of their civil service protections. The memo urged them not to resign or to offer to resign, and recommended that agents respond to one question in the survey they’ve been instructed to answer: “I have been told I am ‘required to respond’ to this survey, without being afforded appropriate time to research my answers, speak with others, speak with counsel or other representation.”

And in a remarkable letter, obtained by The Bulwark, the president of the Society of Former FBI Agents—a group that seeks to stay out of politics—said the following:

The obvious disruption to FBI operations cannot be overstated with the forced retirement of the Director, Deputy Director, and now all five Executive Assistant Directors. Add in the immediate removal of a number of SACs [Special Agents in Charge] and the requests for lists of investigative personnel assigned to specific investigations and you know from your experience that extreme disruption is occurring to the FBI—at a time when the terrorist threat around the world has never been greater.

Then on Sunday the top agent at the FBI’s New York field office, James Dennehy, wrote in an email to his staff: “Today, we find ourselves in the middle of a battle of our own, as good people are being walked out of the F.B.I. and others are being targeted because they did their jobs in accordance with the law and F.B.I. policy. . . . Time for me to dig in.”

What no one is saying in their coverage, however, is that Trump — through Bove — is effectively trying to remove thousands of FBI Agents because they treated a violent attack on the Capitol, one that put Members of Congress at real risk (as the video of Chuck Grassley fleeing, which Kyle Cheney first discovered, shows).

This mob wasn’t just coming after Mike Pence and Nancy Pelosi (and AOC) by name. They were also coming after Mitch McConnell by name. As I’ve shown, Ryan Nichols was calling to drag every member of Congress who certified Joe Biden’s win, which includes Grassley, Lindsey Graham, and John Cornyn.

Trump is trying to make it a firing offense for the FBI to investigate people — including some adjudged terrorists — who attacked a co-equal branch of government.

And thus far, Senators who could stop it have done nothing.

Purging these agents will not just devastate the FBI workforce, throwing away decades of expertise. But it will also send a message that Trump can sic a mob on Congress with no response from law enforcement.

58 replies
  1. Ginevra diBenci says:

    “And thus far, Senators who could stop it have done nothing.”

    I assume you mean GOP senators, because I don’t see how their outnumbered Democratic colleagues could stop any of this. But what could even Republican senators do in the face of such illegal overreach?

    • crankyOldGuy says:

      The GOP senators could (pretty much) stop the coup dead in its tracks in short order. All they need to do is start multiple committee hearings on Trump’s/Musk’s illegal actions, and start rejecting his nominees.

      Obviously, that’s not going to happen at this point, given they have become his toadies. But it is certainly within their power (and their constitutional responsibility) to do so.

      • Rugger_9 says:

        Fundamentally, they still fear MAGA in the primaries and that is more compelling to these spineless dweebs than love of country. Look how Joni Ernst caved to a primary threat. Wasn’t she a survivor herself?

        • Frank Anon says:

          Is adjacency to power so overwhelming, even if it’s toothless experience with no power, that no Republican senator can envision themselves as a hero to history, even those not intending to tun for reelection? I’m just gobsmacked by the total absence of guts

        • BRUCE F COLE says:

          @Frank Anon

          Me too, as to the condition of my gob. Absence of guts, historical perspective, and integrity.

          My Senator, fortunately, is Collins, so us Mainers have a leverage point, given that she’s a red Sen in a blue state. Still, that she’s not fully in the Cheney camp vis a vis Trump speaks to the guts issue.

        • wetzel-rhymes-with says:

          I think they fear more than primaries. Trump has suggested dozens of times to use the government to target political enemies. His most violent threats have been against members of his own party, such as when he suggested Liz Cheney should have to face guns. They’re just running along holding their pitchforks trying not to stand out.

        • Critter7 says:

          They also fear Trump-inspired death threats and worse by the MAGA mobs that jump into action at his every word.

      • Ginevra diBenci says:

        crankyOldGuy:

        Your response (which lays out an indisputable truth) made me realize I should have phrased my question differently. What I meant was, what can *any* senator do to *directly* address such illegal overreach when it occurs outside of congressional purview?

      • timbozone says:

        Maybe. Maybe not. The Robert’s court in its ruling last summer ceded a ton of initiative to an Executive Branch that is lead by someone who doesn’t give a damn about the Congress.

    • RealAlexi says:

      # Naked fear.

      First Act, Scene One:

      Trump lets his personal militia out of jail for committing acts of terror in his name.
      Message sent and received.

      #2: Kompromat.

  2. Mike Stone says:

    What does Trump have on the GOP members of Congress?

    They are gladly willing to give up their responsibilities as members of Congress.

    They are gladly willing to give in to a clear fascist to take over the country (don’t most of these people have children?).

    They are gladly willing to accept any insult thrown their way and prostrate themselves to a wannabe dictator.

    Are they willing to allow the destruction of the country that is now in progress?

    • Gacyclist says:

      Their fear of the maga base and being primaried .we won’t have democracy by the 28 elections and certainly no real elections in 26 or 28.

    • Howard Cutter says:

      I think they’re all compromised. We know that the NRA acted as a “Foreign Asset” to Russia ahead of the 2016 election. We know how deeply entangled the GOP as a whole is with the NRA. We know of a group of GOW lawmakers who all celebrated the 4th of July, 2018 in Moscow. As they say, a spoonful of tar spoils a barrel of honey.

      • RealAlexi says:

        I think you’ve got a point. The GOP is compromised and the Kremlin has the Kompromat. I also think Trump wants his DNI to be a Russia shill who argues that current Muskovite Eddy Snowden deserves a pardon. I also know Russia hacked the GOP in 2015 and the DNC and we never found out just what shorthairs the Russians are squeezing on the Repubes whenever they feel like it. And we know that Trump had a number of conversations with Putin while he was OUT of office.

        It sounds conspiratorial because it is. I actually hope it’s just smoke. But it certainly stinks to high heaven.

  3. Stephen Calhoun says:

    We’re in uncharted territory. Will people accommodate the take over for the sake of their paychecks? Every government employee who takes an oath is going to be, soon, faced with a decision.

    The move from the rule of law to the law of the ruler hopefully will face intense resistance from the law-keepers and some lawmakers. As for the citizenry. . .?

  4. P J Evans says:

    Wait until they get Donnie or President Musk mad at them, and their paychecks get “lost”. Or until their constituents discover how much of what they buy is from Canada, Mexico, or China, and start complaining about prices going up *a lot*.

    • Rugger_9 says:

      It appears Canada is targeting the red states to get the point across.

      As of right now: Dow down 100 – 150 after opening down 500+, the other major indexes are down around 0.7 to 1.1 %. Notably, Convict-1 has paused his tariffs on Mexico for a month today, which makes the claim of exigent circumstances even more bogus. It’s either a fire burning or it is not.

      If I were suspicious, I would wonder who shorted the market this morning.

      • e.a. foster says:

        Yes, the federal government has decided there is no point in making life difficult for States which voted for Democrats. There are States which voted for Trump and put him into office.
        There has always been a fair amount of co operation between the State of Washington and B.C.
        A few years ago the Governors of Washington, Oregon, and California met with Premier John Horgan to discuss a rail way system connecting all of us. Yes, it would be very expensive but it would take a lot of freight trucks off the highways and cars. Europe and China have extensive railway systems. We might want to get on board with that.

  5. Savage Librarian says:

    Ironically, I’m beginning to think that the Supreme Court overruling Chevron in June 2024 might turn out to be useful.

    Upon a cursory look at the Civil Service Rules in the CFR, I’m seriously wondering if there are major built in vulnerabilities that nobody ever realized because it wasn’t written to assume there would be the extent of corruption and bad faith we face today.

    Just right off the bat there is the reference to the power of OPM in this rule:

    § 1.2 Extent of the competitive service

    It occurs to me that Musk and the Heritage Foundation and many others are using this vulnerability. Remember, Rebekah Mercer and Peter Thiel are two of the donors of the Rockbridge Network, which has aspirations to fund and build a future Republican administration. So, they may also be aware of this

      • Ginevra diBenci says:

        SL, you have given us the keys to a goldmine. “Prohibitions on Political Activity,” for example, provides a single, brilliantly concise paragraph that in essence tells Elon Musk he can take his entire project and shove it.

        Thank you for everything you do.

        • Savage Librarian says:

          I love the USA. I really don’t want to see it go down the tubes because of greed, pride, cowardice and stupidity. Thank you for all you do, as well, Ginevra!

          There’s also this:

          “Hatch Act Overview”

          “The Hatch Act, a federal law passed in 1939, limits certain political activities of federal employees, as well as some state, D.C., and local government employees who work in connection with federally funded programs. The law’s purposes are to ensure that federal programs are administered in a nonpartisan fashion, to protect federal employees from political coercion in the workplace, and to ensure that federal employees are advanced based on merit and not based on political affiliation.”

          https://osc.gov/Services/pages/hatchact.aspx

  6. thequickbrownfox says:

    A career Civil Service employee cannot simply be fired without cause. Even in a RIF, those career employees have a right to re-employment when a position that they are demonstrably qualified to assume comes open. The colloquial term for those employees applying for a different, but somewhat similar position, was being on a ‘Block List’, which requires that the list blockers have ‘first dibs’ on the position.
    The order of re-employment, as well as RIF, is the same, from first hired on the Block List to last RIF’d.
    1. Career employees in categories 1,2,3
    2. Disabled military veterans and non-disabled veterans
    3. Years of service and performance evaluations

    Career and ex-military is a sure re-hire in very short order

    The point of this is, the admin has tried to take a big bite, and I think it’s going to choke.

    • Savage Librarian says:

      The point of my comment above (11:49) is that the Civil Service Rules give OPM discretion. Now that bad actors have the reins of power, they can exercise discretions that honorable people did not take into consideration before. That’s why I think it might now be useful that the Supreme Court overruled Chevron in June 2024.

      • thequickbrownfox says:

        Here it comes (a conversation on X)

        “President Donald Trump’s “government efficiency” cheerleader Elon Musk proposed simply ignoring all federal regulations during a public call shortly after midnight Monday morning”

      • Eschscholzia says:

        While I hope you’re right and I’m wrong, I see the demise of Chevron deference a different way. Part is that Congress cannot write broad laws and defer to the expertise of agencies to fill in the details. But the other part is that given existing “vague” laws, judges, not scientists & experts in agencies, decide what the law means. I have little expectation that the Federalist Society / Unitary Presidency (for Republicans only) SCOTUS bloc will rule that civil service law protects executive branch federal employees from anything a (again: Republican) President decrees.

        I’m not as negative and despondent as my recent posts seem. I have hope; I just see a long step by step slog ahead to turn things around: no magic bullet of a court case or “now they’ve finally gone too far”.

        • Savage Librarian says:

          I pretty much agree with you. But now that I realize that bad actors in an agency can do devastating things, I’m hopeful that there are at least some honorable jurists. No magic bullets. Long slog if we can make it.

      • RipNoLonger says:

        When they succeed in stifling internet communications, all information about people like Russ Vought will no longer be available to most of us. I expect this operation to be very high on their “to do” list. Just like Russia and China and other autocratic states.

        Load up your devices with as much reading material as they can hold, and hope the bastards don’t also shut down the power grid.

      • BRUCE F COLE says:

        Nothing worse than a rampaging old-school Catholic.

        Someone should ask Vance if he’s worried about his kids going to schools run by the Catholic Church, given their track record? Ask him if he thinks of it as a form of Purgatory, except you don’t get to die. (Nuns and priests “guided me” through primary and secondary schooling, back in pre-Vatican II days, so I’m not calling it “Purgatory” blithely or without cause.)

        • earlofhuntingdon says:

          “Raging old-school Catholics” have generated hundreds of years of religious wars, and populated heaven and hell beyond imagining.

      • Ginevra diBenci says:

        Vought stands out. Even amidst a vile litter of sociopathic atavists, Vought poses singular dangers–for his stated intentions, for his purely antisocial tendencies, and especially for the deferential awe with which his MAGA colleagues treat him.

        He warrants the special treatment that the Senate Democrats managed to cobble together last night–their all-nighter spent commandeering the floor to fend off Vought’s confirmation. It won’t work in the long run; the GOP is rapidly acquiring the atavistic antisocial personality disorder of such leaders as Musk, Trump and Vought, to say nothing of fearing for their physical safety (as reported by Rep. Jim Himes).

        But it might give the media time to report just a little on what Vought’s about.

  7. dadidoc1 says:

    The lack of response from our Republican representatives is a reflection of their complicity in the events surrounding the January 6th insurrection. They all risk serious jail time if their involvement is revealed. If a bloodless coup will keep them out of jail, so be it.

  8. OldTulsaDude says:

    The question is how far have the gloves come off? Paper airplanes made of law will be worthless without willingness and ability to enforce and the other side is using Blackhawk gunships. Will this really get down to which side is the US Army is on?

    • RipNoLonger says:

      Per your reference to paper airplanes, a good question might be which side the US Air Force is on. My limited experience with the branches has led me to believe that the USAF has been well inculcated (or infiltrated?) by RW xian teachings. I have no idea (any more) how the real power structure within the operational forces works.

      • Rugger_9 says:

        The Air Force Academy has a long-running scandal about being a Dominionist stronghold with the litigation with MRFF to prove it. So, I would not be surprised at all if the Chair Force (I’m USN so I can say this) rolled over for Convict-1 and the Dominionist MAGAs.

  9. e.a. foster says:

    Trump must be having a brain fart. he is carrying on as if the world was coming to an end because there are drugs coming into the country and undocumented people. He says it is so serious he is imposing tariffs. As this post informs Trump is also looking to fire 6K F.B.I Agents. Now the last time I looked governments usually increase the number of police when crime is allegedly increasing and destroying their country.
    Was just checking the t.v. and CBC had Trump in the Oval Office carrying on about the awful Canadians. I think he is loosing his immediate memory. He keeps repeating himself. Then he’ll have another thought and then repeat the thought before that. Isn’t time to have him examined to check if he is O.K. or mentally impaired? Some of his other comments to the press are filled with half truths, out right lies. I’d suggest there is something wrong with his brain. Did he have a stroke or something?
    Trump keeps saying Canada is taking advantage of the U.S.A. Just awful advantage. We won’t let their banks open offices in Canada……yada yada, yada. So here we are a country of approx. 40 million taking “advantage” of the U.S.A. with a population of approx. 340 million, with the largest, most sophisticated military in the world, the best technology in the world, etc. Would Trump please explain how we do that? I remember when the Americans put the first human on the moon. I’ve seen the American military jets on video along with some of the Navy’s ships and subs. Now Trump says we are taking advantage of the U.S.A. How do we with a very small military out smart the U.S.A. What trump is actually saying, when he wails on about Canada and Mexico is we are smarter and more business savy than the Americans. think there could be a poster in there somewhere.
    When a country opens their financial sector they are endangering their country. We are a small country with tight controls over how the banks and Credit Unions operate. It keeps things pretty well on the right track.
    Canada has a little over 30 banks. The five largest are where most Canadians bank and The Bank of Montreal is the oldest established in 1817. It is much easier for a government to keep track of their banking institutions by keeping the number of banks low and Canadian.
    Mexico has permitted foreign banks to do business in their country. This caused problems. One of the problems was a large Canadian bank, the T.-D. banks. some people refer to the T.D. as the bank of choice for the Mexican drug dealers. We ought not to have our banks in other countries.

    It really is about time the elected officials in Washington DC start doing their jobs. That includes Democrats and Republicans. About the only strong comments I’ve heard on the news is the one from AOC. Can”t figure out why every one voted for some of those cabinet members, even all the Democrats voted for Rubio.
    McConnelll is 82, like you do have to wonder why he doesn’t get a set and speak out. Its not like he is going to live forever. The mob wasn’t going to spare him if they got their hands on him. He owes Trump nothing.

    • P J Evans says:

      US banks do business in Canada just fine – as long as they follow Canadian law. TFG is either unaware or uninformed about other countries *and their laws*. (This isn’t a surprise – he’s also unaware or uninformed about a lot of US laws.)

    • Ginevra diBenci says:

      “Isn’t time to have him examined to check if he is O.K. or mentally impaired?”

      I read this morning about a rumor going around: administration insiders are waiting for the cabinet to be confirmed before invoking Article 25, and ditching Trump for Vance.

      Should this be true, I wonder how much it would matter, in the short term at least. Maybe GOP senators would buck up and be-spine themselves with Vance, who does not exactly command a cult following of millions–but it does threaten that Peter Thiel will become co-president with Musk.

  10. GSSH-FullyReduced says:

    Federal government paychecks are sent to senators and house representatives, right?
    SCOTUS and fed judges get them too, right?
    Fed government pays for their medical care, their security details and office staff, right?
    Time to stick a fork in the outlet and blow the breaker: come-on elon, just do it, dare ya.

    • P J Evans says:

      Conresspeople may not have thought it that far through: if they get on the wrong side of the WH and its uncurbed minions, their paychecks and travel reimbursements might get “lost”. They should really consider that as a potential threat/problem.
      If we can think of this, they should be able to.

  11. wetzel-rhymes-with says:

    Animal Farm was lost when Jessie and Bluebell lost their puppies to Napoleon. What I mean is that experienced leaders in the FBI must be as firm as iron.

  12. RealAlexi says:

    Good luck firing 6,000 FBI agents with receiving very severe repercussions from the agents in question and their thousands of friends and colleagues who just watched the fake tribunals and hangings.

    Trump and Co think they don’t like the FBI now? Ha. Just you wait. Thousands of intel professionals after your ass, and it’s personal this time.

Comments are closed.