Some of the Ways Trump’s Immigrant Invader Damaged America in Just Two Weeks

I think one effect of Trump’s attempt to wow journalists with the appearance of action is to hide how many major fuck-ups and failed promises Trump has had in his first two weeks (like the serial confession that Trump and Stephen Miller lied to voters about how many criminal aliens there are and Trump’s equivocations about multiple of the tariffs he will set).

But one locus of many of the worst failures comes from this unelected immigrant.

Among the things that African immigrant Elon Musk has done in the last few weeks was:

Forced FAA’s head, Michael Whitaker, out days before a fatal crash. As the Verge explained, Elon took Whitaker out because he deigned to regulate Musk’s companies.

But Musk’s efforts to get Whitaker were well known even before Trump’s victory in November. He has complained many times about the FAA, lashing out in September after the agency levied a $633,000 fine for launching missions with unapproved changes. (Musk is worth over $400 billion, making him the richest man in the world.)

The FAA has also fined Starlink, after the SpaceX subsidiary failed to submit safety data before launching satellites in 2022. In a House hearing, Whitaker explained that the FAA’s civil penalties were “the only tool we have to get compliance on safety matters.”

On X, Musk complained that the FAA was “harassing SpaceX about nonsense that doesn’t affect safety while giving a free pass to Boeing even after NASA concluded that their spacecraft was not safe enough to bring back the astronauts.” He also claimed that humans would never land on Mars without “radical reform at the FAA.” In September, he wrote “he needs to resign” about Whitaker.

Elon also pushed out the guy who manages America’s checkbook, David Lebryk, in whom a lot of the confidence of investors and businessmen is invested.

The highest-ranking career official at the Treasury Department is departing after a clash with allies of billionaire Elon Musk over access to sensitive payment systems, according to three people with knowledge of the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private talks.

David A. Lebryk, who served in nonpolitical roles at Treasury for several decades, announced his retirement Friday in an email to colleagues obtained by The Washington Post. President Donald Trump named Lebryk as acting secretary upon taking office last week. Lebryk had a dispute with Musk’s surrogates over access to the payment system the U.S. government uses to disburse trillions of dollars every year, the people said. The exact nature of the disagreement was not immediately clear, they said.

Officials affiliated with Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” have been asking since after the election for access to the system, the people said — requests that were reiterated more recently, including after Trump’s inauguration.

[snip]

Typically only a small number of career officials control Treasury’s payment systems. Run by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, the sensitive systems control the flow of more than $6 trillion annually to households, businesses and more nationwide. Tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people across the country rely on the systems, which are responsible for distributing Social Security and Medicare benefits, salaries for federal personnel, payments to government contractors and grant recipients and tax refunds, among tens of thousands of other functions.

Musk’s flunkies, including one 18-year old with only a high school diploma, have also been installed in the Office of Personnel Management [corrected] — the government’s HR department.

Sources within the federal government tell WIRED that the highest ranks of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)—essentially the human resources function for the entire federal government—are now controlled by people with connections to Musk and to the tech industry. Among them is a person who, according to an online résumé, was set to start college last fall.

Scott Kupor, a managing partner at the powerful investment firm Andreessen Horowitz, stands as Trump’s nominee to run the OPM. But already in place, according to sources, are a variety of people who seem ready to carry out Musk’s mission of cutting staff and disrupting the government.

Amanda Scales is, as has been reported, the new chief of staff at the OPM. She formerly worked in talent for xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence company, according to her LinkedIn. Before that, she was part of the talent and operations team at Human Capital, a venture firm with investments in the defense tech startup Anduril and the political betting platform Kalshi; before that, she worked for years at Uber. Her placement in this key role, experts believe, seems part of a broader pattern of the traditionally apolitical OPM being converted to use as a political tool.

Sources say that Riccardo Biasini, formerly an engineer at Tesla and most recently director of operations for the Las Vegas Loop at the Boring Company, Musk’s tunnel-building operation, is also at the OPM as a senior adviser to the director. (Steve Davis, the CEO of the Boring Company, is rumored to be advising Musk on cuts to be made via DOGE and was integral in Musk’s gutting of Twitter, now X, after his takeover of the company in 2022.)

According to the same sources, other people at the top of the new OPM food chain include two people with apparent software engineering backgrounds, whom WIRED is not naming because of their ages.

One thing they’ve done is set up a government-wide email function.

Last week, many federal workers received test emails from the email address [email protected]. In a lawsuit filed last night, plaintiffs allege that a new email list started by the Trump administration may be compromising the data of federal employees.

In their attempts to set up agency- and government-wide emails, Elon’s unelected bureaucrats seem to have taken security filters off at least NOAA’s email system, resulting in noxious spam being sent.

After setting up the government-wide email, someone sent out an email similar to the one Elon sent out when he gutted Xitter, attempting to fool government workers into accepting something misleadingly labeled a buy-out, one not authorized by statute or appropriation.

In a separate email sent on Tuesday entitled “Fork in the Road,” most federal workers were effectively offered an eight-month severance package to leave their jobs, simply by sending [email protected] a message with the word “Resign” in the subject line between now and February 6. Military personnel, postal workers, and national-security and immigration officials are not eligible.

The executive branch has no authority from Congress to offer a mass buyout to federal workers. In fact, the OPM website clearly states that the limit for incentive packages for voluntary resignations is $25,000, far less than eight months’ pay for the average federal worker. Some employees can’t even be offered that.

The way OPM purports to get around this is by defining this as “deferred resignation.” The resignation of the federal worker would be set at September 30, and they will retain full pay and benefits until then and be exempt from return-to-office requirements that are part of one of the Trump executive orders. (This is also a way to not unlawfully reduce salary outlays in federal appropriations for the current fiscal year.) “I understand my employing agency will likely make adjustments in response to my resignation including moving, eliminating, consolidating, reassigning my position and tasks, reducing my official duties, and/or placing me on paid administrative leave until my resignation date,” reads the sample resignation letter. In this sense it is just a future setting of an end date of employment, though the strong implication is that those employees will have nothing to do for the next eight months.

[snip]

This was an Elon Musk operation, through and through. In fact, the “Fork in the Road” email had the same title as one that Elon Musk sent to Twitter when he took over there, informing workers to be “extremely hardcore” or take the resignation offer. The Twitter emails even included the same ask of workers to reply with their decision.

All this access — and almost certainly, some shitty AI — is where the big lie Karoline Leavitt told in her first presser came from.

MS. LEAVITT: There was notice. It was the executive order that the president signed.

There’s also a freeze on hiring, as you know; a regulatory freeze; and there’s also a freeze on foreign aid. And this is a — again, incredibly important to ensure that this administration is taking into consideration how hard the American people are working. And their tax dollars actually matter to this administration.

You know, just during this pause, DOGE and OMB have actually found that there was $37 million that was about to go out the door to the World Health Organization, which is an organization, as you all know, that President Trump, with the swipe of his pen in that executive order, is — no longer wants the United States to be a part of. So, that wouldn’t be in line with the president’s agenda.

DOGE and OMB also found that there was about to be 50 million taxpayer dollars that went out the door to fund condoms in Gaza. That is a preposterous waste of taxpayer money.

Jesse Watters picked up Leavitt’s lie, which in turn led Trump to parrott Watters’ expanded version of it.

It’s possible flunkies installed by African immigrant Elon Musk mistook Africa for the Middle East (of which only Jordan gets contraceptives), because Africa receives condoms from the US (as part of the important PEPFAR anti-AIDS program that even Republican Senators were demanding be resumed when it got shut down).

And this is just what we already know! While it hasn’t been confirmed, I’d bet a good deal of money that Elon’s flunkies were behind shutting down the Medicaid portals early in the week, something that affected health care for people throughout the country.

It has been spectacular failure after failure.

And many of them were directly caused by the immigrant demanding that we get rid of unelected bureaucrats taking democracy away.

101 replies
    • DaveInTheUK says:

      I wish people would stop calling him Elmo.

      Actual Emlo has more compassion, decency and joy in one furry little finger than Musk could ever comprehend.

      • Robert N Eckert says:

        Lone Skum

        [Welcome back to emptywheel. Please use the SAME USERNAME and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment as “Bob Eckert” triggering auto-moderation; it has been edited to reflect your established username. Please check your browser’s cache and autofill; future comments may not publish if username does not match. /~Rayne]

  1. atriana smith says:

    Why is Trump giving access to the Treasury’s sensitive payment systems to an unelected, unaccountable African immigrant, especially one that’s compromised government email systems?

    Why aren’t reporters or Democrats asking this question?

    • goatrodeo says:

      Question: does this data include ALL payees, even to include MOC and SCOTUS and CIA, etc? That’s one heck of a lot of standing for the most powerful and connected people in the country. Feels like a hair on fire moment if there ever was one, and one has to believe there’s going to be a swift counter, has to be?
      My Appeal to Heaven I guess.

    • Howard Cutter says:

      Reporters don’t even seem to be interested in asking about his obvious conflict of interest, since Musk is simultaneously running a government department focusing on “efficiency” and running a company which contracts with the US government. Gee, what are the chances that his department finds those contracts are inefficient and costing the taxpayers too much money? What are the chances DOGE doesn’t propose outsourcing more core NASA functions to SpaceX?

  2. Amicus12 says:

    This post hits on an issue that should be shouted from the rooftops. We have a non-elected individual accessing and communicating over USG computer systems and seizing the levers of government.

    • P J Evans says:

      This is where the media and the Dems could do a lot just by bringing it up at every opportunity. Elmo isn’t a government official, he has no official job (no matter what TFG says), and he has no legal power to make these decisions.

  3. thequickbrownfox says:

    One nitpick: OPM is the Office of Personnel Management

    Its database contains the personal information of every government employee, present and past, as well as every job title and pay grade which each employee has ever held. Musk just waltzed in, set up an email server, and sent an email to everyone presently employed by the federal government. He did it because he can, and nobody can stop him from doing it. Laws cannot prevent any of this, because there isn’t an enforcement mechanism for when an administration chooses to ignore it, or when an administration chooses to ignore court decisions that it doesn’t like, except impeachment and conviction. That isn’t possible any more, and Trump and his minions know it.

  4. Rugger_9 says:

    Apparently the DEI issue screeched about by Convict-1 was put into place under his own 2019 policy.

    As for the rampant, uninformed and uncontrolled cost cutting this is exactly what happened at Twitter when that was bought out. 80% of the work force left and it has opened the door for competitors like Bluesky. Between that, SpaceX, Boring Company, etc. et al, Musk has been an ongoing failure dependent upon others including pinch-hitting gamers to goose his nerd cred.

    Musk is also an illegal immigrant, blowing off his H7 visa for Stanford to work (in violation of said visa). While this may seem trivial, lying about immigration status is a routine cause of revoked naturalization (for example the death camp guards booted out in the 80s). While that is a nice thought these days, it’s also not going to happen…yet.

    The wild card here is the unrelenting and unrepentant egos of Musk and Convict-1. The old saying that two tigers cannot find peace in the same forest rings true here. At some point I suspect Convict-1 (or his minions) will find an excuse to boot Musk out like Vivek was.

    Another problem here is that the crypto project is the perfect vehicle to loot the US Treasury in an undetectable way. The oligarchs will ensure they get their cuts. We’re not done with this by any means even with other events rightfully dominating the news.

    Lastly, what is the actual statutory authority for DOGE? Congress hasn’t authorized it, funded it or organized its structure. This is a problem considering the latest demand to get access to the sensitive financial records at the Department of the Treasury. As I see it, the Musk/DOGE Commissars have no standing to be there at all, much less authority to throw their weight around.

    • P J Evans says:

      People he forced out at the bird hellsite had to sue him because he didn’t pay the promised severance.

      • Rugger_9 says:

        Tim Kaine mentioned that detail when he loudly reminded the federal workers: “don’t take the deal”. Also, let’s remember that ‘buyout’ is also not approved by Congress. Money can’t be spent otherwise.

  5. Savage Librarian says:

    Early on in my employment with the local library, a colleague was chatting with me about some concern she had. I can’t remember what it was. And it was long before I had any problems of my own.

    But as a suggestion I said, if nothing else worked, she could always pursue litigation. She responded by saying employees were forbidden to sue the city. I was shocked that she thought that and asked where she heard it. She said that the HR department told everybody during orientation.

    “They can’t take away your Constitutional rights,” I exclaimed. I remembered this years later before I filed my own lawsuit. And, consequently, I made sure to pursue any available administrative remedies first. In my case it involved the grievance procedure which resulted in a Civil Service hearing (as opposed to union arbitration.) After I lost there, I was able to file litigation.

    I see from the CNN report you included that Kel McClanahan (National Security Counselors) is representing some anonymous federal employees seeking to file a class action lawsuit about security concerns for workers’ private data in the new “President Musk” email distribution system.

    • Savage Librarian says:

      It’s an Administrative Coup. In plain sight. A quiet takeover. How could America have failed so badly!!??!!

      • Matt Foley says:

        I’ll just go ahead and assume Trump’s thugs will steal our HIPAA info next, if he hasn’t already.

        • Rugger_9 says:

          Including, one expects, the pregnancy status of women to be ‘leaked’ to anti-abortion maniacs inside and outside of government.

          The sad thing as noted above is that under color of authority it is harder to seek redress for these criminal acts. Also, according to John Roberts this would be an ‘offical act’ that gets immunity as well.

        • P J Evans says:

          Rugger_9 says:
          January 31, 2025 at 10:51 pm

          I wonder if they’ll include the information for SCCOTUS also.

      • Konny_2022 says:

        To me, it feels more like an act of piracy on the administration than like an administrative coup.

      • thequickbrownfox says:

        The felon-in-chief and his minions know that civil suits take years to get through the legal system. There is no way that the law, as we know it, can deal with this.
        “Your institutions will not save you”.

      • Bill Crowder says:

        As a retired class action lawyer, I can tell you that the hostility of the federal bench toward class actions would make any such litigation very difficult.

        This hostility is one reason that I see what has been described here as an administrative coup as having been going on for many, many years. We have just entered the more publicly recognized phase of it.

    • wetzel-rhymes-with says:

      I believe a primary purpose for Musk with the Office of Personnel Management will be to install AI technology which can continuously monitor the civil service, not only to help the fascist yeomanry manage compliance over other civil servants but also to monitor the fascists. Just like Twitter comments may feed into AI driven personality typing, the government’s own computers will become a guard over its employees. With AI oversight, everyone’s office computer becomes a one way mirror behind which the guard may or may not be. And because it’s an AI, it might be tomorrow that it is looking at yesterday.

      • Rayne says:

        Why does this ^^^ sound like a rationalization or apologia for this possibility?

        Point to the legislation authorizing it.

      • IWantOffThisPlanet says:

        AI tech guy here.

        This is not far-fetched. Piping every byte of every government database into AI, and monitoring for various signs of crimethink, 24×7, is easily within current capabilities. That’s just a start. And then the possibilities for control grow ever-larger from there.

        As for the legislation “authorizing” that. There is none of course. But they will argue that there is none preventing it either. And by the time the suits are filed and the courts are on the case, the proverbial horses won’t just be outside the barn. They’ll be on their way to Mars.

        • Rayne says:

          Uh-huh. Sure. “Piping every byte of every government database into AI” explains the need to take down CDC data.

          No, fuck no. Much of this is simple anarchy intended to sow chaos and identify which components could be sold for cash based on who/what squeals loudest and waves the most money as they do so.

      • originalK says:

        Unless it was developed by China or Russia over the past 4 years, there is no system like this for any U.S. tech company to install in 2 weeks time. It is my understanding that they have taken over a relatively new system, but the reason why government systems are often “out of date” is because they do complex things that take time to develop, and no one wants to scrap what works.

      • P J Evans says:

        I don’t think any system like that exists. Even China has humans doing a lot of the work…and cameras and spies everywhere.

      • Opiwannn says:

        Good luck training that AI to do anything effective beyond barfing up false claims, because even our most advanced models are completely dependent on the quality of their ‘training data’ and the highlighted patterns to identify. They don’t act like a “one-way mirror” with Big Brother possibly sitting behind it, because they can’t recognize even potentially “bad behavior” they haven’t already been trained to find. Note also that machine learning algorithms only allow AI models to improve their performance and efficiency/accuracy at what they’ve already been trained on, NOT to identify anything new. To cap it all off, the amount of processing power that would be necessary to monitor employees across the United States in real time would make the amount processed by the supercomputers at NSA to categorize and translate (and if necessary, decrypt) signals traffic look tiny by comparison.

        NIH on AI capabilities (2023): https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10435961/

        • Rugger_9 says:

          Opiwannn touches upon the fundamental and irrepairable flaw of AI: it’s based upon a model. All models have assumptions and biases built in by the designer and available evidence. For example, what is ‘blue’ and how ‘blue’ is it? One could go to the Pantone definitions but there will be gaps where some variant of blue is rejected as blue even before considering the problem of mixed colors (i.e. when does ‘blue’ become ‘green’?). Even the action to digitize loses context.

          In our current world we have the problem of medical bias regarding treatment responses in women and minorities because those human types weren’t included in the studies to determine effects. Facial recognition software is another gap in common use.

          The more factors affecting a response will create a more complex model which will in turn require more assumptions to keep it a workable tool. Each assumption needs to be tested for validity and given the modern machine learning protocols that doesn’t seem to be the case. Consider the self driving car, whether temporary or autonomous, and how much wreckage and death has already occurred because the model was confused or ignorant about a situation presented to it.

          The Deep Seek AI bombshell this week rings phony to me, it was too good to be true and sounded like any or all of these events occurred:
          1. They cut out steps in validation (which turned up later as ‘massaged’ data).
          2. There was some espionage involved (something the CCP is well known for, and everything is run by the CCP in China).
          3. They left out key factors to goose the success rate.

          All it did was blow a hole in the stock market (NVidia in particular) which was a golden opportunity for those shortiing the market. Note that hedge funds are betting the market will drop because of Convict-1’s policies and tariffs.

        • Rayne says:

          It also seems odd that the entire market appeared to respond to one blogger’s 12K word post about DeepSeek. If only the market similarly responded to one blogger, ever, on matters of national security and civil liberties. *sigh*

        • Rugger_9 says:

          Good point, Rayne.

          The other point about AI is the detection system capability and blind spots. I have collisiion warning on my car and it keeps alarming falsely when it rains because the sensor is blocked / wet and it returns a signal of ‘car’. When I was teaching a 6-sigma class that was an entire period about detection systems, how they worked and what their limitations were.

        • wetzel-rhymes-with says:

          As Wired reports, Musk has attempted to not only access the personal information of millions of Americans, he has also attempted to alter systems vital to the operation of agencies and replace them with “a suite of new AI software … recreating the [GSA] in X’s image.”

  6. FiestyBlueBird says:

    I wonder how long people will still have faith in Treasury Direct savings bonds. Like, will the site function for long?

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      Yes, but is he leaving to spend more time with his family, has he been forced out for being anti-Trump, or is he joining Trump’s WH?

  7. allan_in_upstate says:

    Looks like enforcing Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment might have been a good idea after all.

  8. Raven Eye says:

    Maybe a technical point, but has Musk ever taken the Oath? I would think that either Article VI, or 5 USC 3331 “An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath…” would cover that.

    • Rugger_9 says:

      I doubt he has since DOGE has still not been officially created by Congress much less had any funding appropriated for it. With that said, even if Musk took the oath, he doubtless would honor it as much as Convict-1 does.

      Speaking of which, the purges at the DoJ and FBI continue. In the latter, the victims were told to retire or be fired by Monday, and since everyone saw how spitefully Convict-1 tried to hose McCabe out of his retirement it is no idle threat.

      • Raven Eye says:

        I used to work in a university research project that fell under FACA. We were bringing in reps from a number of commercial sectors and because of the sensitivity of some information discussed, we really had to be careful when it came to meetings that would have non-public discussion. It wasn’t anything we couldn’t manage, but you had to go over every element very carefully.

        As a state employee I had to take an oath, but I don’t recall if there was anything required of those private sector people participating.

      • earlofhuntingdon says:

        “DOGE” has a limited legal existence. A tiny interdepartmental IT unit, with an equally tiny office in the WH, was renamed to add “DOGE” as part of its title. Apart from skirting congressional authorizations, its prime attraction would have been that it’s so small, it has no reporting obligations outside the WH.

        Otherwise, though, its budget has not been updated or its responsibilities enlarged, some of which Congress would have to do. So, he’s still screwing around, because it’s hired staff and gear, which would require money and contracts, and it’s sticking its nose in a lot of key agencies throughout govt.

        • thequickbrownfox says:

          Its budget is ‘off the books’ because it is financed entirely by Muskrat. Everything about it is unofficial. And, it cannot be stopped, because there is no enforcement available within the ‘law’. Our system of ‘checks and balances’ is totally circumvented.
          They’ve come up with a method to fuck us by operating outside of the ‘rules’, which are demonstrated to be strictly voluntary, relying on the good will of those subject to those rules.

  9. Eschscholzia says:

    That “Government-wide email function” violates the 1974 privacy act and several other laws, because it is a “systems of records” with PII, which requires publishing notice explaining what & why in the Federal Register. It and the initial opm.gov emails were created before Musk & co got access to the OPM’s databases of employees and financial transactions.
    It appears to have been compiled by sending email to each department’s all-employee distribution list addresses, with that email requiring all individual recipients reply to that email. That came from outside the departments, so we all got the yellow warning banner “This message comes from outside XXX. Be careful replying or clicking links”. It looked so much like the test messages IT security send out every month or 2 to catch people who click or reply, that the response rate was very low. We may sleepwalk through the annual IT security training (& still pass), but everyone knows the drill on emails. Each dept’s IT security leads then had to send out an email telling staff that message was real and we must reply. The Fork in the Road and several followup emails were then sent via that opm.gov server, which may or may not be actual government equipment & software, and almost certainly does not have “authority to operate” certification which takes months and hundreds of thousands of dollars to obtain.

    Given how many laws were broken with impunity in setting this up, employees I know have no faith that the terms in the emails from OPM (& now from acting dept secretaries) offering “deferred resignation” will actually be honored. [Fun fact: the acting at DOJ slightly edited the form letter they were all supposed to send out, changing the statement that the department asserts the offer is valid and legal to that opm asserts the offer is valid and legal, and tweaking another sentence at the bottom of the email.] Then again, there is no reason to believe the law will be followed in terms of reduction in force, voluntary separation incentive payments, early retirement, or anything else when we don’t take the deferred resignation option.

    So, one can think of the first 10 days as having a large number of fuck ups, but one can also look at the large number of laws broken with impunity, so they can just bulldoze to whatever they want.

    • BRUCE F COLE says:

      Is there any talk among the rank and file there about gathering together for a group legal action?

      And is there any avenue being discussed for suing the bogus DOGE (if that’s the rubric these messages were promulgated under) for violation of gov’t employees’ rights?

  10. harpie says:

    https://bsky.app/profile/djrothkopf.bsky.social/post/3lh2fdo2w222c
    January 31, 2025 at 11:13 AM [formatting altered]

    Watch carefully.
    1] People who do not understand how gov’t or the int’l econ system work
    2] & who are unaware of their own limitations
    3] & [who are] immunized by wealth from the consequences of their actions

    are recklessly tinkering w/the sensitive inner workings of our economy.

    Link to WaPo:
    Senior U.S. official to exit after rift with Musk allies over payment system A top Treasury career staffer, David A. Lebryk announces his retirement. Surrogates of Musk’s DOGE effort had sought access to sensitive payment systems.

    “ARE RECKLESSLY TINKERING” is ALSO TRUE
    re: TRUMP’s STUPID manipulation of the Army Corp of Engineers dams in California.
    [See comments at the Friday’s with Nicole Sandler post]

  11. harpie says:

    I have been absolutely dreading hearing about
    any plans for 7/4/26 from this COUP CREW…
    and here we go:

    https://bsky.app/profile/sethcotlar.bsky.social/post/3lh4rq3qpyk26
    February 1, 2025 at 10:00 AM

    The Trump Admin seems to be getting the old “1776 Project” band together again (under the name of Task Force 250), this time to prepare for the 250th anniversary of Independence in 2026. Notably, this “task force” will be housed in Hegseth’s Department of Defense. [screenshots] [link] [THREAD]

    • harpie says:

      Remember this from 2018?:

      https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1030423480725118976
      7:57 AM · Aug 17, 2018

      The local politicians who run Washington, D.C. (poorly) know a windfall when they see it. When asked to give us a price for holding a great celebratory military parade, they wanted a number so ridiculously high that I cancelled it. Never let someone hold you up! I will instead…
      …. attend the big parade already scheduled at Andrews Air Force Base on a different date, & go to the Paris parade, celebrating the end of the War, on November 11th. Maybe we will do something next year in D.C. when the cost comes WAY DOWN. Now we can buy some more jet fighters!

      https://x.com/MurielBowser/status/1030437239384403968
      8:52 AM · Aug 17, 2018

      Yup, I’m Muriel Bowser, mayor of Washington DC, the local politician who finally got thru to the reality star in the White House with the realities ($21.6M) of parades/events/demonstrations in Trump America (sad).

    • harpie says:

      Then, in 2019:

      https://twitter.com/AaronBlake/status/1145657772643704834
      4:37 AM – 1 Jul 2019

      Trump asks for military tanks on the Mall as part of grandiose July Fourth event [WaPo link]

      […] The ongoing negotiations over whether to use massive military hardware, such as Abrams tanks or Bradley fighting vehicles, as a prop for Trump’s “Salute to America” is just one of many unfinished details when it comes to the celebration planned for Thursday, according to several people briefed on the plan, who requested anonymity to speak frankly.

      White House officials intend to give out tickets for attendees to sit in a VIP section and watch Trump’s speech […]

      Marcy, THEN, with an idea that might work in 2026 also:

      https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1145677664155516934
      5:56 AM – 1 Jul 2019

      Steel this idea: Someone should use their Mall-adjacent public space to broadcast images of Trump’s concentration camps during his July 4 Military Parade and Graft opportunity–so the big donors know what brand they’re buying into.

    • harpie says:

      2019 [cont’d] [there’s a comment in the pokey before this]

      https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1145817649118621698
      3:13 PM – 1 Jul 2019

      Trump says tanks will be stationed outside the National Mall for his July 4th event [VIDEO]

      Quinta Jurecic:
      https://twitter.com/qjurecic/status/1145769138566127618
      12:00 PM – 1 Jul 2019

      A float playing “Grand Old Flag”
      with a giant “Build The Wall” sign just drove down Mass Ave

      I used to like the Fourth of July

  12. Konny_2022 says:

    I found two TPM articles quite interesting in this context:

    “Who Can Stop Elon’s ‘Team’ Wilding Its Way Through the Federal Government?” by Josh Marshall, January 31, 2025 6:17 p.m., and

    “OPM’s Top Lawyer Is A ‘Raging Misogynist’ With A Plan To Break The Civil Service” by
    Josh Kovensky, January 30, 2025 4:02 p.m.

    Marshall thinks the “battle for public opinion” is more important than the battles in court right now, and that it’s important to slow things down by “putting sand in the gears” “as one front in the battle for public opinion.”

    The legal status of what news orgs are now consistently calling “Musk’s team” is high on the list as one way to do this.

    Kovensky gives a lot of background on Andrew Kloster (a name that was unfamiliar to me) who “has publicly expressed a clear vision of how to destroy the federal workforce’s nonpartisan identity and bring it under Trump’s direct sway.”

    I could provide the links if necessary (don’t know whether TMP links are considered reliable).

    • Ginevra diBenci says:

      Konny, thank you for these recommendations. I was particularly interested in the (self-described!) “misogynist” lawyer at OPM. My own research deals primarily with the sucking undertow of misogyny fueling the Trump presidencies and movement; the article doesn’t explore that, but it does conclude with this quote from Kloster (the misogynist lawyer) speaking at a Yale Law Fed Soc meeting in 2022:

      “‘…I mean, with Trump, everything was personal,’ he said. ‘If Trump had died during his four years in office, who knows what would’ve happened because everything really did go to him. And the last person in the room with him might always win the argument or whatever. There are all these critiques, but it was him. He was the institution.’”

      I’m inferring that the difference now is The Plan. And the plan really is Project 2025. Trump himself has become vestigial, the living relic of his own sainthood. Those of us who read Project 2025 feel queasy recognition pretty much every time one of these moves gets reported. Kovensky notes that what the administration is doing now is against the law. But…so what? These people are the law now.

      • Savage Librarian says:

        Control Freaks

        In Project 2025, Trump is on overdrive
        Freedom cannot survive, we will find

        In Project 2025
        Domination, subjugation everyday
        Everything you think, do and say
        No more free will, it’s gone away

        In Project 2025
        They’ll take away your beliefs
        Replaced by lies
        You won’t find what you once knew
        No one’s gonna care for you

        In Project 2025
        Concerns being crimped on your side
        Trump’s thugs give nothin’ to you
        His machine’s makin’ that come true

        In Project 2025
        You’ll see the husbands rise
        But not the wives
        The sons can rule
        and treat daughters cruel
        Thugs will control contraceptive tools

        In Project 2025
        Republic expunged
        Government jobs won’t survive
        Job security will take a nosedive
        Trump’s clones will drone in their sick hive

        In Project 2025
        Trump is gonna shake us up again
        But this time liberty won’t be alive
        This time only tyrants will thrive

        In Project 2025
        Democracy is gutted
        by their conniving design
        Fascists take everything
        that old Trump can give
        They leave us nothing to live

        We’ve been through Trump’s Putin years
        Trump hangs out in Orbán’s spheres
        O’Sullivan pass through
        Danube Institute
        We know how it is spun:
        Heritage Foundation
        They take free will away
        And they won’t let us have our say

        In Project 2025, Trump is on overdrive
        Freedom cannot survive, we will find

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKQfxi8V5FA

        “Zager & Evans – In the Year 2525”

        7/12/24

  13. earthworm says:

    “MUSK”
    those of us who read Redwall, Mossflower, and others of Brian Jacques’ series to our children know that the bad guys, the stoats, ferrets, and weasels, are members of the mustelid family, which gets its name in part from production of musk, a foul smelling secretion of anal glands.
    perhaps OT, and at the expense of demonizing innocent animals, how appropriate.

    • -mamake- says:

      To earthworm:
      HUGE Brian Jacques fans here. Our childs favorite books by a long shot. Big treat – driving 2-3 hours out of state to seen Jacques talk and sign books for us. Sometimes it makes the parent happier than the child!
      Thanks for the reminder of sweeter times.

  14. P J Evans says:

    As as I can tell the only actual unqualified DEI hires in the government are at the top. The rest – the ones what are being pushed out – are all good at their jobs.

      • Rugger_9 says:

        Maybe Musk and his commissars are holding them off, but we haven’t heard from DJTJ, Eric or Ivanka in any substantial way. Nor have we heard from Roger Stone, not normally known as a wallflower.

        We did hear about Michael Flynn because he was involved in the Lutheran Family Services defunding (they provide senior care to a lot of the northern tier) and since Mikey is a known foreign asset, why was he involved in that decision?

        This goes back to forcing Convict-1 to sign every EO and decision to do this nonsense, because it removes any plausible deniability for the mob boss.

  15. Cheez Whiz says:

    You call it failure, they call it all going according to plan, wher “plan” is cripple the regulatory and bureaucratic state. The DEI scrubbing is busywork and theater for the rubes, a signal to the faithful in government there’s a new sherriff in town who’s serious about kicking ass. If the Democratic party is remotely serious about opposing this, the zeroth thing to do is establish a propaganda departmemt to coordinate the message that they are fighting tooth and nail, and the 1st thing is to file a flood of lawsuits over all the supposedly “illegal” acts the administration is doing. Other than some sort of guerilla sabotage campaign within the federal bureaucracy and an obstruction campaign in the Senate that would make Mitch McConnell blush, the courts are the only place for positive action.

  16. harpie says:

    https://bsky.app/profile/capitolhunters.bsky.social/post/3lh3bvo7ioc2v
    January 31, 2025 at 7:44 PM

    The situation at DOJ and FBI is a 5-alarm fire now with democracy at stake. The Acting Director of the FBI [Discroll] is ordered to turn over the names of every agent who worked on a Jan 6. At DOJ over 25 prosecutors just fired who worked on Jan 6 cases. It’s dictatorship if this stands. 1/
    […]
    3/ Ed Martin, Acting US Attorney for DC, is directing the firings:
    1]a Stop the Steal rally speaker,
    2] sat with Mike Flynn at the Ellipse on Jan 6,
    then 3] went to the Capitol to watch. Not a strategic leader but an eager propagandist,
    who 4] partied with fake electors while the attack unfolded. Lawlessness. 4/

    The Streisand effect will bite Ed: the more he tries to delete Jan 6 the more newsworthy it becomes. They cannot erase it – TBs of data are already at institutions out of the US. The more people he fires, the more interesting it is to ask: what happened, to make such a desperate need to erase it? 5/

    “They cannot erase it”…that’s what the judges are writing as well.

    • harpie says:

      Kyle Cheney:

      https://bsky.app/profile/kyledcheney.bsky.social/post/3lh36xi3b4u2t
      January 31, 2025 at 6:52 PM

      NEWS: Around 25-30 prosecutors who handled Jan. 6 cases were abruptly fired Friday afternoon. Acting US Attorney Ed Martin sent the email just before 5pm. Details w/ @joshgerstein.bsky.social

      In memo, Emil Bove adopted Trump’s characterzation of J6 prosecutions as “a grave national injustice” — a description judges who handled those cases have rejected

      It says those prosecutors were installed in a “subversive” move by outgoing Biden admin. [link]

      Links to:
      DOJ fires dozens of prosecutors who handled Jan. 6 cases It’s the latest extraordinary purge of officials Donald Trump has deemed adversarial to his interests. 01/31/2025 06:50 PM EST // Updated: 01/31/2025 07:55 PM EST

      […] In endorsing the firings, Bove embraced Trump’s characterization of Jan. 6 prosecutions as a “grave national injustice,” a description that several federal judges have flatly rejected in recent orders related to those cases.

      “There has been no ‘grave national injustice,’” U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman wrote in a Thursday ruling. “And just because the proclamation was signed by the president does not transform up into down or down into up as if peering through the looking glass of Alice in Wonderland.” [links to Doc] […]

      • Rayne says:

        Sure looks like more retaliatory firings and not terminations for cause.

        Which is a violation of federal law.

        Wondering how long it will be before a lawsuit is filed, given the number of fired attorneys.

        • Savage Librarian says:

          Oh, the CNN article is actually in this post. The lawsuit is not about retaliation, but the embedded filing does anticipate a RIF:

          “Someone literally walked into our building and plugged in an email server to our network to make it appear that emails were coming from OPM. It’s been the one sending those various “test” message you’ve all seen. We think they’re building a massive email list of all federal employees to generate mass RIF notices down the road.”

          Here’s the article Marcy cited in her post above:

          “Lawsuit alleges new Trump administration email system for federal employees raises privacy concerns” – Tierney Sneed, 1/27/25

          “A White House official told CNN last week that President Donald Trump may use the new system to communicate directly with government workers, however, its broader use is still being discussed.”
          …..
          “Plugging in a new email server for the sole purpose of sending messages directly to every federal employee is an invitation to be hacked, and every employee out there needs to know how much of their data is at risk,” McClanahan said, adding that the system should be shut down “until OPM treats this data with the security it warrants.”

          https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/27/politics/federal-employees-email-system-privacy-concerns-lawsuit/index.html

        • Ciel babe says:

          Hoping the fired attorneys lead the charge for all the rest. Many friends in fed agencies. Some smart people are convinced that the hr “fork in the road’ email is a 100% legit OPM server, that any detected defiance could cost them jobs/retirement/harassment so they are going to hunker down and comply because they can’t afford the individual cost of doing otherwise. This includes no communication with external work colleagues, including organizations being funded by their groups – no answering calls or emails, no acknowledging emails are received… there is a deep resignation around how it doesn’t matter if what happens is a violation of federal law, it’s happening, and no one is standing up to it or stopping it. That’s how it feels. Hoping for glimmers of push back next week.

    • harpie says:

      Here’s a THREAD of comments about the 1/5/21 Rally Ed Martin spoke at:

      https://www.emptywheel.net/2021/08/20/reuters-doesnt-mention-terrorism-when-discussing-the-january-6-investigation/#comment-900481

      Martin was one of the signers of the 4/17/20 Conservative Action Project letter to BARR. Info here:
      https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/01/27/billy-b-and-johnny-d-drank-whiskey-before-the-special-counsel-appointment/#comment-979835

      […] We know well that you share our devotion to America’s Constitutional liberties, and we are grateful that you are in a unique position to act decisively in their defense.

  17. Booksellerb4 says:

    Maybe it’s all the popcorn I’ve been consuming lately, but the recent events at OPM & the Treasury Dept remind me of a movie plot…Ocean’s 11 anyone?

    Follow the money!

  18. Rugger_9 says:

    The DOGE commissars seem very much like mob lackeys sent out to collect tribute so the bosses have plausible deniability. The targets are well aware that if they resist the commissars then EOs will follow immediately, but make Convict-1 sign them to ensure ownership later.

    It will be dark times for a while, but since Musk and his commissars still do not have any valid government authority it is only a matter of time that someone can raise it in litigation. I am aware about the comment above regarding the lack of interest in class actions at the federal level, but all one really needs is a tort and the way these commissars have been acting it will be easy to find one. It will get more traction when a red state governor / resident squeals first.

    Does anyone else recall the notorious Stanford study that had to be stopped because the ‘guards’ became so sadistic because they were unrestrained? We have that here, and we already have multiple challenges to law violations. The sooner Roberts gives up the unlimited immunity interpretation the better.

    • Boycurry says:

      I wouldn’t hold my breath on Roberts. But, wait for social security checks to stop showing up in accounts before Republican Senators make any noise.

      • P J Evans says:

        We get a *lot* of stuff from Canada, Mexico, and China. Their constituents are going to be among the first to notice, since they’re in states that have had lower gas prices for the last 10 years.

        • Ciel babe says:

          Found it! The video clip remains a classic. Ben Stein as history teacher:
          “In 1930, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, in an effort to alleviate the effects of the… Anyone? Anyone?… the Great Depression, passed the… Anyone? Anyone? The tariff bill? The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act? Which, anyone? Raised or lowered?… raised tariffs, in an effort to collect more revenue for the federal government. Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the United States sank deeper into the Great Depression.”

  19. Rugger_9 says:

    Now, we have the NTSB proclamation that they will only announce updates on Xitter for the last couple of crashes. There are a couple of things wrong here:

    1. Favoring one (privately owned non-government) platform in this way violates the law.
    2. Does anyone really think that Musk and his commissars will not exert editorial control over what gets posted? They have to keep their deplorables happy with the news.
    3. Does anyone think that funneling news through Xitter isn’t going to be monetized to benefit Musk? Remember that Xitter has been dying since Musk acquired it.

    It will be interesting to see how the courtier press responds to this restriction on their access, given how much they have valued access above truth-telling.

  20. Rugger_9 says:

    Over at Treasury, the DOGE commissars now have the ability to stop payments they don’t like (this has been reported before) and forced out the Treasury official that questioned their authority (Lebryk, also reported before). My simple question is this:

    How is this not a de facto line item veto? Line item vetos are not permitted by the Constitution in spite of litigated efforts by Presidents of both parties to get one. So, something like this (even if it’s called ‘impoundment’) defeats the power of the purse and it’s an indication of how feckless MAGA Mike Johnson and his caucus is that they aren’t already up in arms. It’s only a matter of time before their districts get hit.

    • Rugger_9 says:

      Now the Consumer Financial Protection Board head has been fired. I’m more amazed it took this long considering how much the banksters hate Warren’s agency.

    • gmokegmoke says:

      I don’t know enough to endorse all these groups but it might be an interesting and useful discussion:

      https://www.mobilize.us/indivisible/event/752072/
      This Sunday night, February 2 at 8pm ET/5pm PT, you’re invited to join Indivisible, MoveOn, Working Families Party, and a coalition of other organizations for an action call. During the call, you will hear key movement leaders from across the country as they give us their best strategic guidance on how to take action against the Trump funding freezes!

Comments are closed.