The Whole World is Watching, Trump Edition

A Pile of Doozies, waiting to be signed

There are some real doozies among the executive orders that were signed yesterday. As Marcy noted, the pardons were certainly among them. There is also the irony of opening up ANWR for drilling once more and exploiting Alaska’s environmental resources, while at the same time stopping the offshore continental shelf leases to wind farms,

with due consideration for a variety of relevant factors, including the need to foster an energy economy capable of meeting the country’s growing demand for reliable energy, the importance of marine life, impacts on ocean currents and wind patterns, effects on energy costs for Americans –- especially those who can least afford it –- and to ensure that the United States is able to maintain a robust fishing industry for future generations and provide low cost energy to its citizens.

I guess Alaskan fish and the Arctic Ocean are on their own.

There is also an EO giving now-Secretary of State his marching orders:

Section 1.  Purpose.  From this day forward, the foreign policy of the United States shall champion core American interests and always put America and American citizens first.

Sec. 2.  Policy.  As soon as practicable, the Secretary of State shall issue guidance bringing the Department of State’s policies, programs, personnel, and operations in line with an America First foreign policy, which puts America and its interests first.

“And don’t you forget it, Little Marco!” was apparently deleted from the final version that was signed.

It’s not just Americans watching all this play out on Day One. Around the world, the heads of intelligence services of friends and foes alike were no doubt watching as well, to see what was just campaign rhetoric and what Trump actually followed through on with action. The EO that really made me sit up and take notice and most certainly caught their attention was this one:

The Executive Office of the President requires qualified and trusted personnel to execute its mandate on behalf of the American people.  There is a backlog created by the Biden Administration in the processing of security clearances of individuals hired to work in the Executive Office of the President.  Because of this backlog and the bureaucratic process and broken security clearance process, individuals who have not timely received the appropriate clearances are ineligible for access to the White House complex, infrastructure, and technology and are therefore unable to perform the duties for which they were hired.  This is unacceptable.

Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order:

1.  The White House Counsel to provide the White House Security Office and Acting Chief Security Officer with a list of personnel that are hereby immediately granted interim Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI) security clearances for a period not to exceed six months; and

2.  That these individuals shall be immediately granted access to the facilities and technology necessary to perform the duties of the office to which they have been hired; and

3.  The White House Counsel, as my designee, may supplement this list as necessary; and

4.  The White House Counsel, as my designee, shall have the authority to revoke the interim clearance of any individual as necessary.

The introduction blaming the Biden administration for screwing up the process for getting security clearances is a red herring. This EO is straight up slamming the FBI for not immediately giving clearances to his favored people back in 2017. But beyond that . . . wow.

Do you remember how things began for Trump in 2017? As I wrote in 2022, when the FBI executed a search warrant on Mar-a-Lago seeking (and finding) missing very sensitive national security documents, Trump had a history of shoddy security practices dating back to the very beginning of his first administration.

On May 15, 2017, a disturbing story hit the news:

President Donald Trump disclosed highly classified information to Russia’s foreign minister about a planned Islamic State operation, two U.S. officials said on Monday, plunging the White House into another controversy just months into Trump’s short tenure in office.

The intelligence . . . was supplied by a U.S. ally in the fight against the militant group, both officials with knowledge of the situation said.

H.R. McMaster categorically denied it, and as the story unfolded over time, McMaster was lying through his teeth. The unnamed ally was later revealed to be Israel, who had a mole inside an ISIS cell. And Trump blithely blew the cover of that Israeli asset by bragging to Lavrov.

Shortly after this meeting (at which Trump also bragged about just having fired James Comey), US intelligence officials made a bold move. From CNN:

In a previously undisclosed secret mission in 2017, the United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government, multiple Trump administration officials with direct knowledge told CNN.

A person directly involved in the discussions said that the removal of the Russian was driven, in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy.

The decision to carry out the extraction occurred soon after a May 2017 meeting in the Oval Office in which Trump discussed highly classified intelligence with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak. The intelligence, concerning ISIS in Syria, had been provided by Israel.

This was the opening act of the Trump presidency. From the very beginning, intelligence officers worried about how Trump handled classified information. Our intelligence officers worried, and so did the intelligence officers of our allies, as they asked themselves some version of the question “Will Trump say something or do something that will get us killed?” In a completely different way, so did the intelligence officers of our adversaries. If Trump were to rashly reveal something he learned about the capabilities of our adversaries, it could have disastrous consequences for those countries and their leaders, as the reaction to the revelation could easily spiral out of control in unforeseeable ways.

And the damage was done.

Fast forward to today, and imagine you are the head of the German Bundesnachrichendienst, the Australian Secret Intelligence Service, the Israeli Mossad, or any of the intelligence agencies with whom we regularly share intelligence. This EO says that Trump is giving a six-month waiver to the background check requirement. What could possibly go wrong?

Now imagine you are the head of the intelligence service of an unfriendly country. How large is your smile?

Just as they watched Biden’s new team in 2021, all the foreign intelligence services are watching Trump today. Yes, they are taking note of Trump indicating the US is withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement, and also the World Health Organization. But screwing with security clearances in the White House is on another level.

Little Secretary of State Marco is going to have a lot of work to do, trying to clean up this mess. This kind of thing will turn “America First” into “America Alone,” at least when it comes to sharing intelligence among allies.

And finally, imagine you are a senior person in the CIA, NSA, or another US intelligence agency. Imagine you are an agent in the field, passing sensitive information through your handler back to Langley. How many agents are going to ask to be pulled out? How many agents are going to “go dark” for a time, cutting off the flow of information they had been sending? And how many potential sources are going to rethink any idea of cooperating with US intelligence services, and decide to go to the Germans, the British, or others instead of the US — or decide it’s not worth cooperating with any western country?

The whole world is watching, and it’s not a pretty picture. Unless, of course, you are a certain former KBG agent, who is even more elated today than he was on November 9th.

68 replies
  1. Peterr says:

    Well, isn’t this interesting? From the NYT:

    Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, is likely to be given office space in the West Wing, putting him close to President Trump as Mr. Musk steers a project that aims to cut as much as $2 trillion in government spending, two people with knowledge of the planning said on Monday.

    Mr. Musk had been expected to be situated in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, which is in the White House complex but not in the West Wing proper. But he has for many days been asking about his level of access, signaling a desire for proximity to Mr. Trump, according to the people.

    Mr. Trump had wanted Mr. Musk to have the space, one of the people said. Mr. Musk has been given a badge for the White House complex and was said to be working there on Monday. He has filled out paperwork to be brought onboard for the role and already has a government email address.

    Leave aside the politics here, and think about the logistics. Can you imagine how long it would take for a security clearance for Musk to be processed? With all his foreign travel, all his contacts with folks of dubious reputations overseas, all his various residences, etc., it would take ages.

    But now, with the wave of a pen, Musk is presumably on the list of the WH Counsel’s Office to receive a TS/SCI clearance. Given the breadth of his remit as the head of DOGE, he could arguably make the case that he has a need to know anything at all that any US government office or official does, as part of his task to streamline the work of the government.

    Two thoughts leap to mind:

    (1) There’s no way Musk would use any insider information learned through his DOGE work to improperly benefit himself and his companies, right?

    (2) What could possibly go wrong?

    I notice that the lead reporter on the story is Mar-a-Lago Maggie, joined by Jonathan Swan, Charlie Savage, and Theodore Schleifer. I further notice that there is no discussion of this instant temporary security clearance executive order in their story.

    *sigh*

    • SteveBev says:

      Somewhere on the long list of how problematic Musks proximity to power is for foreign allies, the revelations that he gets a desk very Oval Office adjacent AND a #TrumpWillsIt level of ‘vetted’ security clearance is bound to cause ‘U.K. Government Officials’ (ie spooks) to steeple their fingers, and the heirs to Smiley to polish their spectacles.

      It’s not as if he wasn’t on the radar, much.
      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgmy71rgreno.amp

      • AndreLgreco says:

        POTUS Vult

        [Welcome back to emptywheel. Please use the SAME username AND EMAIL ADDRESS each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment with a different email address triggering auto-moderation; it has been edited to reflect your established address. Please check your browser’s cache and autofill; future comments may not publish if email address does not match. We don’t even require a working/valid email address, only the same address with each comment. /~Rayne]

    • Ed Walker says:

      Maggie and Charlie: documenting the atrocities they and their colleagues enabled and getting rich.

      I canceled my scubscription to the NYT after the 90th Biden is Old article. I use the money to pay independent sources I can trust: including The American Prospect, and a bunch of smart substackers.

      I’m also deleting my twitter account using Redact, and will delete the account shortly. Find me at Bluesky.

      • Discontinued Barbie says:

        Thank you for sharing.

        I have been trying to find good resources to read for news.

        Does anyone else have suggestions for good news resources?

        • Matt___B says:

          Harry Litman’s YT channel Talking Feds
          Marc Elias’ YT channel Democracy Docket
          Pro Publica
          Mehdi Hasan’s YT channel Zeteo

        • Ed Walker says:

          If I had to pick just one it would be Heather Cox Richardson’s Letters To An American.

          Also
          Parker Malloy
          Judd Legum
          Aaron Rupar
          Looking at The Contrarian: they flood my inbox but with pretty good stuff
          Mike Lux
          Steve Vladek
          Legal stuff: Slate, with Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern.

          And, of course, this site.

        • Ithaqua0 says:

          The Atlantic and Pro Publica. Canceled WAPO and the NYT. Slate. The Bulwark for commentary and various other substacks (Jen Rubin among others).

        • punaise says:

          Subscribe to The Atlantic, New Yorker, The Sun.

          Commentary and analysis sites (donate/subscribe):
          here, of course
          Digby’s Hullaballoo
          Talking Points Memo
          Charles P Pierce @ Esquire.com
          New York Magazine’s The Intelligencer
          Daily Kos
          Washington Monthly

          New York Times for Wordle (current streak 214), Connections, Spelling Bee

        • Ginevra diBenci says:

          I get my news from Wonkette. With a backdrop of MSNBC (Nicolle Wallace, Chris Hayes, Lawrence O’Donnell, and Rachel when she’s storytelling about history and/or obscure current stuff I never would have known otherwise) and NPR, to the extent I can stand either one, and as background noise to distract from chronic tinnitus.

          Knowledge and wisdom? For those I come here.

      • harpie says:

        Adding to this great list:

        Daniel Nichanian and Bolts: boltsmag.org
        Chris Geidner and LawDork: lawdork.com
        Wendy Siegelman and NewsTracs: newstracs.com

        • harpie says:

          I can’t remember where I found the following, but I think it might be good:

          https://bsky.app/profile/piscolitty.bsky.social/post/3lg7qnp6zu224
          January 20, 2025 at 8:53 PM

          Today I am announcing a weekly newsletter released every Monday that puts a spotlight on MAGA corruption and promotes strong Democrats. We will meticulously catalog Trump’s revenge tour and corrupt actions.

          First article just went live: [link]

          They are going to be busy!

        • Rayne says:

          I hope the person(s) who kept track of Trump’s time on the golf course resumes their effort as well.

          Will make for some dark humor to compare how much time TFG spends on corruption versus golfing — we’re literally going to have to hope for more golfing.

        • Peterr says:

          Replying to Rayne at 11:59

          From what I’ve heard of Trump’s golfing, that’s where he practices his corruption, honing his skills at lying, bending/ignoring the rules, and daring anyone to stop him from doing so.

        • Rayne says:

          Reply to Peterr at 4:59 pm ET

          If he’s busy using his foot wedge he can’t get into as much trouble. I’m more worried about what he does in the dining room at Mar-a-Lago given his past history of letting cronies gather there to coordinate taking over federal services, ex. VA and the golf trio.

        • punaise says:

          It’s a trap! Trump has no problem taking away in-divot-you-all liberties.

          Any venue that he golfs at sees an immediate spike in its coarse rating.

  2. Bears7485 says:

    The forthcoming intelligence shit-show is going to leave us vulnerable to another major attack on our soil, isn’t it?

    • RipNoLonger says:

      That’s a good guess. Not that we aren’t already vulnerable but the gates have been flung open.

      • john paul jones says:

        It will likely be a cyber attack that shuts down infrastructure and will be difficult to attribute to anyone in particular because Trump’s version of the IC will be discouraged from doing so. Recall all the shenanigans Trump’s appointees caused at the CDC trying to downplay the epidemic.

  3. P J Evans says:

    The rest of the planet isn’t going to trust the US government for a long, long time. And they’re absolutely correct.

    • Ed Walker says:

      Yes. The traitors will put a bunch of young traitors into the various agencies, and rooting them out will be extremely difficult.

    • Wild Bill 99 says:

      America First is America Alone. After all, not alone would imply together with others, a state unlikely when you perceive your own interests to be ahead of everyone else. From family to nations it has been the presumption that communal behavior has been a major part of human survival (as well as in many other species). The rugged individualists routinely ignore the evidence of their own existence.

  4. Krisy Gosney says:

    I’m not advocating for it, just pointing it out, but one way to root out those young traitors would be by profiling by specific corporate religious and religion based organization affiliations.

  5. Matt Foley says:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/flood-the-zone-nyt-report-reveals-top-trump-aide-s-plan-to-crush-foes/ar-AA1xkw1c

    The New York Times has written a lengthy profile of top Trump aide Stephen Miller, who will be more powerful than ever in the president-elect’s second White House.

    The profile contains a number of tidbits about Miller’s strategy for the second Trump term that will include radical executive orders aimed at curbing immigration into the United States.

    “He believes that those he regards as Mr. Trump’s enemies — Democrats, the media, groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and portions of the federal bureaucracy — are depleted and only have so much bandwidth for outrage and opposition,” writes the Times. “Mr. Miller has told people that the goal is to overwhelm them with a blitz of activity.”

        • dopefish says:

          When the Nazis won 37% of the vote in the summer of 1932, and it looked like Hitler was about to become Chancellor, Goebbels wrote in his diary that they would never surrender power. “They will have to drag us out as corpses.”

          I fear that this Trump regime sees themselves the same way. Rather than the temporary Administration of a democratic government that existed before them and will still exist after, they just see power. Now that they have it, why would they give it up?

  6. Joel Clifford says:

    And then there is Stewart Rhodes and Enrique Tarrio unleashed into the populace along with 1500 other domestic terrorists . Emboldened as the United States Government endorses political violence.

  7. zscoreUSA says:

    I’m not sure if it made it into an Executive Order or not, but Trump stated he was going to get to the bottom of the UFO/drone stuff and release all of the JFK/RFK/MLK files.

    Anybody have a good explanation for what’s been going on with the UFO and drone stuff? Congressional hearings, alleged whistleblowers, drones, etc. Whats really going on here.

    • john paul jones says:

      A lot of the so-called UFO footage shows objects moving in ways that can be explained by parallax, that is, regular earth objects, but seen from other moving platforms, thus, confusing for the eye and brain to sort out. Whatever these objects are, they are highly unlikely to be aliens visiting earth.

      For JFK, Vincent Bugliosi’s “Reclaiming History” is still a good starting place.

      • HikaakiH says:

        I pay little attention to such things but am aware that some ‘UFO footage’ is the result of optical artifacts of the equipment used to record it.

      • zscoreUSA says:

        Yes, unlikely to be aliens, but there are Congressional hearings, so there is probably funding on the table. Possibly some lucrative government contracts.

        As far Bugliosi, I take anything he writes with a grain of salt. With the Manson prosecution, he walked off any connection to intelligence or law enforcement activity. Through the LSD scene or as a police informant. His book on JFK has the reputation for upholding the official government position.

  8. PeteT0323 says:

    [OFF TOPIC] Dropping this here as I found it fascinating to me and have also read several other missives highly consistent with the point(s) made.

    Why America Can’t USE The Oil it DRILLS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_l1cj_AyR1E

    It’s best to watch the video or if you happen to have a similar narrative reference then please also post links to them.

    In summary the gist of it is that almost all of the oil the USA now extracts is light/sweet crude a lot of which comes from shale and/or fracking.

    Our refining infrastructure is almost exclusive designed for legacy USA crude which is heavy/sour crude oil.

    You cannot refine sweet/light crude using heavy/sour infrastructure or vice versa AFAIK.

    I do not know what kind of oil comes out of ANWR.

    And it is true for a time during the Trump admin and into Biden’s that we were the world’s #1 crude oil (of all kinds) extractor. I believe now we are maybe #3.

    The point is that crude we extract cannot be used – directly – by us and so it goes on the open market and USA oil industry profits while we do not directly benefit from it. We then import the heavy/sour crude we can refine at market prices.

    Yeah, I know Biden winged the cartel with a fast one a while back.

    Oil refiners are not incentivized to build infrastructure for light/sweet crude processing – why would they?

    The oil industry is happy to “double dip profit” on the sale of light/sweet crude they export and profit on the heavy/sour they import.

    We, the consumer, get squeezed even though the price of refined crude (and not just fuel) costs more are than it could/should.

    And don’t get me started on legacy energy subsidies on top of all that.

    Drill Baby Drill is yet another cute sound bite – like Make America Great Again – that when repeated often enough make sense to the rabble.

    [Moderator’s note: First, note off-topic content as just that; I’ve done it for you. Second, the situation you’ve described hasn’t changed for decades — it’s not time sensitive and could have waited for an open thread. Third, tighten up your writing; this comment is 2-3X too long, with far too many line breaks forcing readers using mobile devices to scroll-scroll-scroll. /~Rayne]

  9. Depressed Chris says:

    As someone with a clearance, I have to fill out a comprehensive and invasive form(SF-86) that would, if he were not President, easily disqualify Trump from holding a clearance for a bunch of reasons. Given his past, I have no doubt that he will “monetize” the national security of this country. I expect that Russia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and any nation that has an authoritarian leader who Trump idolizes will gain insights that they should not be given. I also expect that his National Security Council will invent a pretext for a war with the PRC as a companion to his trade policies. All bets are off as his questionable minions will also bargain away whatever classified access they have for money, business favors, or just because they won’t care and will enjoy the thrill of being an ersatz spy. If I were our allies, I would think twice about sharing any knowledge with us.

    [Welcome back to emptywheel. Please use the SAME USERNAME and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment as “Forgot_My_Name_Help_Me_Rayne” triggering auto-moderation; it has been edited to reflect your established username. Please check your browser’s cache and autofill; future comments may not publish if username does not match. PLEASE MAKE A NOTE OF YOUR USERNAME; I am not your secretary and I’m quite busy. /~Rayne]

  10. pdaly says:

    Well 18 state attorneys general from Democratic states as well as D.C. and the city and county of San Francisco wasted no time on Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship by filing a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in MA.
    Not sure whether the listed order (which is not alphabetical) is significant, but the first state listed is NJ followed by MA, CA, CO, etc.

    San Francisco includes the detail that their city is the birthplace of Wong Kim Ark (SCOTUS decision in 1898 in the case United States v. Wong Kim Ark affirmed his right to U.S. citizenship by birth).

    https://www.mass.gov/doc/birthright-citizenship-eo-complaint/download

    I noticed New Hampshire (with current Gov and AG who are both Republican) is not part of the suit. Fortunately, ACLU New Hampshire (along with ACLU ME and ACLU MA) filed suit in U.S. District Court in New Hampshire on the same day as above AG suit.

    WBUR, the local Boston NPR news station, helpfully provides the link (pdf).
    https://media.wbur.org/wp/2025/01/0176.pdf

    From what I’ve read the two cases are likely to be consolidated if and when they reach the appellate level.
    So the ACLU is helping New Hampshire republicans to follow Prof. Timothy Snyder’s first word of advice when battling authoritarians (and presidents who do not faithinfully execute the law): Do Not Obey In Advance.

  11. thequickbrownfox says:

    What I find extremely weird, is that there are states that don’t even ask the birthplace of the parents. My very red birth state doesn’t, so how would the federal government even know? Birth Certificates are issued by the State Office of Vital Records, not by the feds.

    • pdaly says:

      In genealogy, using state-certified birth certificates (called “long form” birth certificates in some places/countries) is more helpful when building family trees than are local birth certificates, because state-certified certificates will likely include birth parents’ names including mother’s maiden name, their ages at time of baby’s birth, and their own country of birth–while local/city birth certificates will often skip the latter details.

      • P J Evans says:

        Some states used to collect that info routinely – my birth cert includes that information. It’s about the size of a 4×6 card, going by the microfilm print. (My mother signed it.)

    • RobertS721 says:

      This is precisely why “End birthright citizenship” is profoundly stupid.

      The end result is that countless millions of Americans are no longer citizens. There’s no end to it – the vast majority of Americans came here from elsewhere. Where does it stop?

      Josh Marshall has a good explainer here:

      https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/day-two/sharetoken/79bcdc2e-2ccd-4598-a05c-402e40360cf7

      [Welcome back to emptywheel. SECOND REQUEST: Please use the same username each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You published this comment as “RobertS”; you have also commented as RobertS_3141, Robert_S, RobertS, Robert Sexton, and Robert. This comment has been edited to match your last username compliant with the site’s 8-letter minimum standard. Make of note of it, and stick with it as future mismatches may not clear for publication. /~Rayne]

      • earlofhuntingdon says:

        That’s the point. It won’t stop, because it’s about instilling a state of permanent fear and submission, the only way dictators can remain dictators.

        If you demonstrate that you can shred the Constitution to impose drastic punishment on the weak, you can do anything.

  12. harpie says:

    TRUMP is now whining about the first “Nasty Woman” of the second round: Bishop Mariann Budde

    https://bsky.app/profile/dianabutlerbass.bsky.social/post/3lgdfbx6t6k2r
    January 22, 2025 at 7:41 AM

    You’ve certainly seen the controversy and cruelty
    over the last three minutes of this sermon.

    But watch the entire thing. It is less than 15 minutes.
    You’ll be inspired and strengthened for theological and spiritual resistance.

    The First Sermon [LINK]

    Links to:
    The First Sermon The parts you probably didn’t hear
    Diana Butler Bass Jan 22, 2025

    I know that many of you aren’t watching the news this week. But I imagine that you’ve heard about Bishop Mariann Budde’s sermon at the Washington National Cathedral yesterday. The final three minutes [link] — when she pleaded for mercy toward LGBTQ people, immigrants, and children — have gone viral around the world, prompting predictable politicization, outrage, and division. (The clip I’ve linked above has the final reaction of Trump and Vance in the seconds after she finished. Don’t miss that part.) [my emphasis][…]

  13. Dark Phoenix says:

    Meanwhile, the Free Palestine members are all over BlueSky high-fiving each other and celebrating that they’ve “saved Gaza” by not voting and letting Trump in, because they’ve decided HE is the one who worked on the ceasefire and thus will stop Bibi from continuing the murder-fest…

    • Ginevra diBenci says:

      “It happens.” Yes, presidents pardon folks we wish they hadn’t. Before Trump they never did it on Day One, or for violent criminals whose violent acts had once and might again specifically benefitted them.

      I’m sure you are smart enough to perceive these distinctions, EP. Which makes me wonder what your true point is when you bring your nihilistic equivalencies to a place like this. Because if you think you’re going to persuade the rest of us to adopt your perspective, well…even you should know that’s impossible.

    • Peterr says:

      It was Bush 41 that pardoned the Iran-Contra folks, thus assuring that he himself would also avoid any accountability, all done with the able assistance of then-AG Bill Barr — yes, the same Bill Barr who returned to help Trump with his own accountability avoidance measures.

      • Ginevra diBenci says:

        Yep. Some things never go out of style. Your comment, Peterr, supplies one example (among many) to rebut the argument, made mostly by Republicans, that Trump is the sole cause of Trumpism.

  14. gmokegmoke says:

    From the very beginning of his first term, I’ve understood that Trmp was systematically destroying the counter-intelligence capabilities of the USAmerican government. It continues, with a vengeance (literally), as he begins his second term.

  15. wa_rickf says:

    h/t Rayne: “corruption vs golfing”
    ——-
    EO: Gulf of America

    How embarrassing. The whole world is laughing at us. Only a small d-energy old man would even come-up with such an asinine thought, let alone say it out loud.

    • P J Evans says:

      Or someone with the mind of a small child.
      (It makes me wonder how much money his father donated to truant officers and school officials, since TFG seems to have learned nothing since about the age of 7.)

Comments are closed.