Republicans Get to Chew on Matt Gaetz for Two Months and a Week

Since Jack Smith conveyed that he was going to shut down, I’ve been pondering how to improve Democratic messaging enough such that when Smith issues his report, it would make clear to Republicans, especially Mitch McConnell (and now John Thune, his chosen successor who was chosen today), they would own Trump’s crimes going forward. Similarly, I’ve been trying to anticipate how to convey the sheer outrage of the pardons Trump will issue when he becomes President.

I didn’t and don’t have great expectations that Democrats will be up to the task.

But then, after appointing a Fox TV pundit to run the largest military in the world, Trump picked Tulsi Gabbard to run the biggest intelligence operation, and then picked Matt Gaetz to run DOJ.

Thus far I’ve heard just a few Republicans (Lindsey Graham, Tommy Tuberville, Anna Paulina Luna), in either chamber, suggest Gaetz should be confirmed. Everyone else, especially Senators, are saying, welp, let’s have a thorough confirmation process. Some are nodding towards the clearance process they still imagine Trump would adhere to. Elsewhere, Ed Whelan is spreading rumors that Trump simply intends to recess Congress and appoint his cabinet that way.

It’s a frenzy. And it’s a frenzy led by Republicans — though Democrats are definitely joining the fun. A frenzy that has already led to a flood of new details about Gaetz’ debauchery.

If Gaetz gets this job via some means, it’ll be horrible. But it would probably be less horrible than if Mark Paoletta got the job, because Paoletta is highly competent, bureaucratically and legally, and personally close to Clarence Thomas and Sammy Alito. If you’re going to have a guy trying to thoroughly weaponize DOJ, I’d much rather have the guy who’ll piss off judges and natural Trump allies in the process.

Now, maybe this will burn through quickly and Trump will replace Gaetz with Paoletta. But if not, Gaetz serves as a ready symbol whom most Republicans loathe of all the same fitness problems that Trump has, of the same reasons why rule of law matters.

Trump is sprinting to bring the US down — and his nominations, and the means he might take to install his nominees, make that more clear.

Yes. It’s horrible. Everything is horrible. But this Gaetz nomination (along with the other two) may finally convince people that Trump really is the menace to America that Democrats and never-Trumpers have been warning he was. There may be no better person than Gaetz to convince the Republicans who hate him how poor Trump’s judgment is.

Update: After reporting that the Ethics Committee was going to vote on Friday to release their report on Gaetz (which is one of two reasons he quit), Dick Durbin called on the committee to preserve and share the report. John Cornyn also said he’d like to review it.

image_print
208 replies
  1. Ithaqua0 says:

    Frankly, I think Tulsi Gabbard as DNI is worse; she’s a cultist (for real), and given that plus her friendliness with Russia, Syria, …., I’d think it would be impossible for her to get any significant security clearance if it weren’t for the fact that Trump can make it so. See https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tulsi-gabbard-cult-putin-democrat-science-of-identity-b2556594.html from a couple of years ago for more details. Gaetz can only ruin Federal law enforcement, not state law enforcement, but Gabbard will be able to give away the farm.

  2. grossman says:

    I believe that is wishful thinking. Yes, they’ll voice concern and whatever else, but remember how Senator Graham crumbled in weeks after Jan. 6th. Unfortunately, I expect the same.

  3. Yankee in TX says:

    Lovely! Someone with fewer morals than Trump for AG and someone less intelligent than him to be his DNI. Where can Patel land to do even more damage?

  4. Error Prone says:

    It has the appearance of Trump daring the Senate to balk with having somebody worse next man up. Tulsi and Noem, and Susie as chief of staff. Women of the kind he trusts are appointed, Tulsi being Samoan on one parent side, so not all white men.

    It could all be worse. I do not see Susie nor Tulsi as coup leaders. Hegseth, yeah, maybe. It ain’t over. More to be named. Rubio was a surprise.

    Is there any sign he is using a transition team, or is this all Trump alone, perhaps Don Jr making up names?

    • scroogemcduck says:

      “It has the appearance of Trump daring the Senate to balk.”

      This. Gaetz withdraws, and all of a sudden Devin Nunes, John Eastman or Jonathan Turley looks like the “reasonable” option.

  5. paulka123 says:

    Women’s reproductive rights are now in the hands of an adjudicated rapist and a man credibly accused of raping a child.

    • KittyRehn says:

      That sounds like the move of someone who (among other factors) feels extremely confident that he’s getting (and keeping) that cabinet position.

      I hope it bites him in the ass.

      • scroogemcduck says:

        Or, someone who was leaving Congress anyway and knows he will be just fine wherever he ends up in MAGA-land, OAN-land or Fox News land.

    • Peterr says:

      Per Maya Miller at the NYT, the investigation may end, but a report is still possible:

      Gaetz’s resignation ends the House Ethics Committee’s investigation of allegations including that he engaged in sexual misconduct, illicit drug use and other charges. But the committee, which had been investigating since 2021, could still release its findings.

      For a report to be issued, the ethics committee has to be angry enough at Gaetz’ conduct at issue, pissed off enough at his arrogance and general behavior (see “McCarthy, Kevin, end of the speakership of”), and not in fear of any retribution from Trump or his minions. I think it is very likely he first two conditions can be met, but the third one is the one up in the air.

      Ethics Committee Members:

      Republicans
      Chairman Michael Guest, Mississippi
      David P. Joyce, Ohio
      John H. Rutherford, Florida
      Andrew R. Garbarino, New York
      Michelle Fischbach, Minnesota

      Democrats
      Ranking Member Susan Wild, Pennsylvania
      Veronica Escobar, Texas
      Mark DeSaulnier, California
      Deborah K. Ross, North Carolina
      Glenn F. Ivey, Maryland

      • emptywheel says:

        Someone on Bluesky noted that a Dem could use parliamentary privilege to read the report into the record.

        • Peterr says:

          John Cornyn (!) appears anxious to see what the House Ethics Committee has uncovered. From The Guardian:

          Senior Republican senator joins calls for sharing of Gaetz ethics report

          John Cornyn, a long-serving Republican senator from Texas who came in second in yesterday’s election to lead his conference, also wants to see the House ethics committee report into Matt Gaetz, Reuters reports:

          Cornyn told reporters “there should not be any limitation” on the Senate’s investigation as lawmakers consider whether they should confirm Gaetz to head the Justice Department, “including whatever the House Ethics Committee has generated.”

          When asked if that means he wants to see the ethics report, he replied: “Absolutely.”

          The report investigating allegations of sexual misconduct and drug use by Gaetz was reportedly days away from being released, before the congressman resigned his seat yesterday after Trump nominated for the post of attorney general. It is now unclear if it will ever be made public.

          Cornyn is the second senator today to call for the document to be shared with the chamber, which is tasked with confirming a president’s cabinet appointments. Dick Durbin, the Democratic chair of the judiciary committee, made a similar demand minutes ago.

          Internal links omitted.

  6. CaptainCondorcet says:

    By this point the picks are so strange that I am left wondering whether he has a “real” list hidden away after the outrage blows over. He has plenty of sycophants after all. Like some weird version of price-anchoring, and we’re all supposed to get wowed by the “discount” of the next people. Unless he fears competence this time around, even in positions that would actually benefit him. If so, he’s almost frighteningly on-point.

    • Peterr says:

      Or . . .

      Trump is trying to force GOP Senators to declare their loyalty to Trump by confirming these wildly unsuitable appointments (Hegseth, Gabbert, and Gaetz), before getting to the outrageous policy positions he is going to bring to Congress. If there are Republicans who are intent on bucking his agenda, he wants to know now so that he can beat and beat and beat on them between now and Jan 20.

      • CaptainCondorcet says:

        hmm, i agree that rooting out “disloyal” senators would be worth having an inefficient department head if you can slide in a useful deputy secretary at a later date. And admittedly with some of these picks he doesn’t even have to go looking for skeletons in the closet to use as leverage, and that doesn’t even include any leverage he can gain by pitting them against each other as an added layer of insulation. NSA confirming details of Gaetz indiscretions as the FBI keeps a team on potentially compromising business connections from Gabbard? The sky’s the limits for the man who hosted a survival-style TV show…

        • bgThenNow says:

          Do you think He thinks Gaetz ran the ethics committee off on the kind of charges He was convicted of, and Gaetz can get the fines thrown out? I know it is two different courts. But WTF?

          Maybe the Senators are tired of this game show. It is weird.

        • oldoilfieldhand says:

          “NSA confirming details of Gaetz indiscretions ” is an example of sanewashing that gives the Gray Lady a run for her money. Unless of course this blatant misuse of the English language is attributable to that same geriatric information relic.

        • SotekPrime says:

          I think Trump doesn’t even believe in “competence” or, honestly, objective reality. I think he really just believes in loyalty and disloyalty – if someone fails at the task he assigned them, that means they’re not fully loyal, not that the task was too hard or impossible.

          And his first term, he learned that the people everyone says are “competent” told him “no” a lot, so, to him, they were disloyal – so this time he’s going all-in on people who tell him “yes” a lot.

        • KittyRehn says:

          I’m with Sotek here, I don’t think ‘competency’ (at least as we understand it) is a factor in Trump’s decisions here. The through line of weakening the capacities of the administrative state has been mentioned a few other times in the comments, but I also think Trump’s reality TV background is showing through.

          Creating the problem to sell you the solution is nothing new, and a bloated, ineffective bureaucracy (or the appearance of one) lets him sell “small government” alternatives to his base. Such a move also goes hand in hand with the appointment of Musk and the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

    • Bill Crowder says:

      Trump’s power to rule the legislature, especially the Senate, is diminished by the day. He is old, tired, in poor health (sure, just as crazy venal as ever), but he will be gone within the next 2 years. At least as a power. He may be drooling in some corner, but his minions will only be using him as a prop, not obeying him.

      Trump was the magnet. His minions? Not so much.

      At least my ouija board tells me this.

    • HorsewomaninPA says:

      Trump can be counted on to always have the element of surprise and his words and actions are so bizarre sometimes that they have a way of focusing our attention on him (even when we want to think of anything else but…)
      I’ll offer this as a possibility – he has got some pretty heinous things in mind and he will need 100% committed people to carry them out. Putting those people who are unqualified but diabolical in jobs where they get to exact their own revenge for their own purposes makes them more likely to do whatever he wants them to do when the time comes. I do this for you so you will do that for me. That is how Trump ensnares people.

  7. MsJennyMD says:

    Senator Heinrich (D-NM) response to Gaetz nomination on Blue Sky:
    People voted for cheaper eggs, not whatever the f@#(= this is.

  8. omphaloscepsis says:

    From 5 years ago in Mother Jones:

    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/07/how-matt-gaetz-used-daddys-money-to-become-trumps-favorite-congressman/

    “The meanest member of Congress hails from a town called Niceville . . . ”

    “Gaetz is a third-generation politician. His grandfather, Jerry Gaetz, was the mayor of a small town in North Dakota and a state legislator who died in 1964 at the state GOP convention after giving a speech endorsing Barry Goldwater for president. Matt’s father, Don Gaetz, has been a prominent figure in Panhandle politics since first winning election to the Okaloosa County school board in 1994.”

    “In the late 1970s, his father co-founded a nonprofit hospice company that successfully lobbied Congress to allow Medicare and Medicaid to cover its services. Once the public money started flowing, the nonprofit became a for-profit corporation, Vitas, that grew into the country’s largest hospice care provider.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VITAS_Healthcare

    • oldoilfieldhand says:

      We should all remember that a great deal of the Gaetz family influence is related to the Sr. Gaetz’s disbursement of the billions in fines that BP ponied up to bury the fact that their reckless attempts to “beat the odds”, by usng questionable techniques in deepwater drilling procedures, polluted the Gulf of Mexico for a thousand years.

  9. Cheez Whiz says:

    This is advance work for the Circus, teasers about the main characters next season. The entrail reading on all this is mostly staring into the abyss, but I really though Trump wanted a fixer, a Roy Cohn, an Avenging Angel. Does this sound like Matt Gaetz to anyone? It may be simply Trump was impressed with Matt’s rabid weasel audition, and he would arrest Congress at Trump’s command. Matt’s job will be to release the hounds, not go to court. There was little/no strategic appointments last time, and he thinks his problems were caused by a lack of loyalty, not competence.

    • Rayne says:

      What would it look like if Trump was told what to do by an authority figure whose respect and fluffier he wanted as narcissistic supply?

      Would it look like he got a fixer? Or would it look like absolute foolishness if the authority figure was someone like Putin?

      The nude photos of Melania may have been a threat to follow through with this kind of stupidity.

      • e.a.f. says:

        The picture of Melania Trump is some weird. At the old age of 75, don’t recall the leader of one country publishing a nude picture of the wife of another world leader. Now I may have forgotten if some one did, but its so unusual. A friend and I were discussing it this morning and they were shocked. Not by the picture but that one world leader would do that to another world leader. it is so weird. We both felt some one was sending a “message”.

        • DaveC2022 says:

          Agreed that the pics are anomalous (crazy?). Humans often see patterns & ascribe intentions that have more connections to the observer than the realities of the day. Nonetheless: What if Putin’s has the pee tape? How better to remind Trump of than nude photos of Melania? Ricocheting through the hall of mirrors, what if Putin’s doesn’t have the pee tape, but feels free to troll Trump with it anyway? Continuing on the roll, what if either scenario rattles Trump, and he is just randomly throwing out potential cabinet nominees because he’s more worried about personal exposure than anything else? I don’t put much faith in any of this speculation, It’s likely more navel gazing than useful, lots of insomnia these days

        • Molly Pitcher says:

          That wasn’t a ‘message’. That was a sharp, upward snatch of the choke chain, reminding Trump whose leash he is on.

  10. earlofhuntingdon says:

    Putin must be laughing his ass off. Trump isn’t even in office yet and he’s already bringing the house down.

    Donald Trump has endlessly demonstrated that his judgment is as bad as his ability to manage investments. Trump really wants these outrageous Cabinet picks. If nothing else, they advance his and Bannon’s project to bring down the government. Somehow, he’ll manage to create an information highway between himself and the Kremlin.

    Gaetz’s resignation is a big red flag, though, suggesting how serious the House investigation against him is. He knows his nomination is among the few that a GOP-controlled Senate might not approve. But he resigned his seat anyway. Curious and curiouser.

    • CaptainCondorcet says:

      I wonder if that was one of the conditions for the announcement. Resign now, greatly reduce the chance of a report being released. Still no guarantee he gets in, but he’d only get Trump’s support if he avoided becoming a spectacle. Only one of those allowed, at the top…

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      How kind of Donald Trump to give Matt Gaetz cover for what now seems to have been his prompt and inevitable resignation from the House. How absurd that he did it at the expense of the DoJ and the rule of law.

      • scroogemcduck says:

        I have no doubt that you are correct.

        Rick Scott and Matt Gaetz would have to be one of the worst ever pairs of Senators from any state.

      • RitaRita says:

        If he were to be appointed to Rubio’s seat, how would that affect the House Ethics Committee’s actions?

        • earlofhuntingdon says:

          Apples and oranges. The House Ethics Committee loses continuing jurisdiction, when a member leaves the House.

          Were DeSantis to appoint Gaetz as interim Senator, replacing Rubio until the next election required to permanently fill the seat under state statute, he would still be a former member of the House. It would not revive the House’s jurisdiction.

        • Peterr says:

          Replying to EoH:

          True, but the House Ethics Committee could refer the matter to their Senate counterpart, or the Senate could request it from the House.

          Gaetz may have done the most damage in the House, but he certainly pissed off a lot of GOP senators along the way.

      • Molly Pitcher says:

        He don’t need no stinking confirmation, there is always the recess appointment and he can be ‘acting’ AG till hell freezes over.

  11. Amateur Lawyer At Work says:

    Between Slotkin and Gaetz, how close is Speaker going to be? How many votes does Johnson have to spare before there isn’t a majority and/or a race for special elections?

    • Peterr says:

      Not Slotkin, but Stefanik. Slotkin is a Michigan Dem who went from the House to the Senate; Stafanik is a Republican in the House who is Trump’s nominee for US Ambassador.

      But to your basic question, if the House is full, it takes 218 votes to become speaker. For every two vacancies in the House (deaths, resignations, un-resolved elections), it takes one less vote.

  12. GinnyRED57 says:

    Meanwhile, what’s happening while we wait for the next ridiculous clown shoe to drop?

    Gaetz’ resignation from Congress may be a gift if the Senate manages to reject his nomination, but I expect Rump to force him through via a “recess” appointment.

  13. Matt Foley says:

    I screamed obscenities at the tv twice tonight.

    1. Trump’s excuse for being a total asshole to Biden: “Politics is tough.”

    2. Dave McCormick’s response to mandatory recount: “Waste of taxpayer money that won’t change the results.”

  14. e.a. foster says:

    There doesn’t appear to be any reason or game plan for these nominees. From the incompetent to the weird. toilet sales person? The portfolios require skills and intelligence. These people seem to be lacking those. Last time there were people with skills in the Cabinet, even if people questioned their decisions, their motives, etc. the current crop and just so out there thought he might have had a stroke while making the announcements. Of course with his cabinet during his first term, they knew enough about the system to object to some of his plans and could have mounted a challenge. This bunch, they truly are going to have a problem finding the light or the bathroom. Perhaps some one ought to bring a toilet.

    • emptywheel says:

      I think that’s wrong.

      First, there’s a throughline of Christian nationalists, in Huckabee and Hegseth, especially.

      Between Hegseth and Gaetz I suspect there’s a vision to turn the military into a personalized force defending Trump, not the Constitution.

      • Silcominc says:

        I could be wrong but it seems to me that the military and justice will be repurposed toward domestic unrest and the rest will be closed down. It is the end of the federal government.

        [Moderator’s note: I am unable to confirm you have published comments here in the past because your username “Silcominc” is nearly same but not identical to “silcominc” (letter case matters); email addresses do not match, nor does the IP address used for this comment match. Comments made as “Silcominc” and/or using the email address used on this comment will be added to the Watch list. Reminder: we don’t require a valid/working email, only that community members use the same email address each time they comment.

        If you are the same community member “silcominc,” please reply to this comment using the established email address to be removed from the watch list. /~Rayne]

        • silcominc says:

          Sorry Rayne – did not realize its case sensitive and I did it on my phone which auto capitalizes first letter.

          [Moderator’s note: this does not explain the difference in email addresses though the IP address on this comment helps cement your identity. We don’t require a valid/working email address, only that you use the same one each time you comment. If you are going to permanently switch email addresses, please be patient as your comments will trigger auto-moderation until the system “recognizes” you by this new address. /~Rayne]

      • Stephen Calhoun says:

        The whole ‘shall I uphold my oath at the cost of my job?’ is going to be the canary in the coal mine. In the military context these types of decisions will determine whether or not the constitutional order will be preserved or grievously misshapen. Will their be a heroic pushback?

        The implicit evolution of the GOP at the moment is toward squaring the circle: authoritarian yet not needing the Constitution to be replaced.

        imo

      • Frank Anon says:

        Wholeheartedly agree. The throughline is crystal clear to me, and that is creating a frontline of cabinet-level fools to take the heat they probably can’t fully internalize for those behind the scenes dictating through, or of Trump, their mandates. RFK looks like a clown when he monopolizes the discourse banning flouride while the Fifth Circuit quietly lets every remaining abortion guardrail fall

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      Another through-line is that Trump’s nominees are largely bent on destroying the traditional work of their agencies. Reagan and both Bushes provide precedents. Gaetz is the most extreme example, so far, although he’s neck-and-neck with Gabbard.

      Sometimes, that’s to stop an agency’s work altogether, as Betsy DeVos wanted to do at the Education Dept., work Trump has promised to complete this time around. Sometimes, it’s to create an unfiltered conduit of data to the White House, bypassing agency analysis. Dick Cheney did that with a narrow portion of the CIA’s work about his wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

      Trump also seems to want to keep decision-making inside the White House. Weak, incompetent Cabinet members are more likely to shove things up the chain of command than do it themselves and risk Trump’s ire. Again, Cheney did that to a degree, when he installed political commissars in key departments. Trump is taking it to its logical conclusion when he puts the commissars in direct control. Kash Patel would be an example of that.

      • bgThenNow says:

        Agencies should be taking some of the load off the WH instead of shoving the work to the top. Perhaps this will be the Achilles heel of the next few years. He is lazy and incompetent, but petulant for sure. How will Wiles and Miller manage? The WH staff will be overwhelmed. More hires? Triage employees to the hallways like in hospitals?

        It does not look promising, no matter what.

      • Peterr says:

        I thought Gorsuch at EPA and Watt at Interior during the Reagan administration would be a duo that would be hard to top.

        Trump appears to have done exactly that in the span of about 48 hours, and he’s got a bunch of major positions yet to fill. Enrique Tarrio as head of the Bureau of Prisons? Don Jr. as Secretary of the Treasury?

    • Greg Hunter says:

      Due to the terrible local news options, I began watching TMZ this year and as I watched, it became evident they were slanting toward Trump even as they had a wider group of different guests that they interviewed than other shows. I had worried about our side ignoring this medium and now I am convinced it is a place where AOC or Pete or someone needs to be.

      Yesterday they brought on General Russel Honore to talk to him about the Pete Hegseth nomination and it was interesting to hear his reaction. What was not shown in the link I provided is how TMZ used Pete Buttigieg’s “Inexperience” to justify picking Hegseth after the Honore interview. I cannot find that part of the show which I find interesting as well.

      There is a far more organized and orchestrated sales job going on and we have very little way to track it and respond to it.

      Honore was funny but he thinks the Senate will do their job….I am not convinced…

      https://www.tmz.com/2024/11/13/army-general-russel-honore-says-pete-hegseth-wrong-about-women-combat/

      • earlofhuntingdon says:

        Sec’y Pete at least had management experience. And the size and scope of his work as Sec’y of Transportation doesn’t hold a candle to the job of SecDef.

        Hegseth has no management experience. He’s an angry, radical right performance artist who makes millions playing the clown. His combat experience as a junior officer, while laudable, is not relevant to the job of SecDef.

        Ignoring the plethora of black box and black budget ops it ultimately controls, the Pentagon’s budget is $800-900 billion a year. It’s the largest and most complex institution on the planet. Hegseth would be a blind man in a maze.

        • Mike from Delaware says:

          “… the Pentagon’s budget is $800-900 billion a year.”

          Trump is about to graduate from petty grifting and ascend to full blown oligarch once he access to that kind of money.

        • earlofhuntingdon says:

          Billions of dollars in costs that would normally be accounted for in the Pentagon’s budget have been distributed to other agencies, but are of fundamental importance to the Pentagon’s operations.

          The VA exists, for example, to provide health care to its former employees. It has a separate $300 billion budget.

          The Dept of Energy originally played a considerable role in managing the nuclear industry, whose principal role was development of nuclear weapons, not just domesticate energy production. Its budget is about $50 billion.

          The Pentagon is the principal customer for US intel agencies. There are a plethora of them, beyond the usual suspects of the CIA and the NSA. Their budgets are both opaque and separate, though some, such as the DIA, are included in the Pentagon’s budget.

          The point is that the SecDef’s duties are beyond what many people consider his responsibilities and profoundly beyond the reach of Pete Hegseth.

        • Molly Pitcher says:

          As an aside, I think Secty Pete has been brilliant at messaging what he has been doing. The rest of the Dems could learn a thing or two from him.

          He is seen reaching out to every corner of the country and when he appears on interview shows, always manages to tie the transportation project to lifting up the local community or the jobs sector or all of the downstream beneficiaries.

        • Peterr says:

          As I’ve heard clips of Hegseth interviews and statements, he strikes me as a major who has spent many hours with other captains and majors bitching about the idiocy of colonels and generals, based on the limited knowledge and unlimited egos of the captains and majors involved.

          Meanwhile, colonels and generals know which captains and majors understand what they don’t understand, and those captains and majors who don’t. My sense is that Hegseth falls into the latter category.

    • ApacheTrout says:

      The gameplan is to bend agencies to favor certain donors, or make the them incompetent, as this amplifies the Republican message that there is no such thing as good governance. The former is much more preferable, as it’s lucrative. For example, they claim to want to eliminate the Department of Education. I suspect they’ll find that it’s more beneficial/profitable to restructure it to favor block grants to states that in turn will send the money to privately owned schools, while at the same time creating unachievable standards for public schools.

    • Rayne says:

      We don’t form governments in the U.S.; if none of his nominees are approved by the Senate, the existing non-appointees continue to carry out the function of their department/agency.

      The questions now: whether there are enough anti-Trump Senators to form a majority coalition to shoot down all inappropriate nominations, whether the same faction is committed to holding the Senate open on a pro forma basis to prevent recess nominations, and most importantly, is the new Senate Majority Leader with the anti-Trump faction such that he doesn’t make changes to the Senate’s rules.

      • Memory hole says:

        “The questions now: whether there are enough anti-Trump Senators to form a majority coalition to shoot down all inappropriate nominations,”.
        I think something needs to be added to this question. Are there enough Senators willing to face the threats of violence to themselves and their families.
        It seems the line of goppers who ever say no to Trump is the same length as those who say they receive threats to themselves and their families.

        Not all of them can afford the extra security like Mitt Romney. So most remain silent and the threats of fascist violence go far under reported.

        • Cicero101 says:

          This violence, a key aspect of fascism, which goes back as far and further as Jeff Flake, has been woefully underestimated and underreported.

        • earlofhuntingdon says:

          That’s more true of House members. Nearly every Senator is a multi-millionaire. Sherrod Brown is one of the few who aren’t. We lose him in six weeks. His Republican successor appears to be a hundred millionaire.

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      So, Epshteyn and Gaetz pulled a fast one on Susie Wiles, when they were on Trump’s plane but she was not? They persuaded Trump to pull Gaetz’s balls out of the House Ethics Committee fire he threw them in? (Imagine how bad the report must be if Mikey Johnson’s House contemplated taking action against Bully Gaetz.)

      I’m beginning to wonder if Wiles will stay on Trump’s team even as far as next Jan. 20th.

      • harpie says:

        According to the source [“a Trump official”],
        Wiles WAS on the plane…just in an adjacent room.

        I’ve been wondering lately about where in the world Roger STONE is.
        [ ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” Mike FLYNN “]
        [ ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” Eric PRINCE “]

        The report is evidently pretty bad.

        • earlofhuntingdon says:

          That makes more sense. But it would be worse for Wiles, were she not on board with Gaetz’s nomination.

          There are usually many reasons for these things, some contradictory. With Trump, there’s always the possibility that he wants the sideshow to distract attention from the adjacent circus tent that’s on fire.

    • Savage Librarian says:

      Last night I almost made a comment suggesting that Epshteyn probably had a hand in this decision. And I wondered what Wiles was thinking and doing. So much for controlling the clown car. Go along to get along is likely to be the new motto.

    • SteveBev says:

      @Harpie

      Trump Force1 en route to dare,
      AG choosing happened where?
      While the Trump plane in the air!
      Gaetz and Epshteyn were the pair,
      When Susie Wiles was not there.

    • Matt___B says:

      The Deciding happened on the plane
      goaded on by Boris EPSHTEYN
      while Susie WILES was not there
      ——————————————-
      Selecting Gaetz without a care

      • harpie says:

        Marcy:

        […] Boris’ role in Trump’s apparent plan to destroy the country has gotten little notice amid the parlor games focused on when the two narcissists, Elon and Trump, will tear each other down. But his apparent role in this decision bears more notice. […]

  15. RitaRita says:

    Trump’s appointments are motivated, first and foremost, by a desire to surround himself with loyalists, who will do his bidding without pushback.

    If confirmed, one of Gaetz’s first tasks will be to find any records of sexual malfeasance by Trump, his family or friends and make sure those records are forever expunged. Who better to expunge records than Gaetz?

    We are going from late stage Roman Republic direct to Caligula.

  16. Zirczirc says:

    While I agree that there is a throughline, I don’t think Trump gives a damn about “Christian” nationalism. And while I credit him with guile and a visceral, animal cunning, I don’t see him as particularly intelligent. So who is putting these names in front of him? Wiles? Miller? Musk? Thiel? It all seems to be lunacy, but someone has an agenda. As for the Senate, Thune presumably thinks power comes with the position of Majority Leader. If he doesn’t oppose the craziest of these nominations at the very least, he won’t have any. He’ll just be an American version of Medvedev. And, yes, our armed services will become a Praetorian Guard.

    Zirc

    • Namaste_MF says:

      If we are gaming strategy, I would think you appoint the extremists first to push through the destruction/ dismantling of the current system.

      I don’t think Trump especially cares about anything beyond himself at all, so all these appointments make perfect sense as designed to protect and benefit him. They also make sense for those, like Elon, with longer range plans that require our current system to fail.

      The plan seems to be to go to a technocracy/ Oligarchy. Recessions transfer wealth upwards, and Elon is planning a recession/ depression. I believe they will also push for a break up of the country into separate provinces/ fiefdoms. The argument will be that we are too large for government to work. Secessionist movements will be promoted on the right and left. The more fucked up the current government is, the more power these movements will have, and the more people will desire a ‘strong leader’.

      [Welcome back to emptywheel. SECOND REQUEST: Please use the SAME USERNAME and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment as “Lostinmesa” which is your third username to date; it has been edited this one time to match your established username “Namaste_MF.” Future mismatches of username may not clear for publication; check your browser’s cache and autofill. /~Rayne]

  17. xyxyxyxy says:

    I received email from the Harris campaign concluding “Can we count on you to contribute $10, or whatever feels right to you, to support the Harris Fight Fund program to make sure we hold Trump and Gaetz accountable and prevent them from undermining our rights?”
    What can they do at this point that they want my more money?

      • Rayne says:

        And because the amount paid for InfoWars is part of the settlement owed to Sandy Hook families, most of the funds will go back to the families.

        Whoever thought this up is a genius.

    • harpie says:

      DEAL MAY NOT GO THROUGH

      https://bsky.app/profile/lizdye.bsky.social/post/3lawsidp26c22
      November 14, 2024 at 4:27 PM

      Holy shit … listening to this hearing, I think this Infowars sale to The Onion may not go through. It’s certainly not going through right away.

      WHOA! Okay, we will have a whole podcast on what just happened in bankruptcy court with the Infowars/Onion deal in the morning. Going to record now. […]

      • harpie says:

        https://bsky.app/profile/andrewtorrez.bsky.social/post/3lawshqcgsc22
        [I break down the law so you don’t have to. Practicing lawyer and
        cohost of the Law and Chaos podcast with @lizdye.bsky.social]
        November 14, 2024 at 4:26 PM

        Bottom line: for now, that Murray will continue to run FSS, which is to say that InfoWars WILL STAY SHUT DOWN at least until Alex Jones’s lawyers file a motion for a TRO sometime early next week.

        https://bsky.app/profile/andrewtorrez.bsky.social/post/3lawtij5yy222
        November 14, 2024 at 4:45 PM

        We will break down all of these questions on tomorrow’s show, but the answer is that it’s complicated as to why the Onion won despite putting up less cash.

        When you stop to analyze it, it makes complete and total BUSINESS sense, but it’s not intuitive.

      • harpie says:

        https://bsky.app/profile/andrewtorrez.bsky.social/post/3lawc2tww5c2y
        November 14, 2024 at 11:33 AM

        1/ FUAC, [First United American Companies] whom we suspect to be the vehicle to turn InfoWars back over to Alex Jones & was the runner-up bidder to the Onion, has filed an emergency “Request for Status Conference” to protest the sale of InfoWars’s assets. […]

        As someone who has argued collateral issues in bankruptcy court, I can tell you bankruptcy judges are uniformly small-c conservative in / temperament & VERY loath to do anything that looks like awarding equitable relief. That’s made things hard on the Sandy Hook plaintiffs so far but IMO will work in their favor now.

        I think it is unlikely Judge Lopez will hold the hearing or disturb the Trustee’s determination. We’ll see.

        FUAC sounds like an acronym devised by Roger STONE and/or Steve BANNON.

      • harpie says:

        BWAHAHAHA! Called it!

        https://bsky.app/profile/ronfilipkowski.bsky.social/post/3laxan5fdfc2r
        November 14, 2024 at 8:40 PM

        Roger Stone says it is “a tragedy” and “not fair” that he was outbid by The Onion in his attempt to buy InfoWars in the bankruptcy auction to keep it going, and wants Matt Gaetz to investigate what happened as soon as he takes office as AG. [VIDEO]

        STONE on X@AJNLIVE, unknown time:

        Right, this wasn’t a fair proceeding. Unfortunately, the bankruptcy trustee has geared hims has guaranteed himself major litigation for the lifesman career. He’s going to be sued because he acted corruptedly.

        In fact, once Matt GAETZ is attorney general, I think he should examine this entire proceeding, because there’s there’s epic corruption.

        You know, we did put together a very good bid. Now I think Alex may have no choice but to bid on MSNBC to buy that. Perhaps that could be repurposed. It’s for sale, and they’re they’re making no money. Ah i..i..this is a tragedy

      • harpie says:

        Alex Jones Is Trying to Halt the Sale of Infowars. Elon Musk’s X Just Got Involved in the Case At an emergency hearing this week, lawyers for the social media company appeared. They haven’t explained why. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/11/alex-jones-infowars-sale-onion-elon-musk-x/ Anna Merlan 11/16/24

        THREAD from Ben Collins [Tim Onion]:

        https://bsky.app/profile/bencollins.bsky.social/post/3lb3hecp7l22k
        November 16, 2024 at 12:51 PM

        Hi friends!
        I just wanted to give a quick update on The Onion’s purchase of InfoWars, which we can’t wait to relaunch as the dumbest website on the internet.

        The long and short of it: We won the auction and — you’re not going to believe this — the previous InfoWars folks aren’t taking it well. [THREAD]

    • harpie says:

      Two more about The Onion purchase of Alex JONES’ Infowars:

      1] No, Elon Musk Isn’t Riding To Alex Jones’s Rescue He’s evil, but come on. https://www.lawandchaospod.com/p/no-elon-musk-isnt-riding-to-alex
      Andrew Torrez and Liz Dye Nov 18, 2024

      2] https://bsky.app/profile/andrewtorrez.bsky.social/post/3lbafrcjnzk2f
      November 18, 2024 at 12:06 PM

      BREAKING
      1/ Two hours after FUAC (the likely Alex Jones front group) filed its motion to disqualify the Onion’s winning bid to purchase InfoWars, chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee Christopher Murray has filed
      a preliminary response in the strongest possible terms,
      threatening to seek sanctions. [screenshot] [THREAD]

      • harpie says:

        2/ As we mentioned earlier, the FUAC brief is wildly intemperate in its language — and it is particularly rich for a group that Alex Jones himself has implied he’s working with but has NOT disclosed that fact to the court — to accuse a trustee of “collusion.” [THREAD continues]

        LOL!

        • harpie says:

          And one new addition to the latest news:

          https://bsky.app/profile/andrewtorrez.bsky.social/post/3lbajlch2dc26
          November 18, 2024 at 1:14 PM

          1/ One last amazing bit on the sale of InfoWars to the Onion.

          One of the things we learned from reviewing their bid is that the Onion has also promised a share of future revenues derived from InfoWars not just to the CT plaintiffs (their joint bidders) but the TX plaintiffs as well! That means… 2/ another way this bridged the gap between everyone Alex Jones hurt. [screenshot]

          The Onion didn’t HAVE to do this. They chose to do it. And they chose to do it privately & they’re STILL not bragging about it.

          It’s the kind of thing that helps restore faith in the law
          at a time when we desperately need it.

  18. ExpatR&RDino-sour says:

    Stepping into the black void ahead, is this a step toward dissolving congress in the future? Create a bunch of outrageous conflict that even some Republicans won’t go along with so Trump can say how corrupt the entire federal government has become and that only he can do what needs to be done to “save” America, so he must rule by fiat? I’m only writing partly in jest.

    It’s becoming a very bad movie.

    [Welcome back to emptywheel. Please use the SAME USERNAME and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment as “WottsamottaU” triggering auto-moderation; it has been edited to reflect your established username. Please check your browser’s cache and autofill; future comments may not publish if username does not match. Changing usernames without notifying moderation is sockpuppeting and not permitted. /~Rayne]

  19. Fancy Chicken says:

    I’m a sexual assault survivor and I’ve had to seriously curtail my news consumption since the election because Trump is a huge trigger for PTSD related, paralyzing panic attacks. (Dealt with this the last time.)

    I’ve been doing pretty, good staying on a fairly even keel until yesterday when I heard the announcement about Gaetz on NPR coming home from the grocery. I had to pull off on the side of the road I was bawling so hard.

    I mentioned in the comments on Hegseth that he was Trump material having had an affair with a Fox executive producer during his first marriage resulting in a child. Mostly just more ick manosphere types.

    But psychologically, Gaetz is just a whole ‘nuther story. If I find it suffocating and panic inducing that my president is a rapey misogynist, the thought of Gaetz running the DOJ is just so much more trauma on top of Trump as Gaetz feels uncomfortably closer overseeing law enforcement that can impact so many of our lives- Comstock anyone?

    I was hoping that Trump’s courting of the manosphere was just for votes, but the horror is he’s turning over critical positions to other misogynists and abusers which fortunately he didn’t overtly do last time.

    I really have to believe that there is some grains of sensibility left in the GOP and the Senate will not stoop to installing Gaetz to oversee our country’s law enforcement. I’d be eating Ativan like candy and not sleeping at all.

    • MsJennyMD says:

      Thank you for speaking up and speaking out. Good for you allowing yourself to express your feelings releasing the past. I too am a survivor of sexual assault. I too get triggered as do many with a personal history of sexual abuse. It is appalling a man who is adjudicated for sexual assault is now president elect. Disturbing people voted for him knowing his history of assault. Plus congressional colleagues continue to excuse and reward abusive behavior.

      For 9 years, it’s been challenging. However, I too am speaking up and speaking out. A family member asked ask me why I didn’t vote for him I replied, “I refuse to reward abusive behavior. I refuse to be abused.” Then walked away. Satisfaction!

      Take care of yourself. Be gentle with yourself. Reach out to others if you need help. Allow yourself to move through the discomfort. And breathe.

      • IdaLewis says:

        Ladies — many thanks for speaking out. I support you. We all must defend ourselves in this political climate. I salute your courage.

    • bgThenNow says:

      Take care, Fancy Chicken. I too am a survivor, not as easily triggered, and I hope you have support from people who love you and are close by.

      These things are very hard. Thank you for speaking out. It gets easier as you use your voice more.

    • Matt Foley says:

      I’m a man and not a sexual assault victim but I am furious on behalf of you and all victims. Please know that I and most men are not like these MAGA bullies who feel entitled to grab and take whatever the hell they want.

    • Just Some Guy says:

      I am also a survivor of sexual assault, during my childhood. I admire your courage in writing and posting your comment. Thank you. Please know that you are not alone.

      • Fancy Chicken says:

        Hey thanks ya’ll.

        It feels comforting to know I’m not alone or weak that some of this really triggers me.

        As always, you’re the best comments section online.

        • SteveBev says:

          Definitely not weak.

          Naming what is the true source of your anger and anxiety, owning your responses as being justified, recognising what you need to do to take care of yourself, and requesting respect for all of those things is strength not weakness.

          The sooner the ignorant recognise that lame comments though ostensibly targeting a predator as the butt of humour, merely contribute to a culture of bantering permission, which serves to validate predatory creepy behaviour as edgy rather than vile, the better the world will be.

    • -mamake- says:

      @ Fancy Chicken – I had two gang of boys attempted assaults in elementary years – in two entirely different states. I started to think there was an invisible target on my back…then drug raped at 20 and as a result found trauma resolution work, built up a ton of resources and grew into working in the field for years.
      I got stuck in intense rage since the election which was for me a cover for intense terror. The perpetrators (mostly men) that are in the world around us, have kept a pretense of functionality at work and in public institutions, but now the hoods are off and they are in power. It is terrifying.
      I am only just now finding my way back to some semblance of self-care and sanity, however iffy.
      I read here most days and it is clarifying and more helpful than I can say. Grateful for Marcy, Rayne, Peterr, Ed, Nicole, and all the regular deep and wise contributors here.
      My annual donation is coming soon, wish it could be more but am planning for reductions in benefits soon.

      • -mamake- says:

        Rayne, just noticed my comment has been in moderation for a day or thereabouts.
        Not important – can leave it there or delete. Sorry for hassle.

        [Moderator’s note: I don’t see any comment from you in Pending, Spam, or Trash moved there by auto-moderation, sorry. /~Rayne]

  20. globalguy says:

    And the new Department of Justice experience program will get your middle school daughter the opportunity to work alongside the Attorney General!

    • Rayne says:

      Rape of minors is not funny. Rape isn’t funny, period.

      Consider the possibility members of this comment community and readers may include sexual assault survivors.

      You’re already on thin ice here given your history of sockpuppeting (8 names so far).

    • Just Some Guy says:

      In comedy, timing is everything.

      Which is why I cannot fathom how someone could read the comment above the one I’m replying to then think to themselves, “lemme make a joke about statutory rape.”

      Jesus H. Christ, y’all.

      • Valley girl says:

        TY JSG- I started college at 16. I was the subject of a lot of “statutory rape” jokes. I can say that it was horrible then, and despite what mr asshole sock puppet might think, it isn’t funny now. It’s just plain abusive.

  21. JanAnderson says:

    Hope I’m wrong, but I believe the Media All Sorts and Republicans will have it (the sycophants cabinet) all normalized by January.

  22. greengiant says:

    What are other players like Leonard Leo up to with his alleged Maine meet up last week with people flying in in private jets? I doubt there is any daylight between them and the self called Christians who helped make homosexuality a capital offense in Uganda.

    • Epicurus says:

      Leo bought a mansion in Northeast Harbor, I believe, in 2109. If people are flying in, it is just to kiss his ring and plan for what Leo wants to do over the next four years. It is easier and more private for him to have everyone fly in and meet at his discretion than to have to go meet at some other place He recently bought a church near his house there. People like to name their cottages and such up in that neck of the woods so I would imagine he named his mansion Chateauneuf de la Nouveau Pape.

  23. Frank Probst says:

    Can anyone name 4 Republican Senators who are willing to oppose any of Trump’s nominees, no matter how ridiculous they are? Lisa Murkowski, maybe. Anyone else?

  24. timbozone says:

    Can we play “Foreign Asset Roulette” now?

    This definitely looks like a conspiracy to discredit the Congress itself.

  25. xyxyxyxy says:

    Trying to counter Marcy’s next post, per cnn, Trump picks Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to be his secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.

    • SteveBev says:

      And in a totally normal way of things, the announcement was made first by the first son of the president elect.

    • P J Evans says:

      I can’t see the health care and health insurance companies backing him. Diseases (especially those that require lots of treatment/ICUs/kill people slowly) are expensive.

  26. Matt Foley says:

    Trump says RFK Jr. will keep us protected from “harmful chemicals, pollutants, pesticides, pharmaceutical products, and food additives…”

    I’m SURE it was an honest mistake that he omitted viruses.

  27. Nessnessess says:

    I hope not too OT, re: Trump’s staffing and appointments, and their function both as trolling mechanisms and rounding out the cast members of Trump II.

    Kari Lake, having lost her senate bid, is available to be comms director and/or head spox. She’s of the same trolling caliber as some of his other choices.

    • xyxyxyxy says:

      Huckabee in the first admin wouldn’t do any briefings when things started getting testy.
      But Lake seems to really be out there so I don’t think they can hold her back if things get testy.

      • Peterr says:

        Trump won’t make her a spox or comms director. If anything, he’d name her Secretary of the Interior, and they wouldn’t dream of holding her back.

        Trump: “Your job is to demolish everything Deb Haaland has accomplished over the last four years. Indian stuff, woke climate change stuff, oil industry regulations, all of it. I want it gone.”

        Lake: “Yes sir. Absolutely sir. Right away sir.”

  28. harpie says:

    Elizabeth Warren denounces Biden administration over Gaza humanitarian situation Massachusetts senator now joins Bernie Sanders in endorsing joint resolution of disapproval against Joe Biden https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/14/elizabeth-warren-biden-gaza David Smith Thu 14 Nov 2024 14.24 EST

    […] She added: “The failure by the Biden administration to follow US law and to suspend arms shipments is a grave mistake that undermines American credibility worldwide. If this administration will not act, Congress must step up to enforce US law and hold the Netanyahu government accountable through a joint resolution of disapproval.” […]

  29. harpie says:

    Remember John Sauer? He’s Trump’s nominee for Soliciter General

    Marcy wrote about him here:

    John Sauer Says Joe Biden May Assassinate His Client
    https://www.emptywheel.net/2024/01/09/john-sauer-says-joe-biden-may-assassinate-his-client/ January 9, 2024

    […] [John Sauer wants a world in which] Joe Biden could order Seal Team Six to assassinate Donald Trump, then quit immediately, before Congress could impeach him, and there would be absolutely no way to hold him accountable for killing his opponent. […]

  30. Molly Pitcher says:

    Given whom he has nominated thus far, I am going to go out on a limb and say that the Secretary of the Treasury will be the little man in the top hat from the Monopoly game.

      • Just Some Guy says:

        Scrooge McDuck.

        I’ve been making not-very-good jokes that the next chair of the Federal Maritime Commission will be either the “I’m the Captain Now” Somali pirate guy or… Wait for it…

        Cap’n Crunch.

    • NerdyCanuck says:

      Rich Uncle Pennybags!

      (who later became “Mr. Monopoly”)

      Who was modeled after the original J.P.Morgan, apparently.

      Seems too old school rich and classic to be someone Trump + Co. would go for though, me thinks… he likes the new, young, brash crazies…

  31. Eric Johnson says:

    The only appointment Trump has made that resembles a glitch of reality imo is Rubio. Hegseth is the guy who said he doesn’t fear what he can’t see. Does he fear the wrath of his “God”, or does the site of a depiction of the almighty do the trick? Putin is celebrating the Gabbard appointment. Huckabee doesn’t believe Palestinians exist and he’s the ambassador to Isreal. RFK Jr…. sorry not sorry. That’s bat shit crazy. Are recess appointments possible cuz I believe they can stay 2 years. That’s too damn long. I’m beyond concerned

    [Welcome to emptywheel. Please use the same username and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You published this comment from an IP address range shared by another username and email address; future comments attempted from that range will be subject to auto-moderation. /~Rayne]

    • SteveBev says:

      I note the terms of the denial
      “Hegseth has vigorously denied any and all accusations, and no charges were filed”

      ‘Any and all’ suggests to me that that there is an unspecified concern about more than the specific details of this particular incident.

  32. biff murphy says:

    “Chew on Matt Gaetz”

    The old speaker of the house will be rubbing all their noses in it unless tfg placates him with some sort of job for his troubles.

  33. biff murphy says:

    McCarthy is already making the rounds on cable news against Gaetz.
    I got a feeling tfg will offer him a job to button his lip.

Comments are closed.