Whatever Happens with the Debate, Kamala Harris’ Campaign Is Not Yet Half Done

As you watch the torrent of news obsessing about the debate tonight, remember this stat:

Trump’s campaign is 92% done (665 of 721 days).

Kamala Harris’ campaign is not quite half done (48%, or 51 of 107 days).

Lots can and likely will still happen in this race, but Trump is almost done and the Vice President is only halfway there.

The debate coverage is almost entirely focused on what Kamala Harris can do with it (though Peter Baker finally wrote a story — one published above the fold in the dead tree version — that Trump might look old). Polls show that almost a third of voters will look to the debate to learn more about what Harris stands for — which likely is code for “feels.” But pundits are focused on whether Harris can define her policy agenda, or whether Trump can succeed in branding her with policy failures on immigration, inflation, and the Afghan withdrawal.

There has been far less focus — or just as often, outright misunderstanding — on Harris’ efforts to make a Trump meltdown more likely. I’ve argued that was one purpose of Brian Fallon’s very public effort to get ABC to allow live mics. Even though the effort failed, it sets up a focus on the worries from Trump’s own handlers that he’ll lose his cool.

And yesterday and today, Harris has taken steps to make that more likely. Today, she released an ad based on President Obama’s mockery of Trump’s obsession with [cough] crowd sizes.

 

I’m not a fan of the ad. The glimpse of Trump’s very small hand is over the top.

I’m also not the audience for this ad.

Trump is.

Seeing a Black former President mocking his masculinity is the kind of thing that Trump is often unable to shake without a lot of babysitting.

I’m more fond of yesterday’s ad, which makes a far more substantial point: That none of the “best people” who used to work for Trump support him this time.

 

It, too, is designed to get under Trump’s skin. Anything involving Mark Milley gets under Trump’s skin! And Harris released it with enough lead time that ABC might even ask Trump about the ad, one of those stupid questions about the campaign that horserace journalists can’t resist. Perhaps the ad will lead ABC to ask a far more substantive question about why Trump is the first former president in history whose former VP refuses to back him.

So Harris is doing what she can to raise the chances that a man with no impulse control will act like a whiny baby in front of the whole country today. He’ll probably avoid saying the N-word (though I don’t rule it out). But there’s a decent chance he’ll say or do something that will display his insecurities about facing a very smart Black woman for all the world to see.

My point about the timing, though, is that the most likely outcome is that this won’t matter. The most likely outcome of tonight’s debate is that whatever happens, pundits will review the debate and decide, 60-40, that one of these candidates won the debate. Focus groups will tell pollsters, 40-60, that the other candidate won the debate.

If that’s the outcome, if Kamala can’t immediately win over a chunk of new supporters, if Trump can’t brand the Vice President as a communist, then it is unlikely to significantly affect the race.

Tomorrow morning, we’re most likely to be where we are today: with a tie race, only with 55 days left instead of 56. Trump will still be 92% done and Harris will be 49% done.

The reason I keep harping on that timing, though, is that most campaign journalists are not accounting for the fact that Harris did in the last 51 days what Trump did (or was supposed to do, but the Guardian reports he has not) in the last twenty months: lay a foundation for the rest of the campaign: Set up offices, recruit volunteers, identify likely voters, prepare a voter persuasion and mobilization plan.

While pundits were focused on crowd sizes, Harris used those huge rallies for a very specific purpose: to very quickly recruit a ton of volunteers who would find and turn out every possible vote. Tim and Gwen Walz and Doug Emhoff are swooping into campaign offices and randomly getting on phone calls that volunteers are already placing to identify and persuade voters, something that wows the voters, but also inspires volunteers that their efforts are not isolated from the larger whole.

But Harris has done something else in the last 51 days that has largely been measured only in terms of enthusiasm, if at all. She has:

  • Provided a permission structure (most recently with the Liz and Dick Cheney endorsements) for Republicans to support her
  • Elevated reproductive rights from one of many issues to the most important issue for many voters
  • Gotten a whole lot of younger voters of color, especially women, to register to vote

All three of those things are a foundation. Only the first one — a permission structure via which self-identified Republicans first consider and then, maybe, vote for Harris — will play a very important role tonight. If she succeeds in presenting herself as the better national security candidate (which should be child’s play) and if she succeeds in allaying concerns about her liberal record, it may advance that permission structure, little by little. Even that won’t immediately show up in the polls.

But the rest of that foundation — the new voters, the newly central reproductive rights as campaign issue — may not show up in polls at all. It’s not even clear which pollsters are using up-to-date registration lists to do their polling. It’s definitely unclear what the likely voter model will look like.

No one knows.

No one knows, in part, because Kamala Harris is only halfway through her campaign.

It’s certainly possible that one or the other campaign will do something that dramatically alters the shape of this race tonight. Though for all the bluster about Trump’s gish galloping debate prowess, if he looks old or melts down, the flood of lies may not be enough, this time.

But if that doesn’t happen — if neither candidate manages to disrupt the tied race with their debate performance — than that other detail becomes important again.

Donald Trump is more than nine-tenths of the way through this race.

Kamala Harris still has half the race to build on the foundation she has laid in the last 51 days.

image_print
72 replies
  1. Edie Ellis says:

    GOTV doesn’t show up in polls but Ds are far, far ahead of Rs in the ground game. That is a key reason the red wave never happened in 2022

    • Rugger_9 says:

      If one believes the pundit rumblings, the RNC has essentially become a conduit to pay the various legal bills while also pulling back from several states including battlegrounds. The focus appears to be a rope-a-dope play to muck up the election enough to throw the election to the House. Between the election officers who will have ‘doubts’ about the vote counts and ‘voter fraud’ to justify refusing to certify the results, and the various suppression tactics (like Paxton’s raid on LULAC in TX) the GOP hope is that Harris won’t reach 270 EC votes which will trigger the House intervention.

      The House votes by state, with each state having one vote regardless of the size of the delegation. The Senate votes for VP in that scenario, which in theory could lead to Walz becoming VP (25th Amendment, anyone?).

      We saw a taste of this policy in the 2020 election transition, especially with the GSA head Emily Murphy refusing to acknowledge Biden’s win and therefore preventing Biden’s team from access (and no doubt allowing more shredding time).

    • massappeal says:

      Agreed. At least from everything I’ve read, Democrats have a far better GOTV operation in most, if not all, the swing states.

      Of course, GOTV only matters at the margins, typically 1-3% for one side or the other. (Good thing for Trump that none of the swing states appear to be close*.)

      *sarcasm

  2. Barry Schwartz says:

    It’s not really Gish galloping prowess, I think. It is tangential speech and is a symptom of unwellness.

    [Welcome back to emptywheel. SECOND REQUEST: Please use the SAME USERNAME and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment as “BARRY B SCHWARTZ” which triggered auto-moderation; letter case, spacing, and middle initials matter. I have edited your name this one time to match your established username. Please make a note of it and check your browser’s cache and auto-fill. /~Rayne]

  3. rosalind says:

    had a long call with a good friend who finally broke her NYTimes addiction a few years back but is still susceptible to the blaring headlines. had to talk her down from “but Kamala didn’t get any post-convention bounce!” and “the polls!”, emphasizing she can’t look at this election through any “normal” lens. directed her attention to the new voter registrations and engagement. room for optimism, but still too freakin’ close.

    • Twaspawarednot says:

      All indications are that Harris is attracting young voters. Young voters are less likely to respond to polls. Harris may be farther ahead than what is apparent. I am not young but I have never responded to a poll. They are annoying.

      • Tech Support says:

        I saw someone comment to the effect of, “Show me someone under the age of 40 who EVER answers a call from an unknown number. I’ll wait.”

        • ExRacerX says:

          I’ve been receiving a lot of polls via text.

          Not that I’m answering those, either, but phone calls aren’t the only vector for polling.

  4. Bears7485 says:

    My hope is that Harris can land enough body blows that Trump won’t be able to resist showing his true self and utter some racist/sexist/bigoted shit, either on a hot mic or not.

    The people who are, inexplicably, still on the fence may be swayed by an overt show of Trump’s true character.

    • P-villain says:

      Why would tonight be any different than the last nine years? My plan us to leave the TV off, put on some good music, and join my spouse writing postcards to voters in a swing state. I think it’s a good plan.

      • originalK says:

        The cynical me does think that the debate, and the political coverage in general, is a mechanism for distracting and demoralizing dems. Reps serving up this narcissism-dementia stew for a, well, half my child’s life. And the first third was us recovering from the Bush recession!

        I’ve been seeing vote-related t-shirts in my area, and may do some online shopping. I did loving-kindness meditations almost every day in the first weeks of July.

    • Tech Support says:

      I think the more likely thing to happen, and possibly the more impactful thing, is that he goes on some rambling rant that leads to the latest version of “injecting bleach” or similar obvious nonsense.

      Or conversely to say something that’s not necessarily offensive to Kamala personally but clearly offensive to a large segment of the electorate.

      • P-villain says:

        After nine years and countless outrages, it’s fruitless to imagine that somehow, this time, Trump will alienate his supporters with some gaffe or insult. Instead of waiting for that epiphany, focus on concrete measures aimed at getting Harris’ supporters in the swing states to vote.

  5. Savage Librarian says:

    In the Meantime

    Proud of Harris in the meantime
    Proud of Harris, such a pol
    Proud of Harris
    She’s a winner
    And she’s civil
    Proud of Harris,
    She’s a stunner
    She won’t shrivel

    Proud of Harris, she’s so cogent
    She’s so cogent, she’s so clear
    Proud of Harris
    Why, oh why, so proud of Harris
    Fearless, she perseveres

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caExf8y_GVE

    “I Love Paris – Paul Mauriat”

  6. John Paul Jones says:

    I don’t know (of course!) but I have a bad feeling that Trump will try to paint Harris as changing her policy positions by talking about how she “recently became black.” I think he thinks it makes the point quicker for his key audience. I think it’s especially likely if one of the presenters lobs a question about flip-lfopping on issues at the two of them. So I’m thinking the debate may turn into a mess.

    • Anhedonia says:

      She won’t, but she could go low: Ask why the press hasn’t asked when and why Trump decided to turn orange. Is he ashamed of his pasty whiteness? Why orange instead of, say, blackface? Is there some amount or shade of skin color that becomes excessive?

      • massappeal says:

        She might! FWIW (i.e., nothing, really) my guess is that if Harris engages on this point, she’s more likely to jab and pivot.

        So, if the moderators or Trump brings it up, she’d say (with a sense of humor) something like: “In 20 years of televised debates, I think this is the first time my opponent has worn more makeup.”

        Then pivot: “But the American people don’t care about how much makeup we’re wearing; they care about what we’ll do if elected….”

      • rbba_06MAR2020_1251h says:

        Too much about trump’s proclivities, words, golfing is left unexplored. His behavior pre, during and post presidency is made know by the media and book writers..some excited comments.. then nothing. The potus is serious business and the candidates and occupants should be held to an extreme level of scrutiny. The most consequential years in the world’s history and foolishness takes the headlines.

        [Welcome back to emptywheel. FOURTH AND FINAL REQUEST: THIRD REQUEST: Please choose and use a unique username with a minimum of 8 letters. We have adopted this minimum standard to support community security. Because your username is far too short it will be temporarily changed to match the date/time of your first known comment until you have a new compliant username. Thanks. /~Rayne]

        • -mamake- says:

          Would love to see her drop a few facts regarding costs to taxpayers of all of his golf days and ‘executive hours’ and meetings at properties he owns, secret service et al….

          Just drop it like a shiv and move on. Let his head explode….stand clear of the bronze debris.

  7. Error Prone says:

    My bet is Trump will do enough to have the media saying,”Still a horserace,” and regular citizen – individuals to see one side or the other “winner.” Early backstretch, far still from the finish line, neck and neck will be the pundit analysis.

    My bet is also record number of viewers.

  8. Amicus12 says:

    I think one significant issue Is whether he will glitch – will he lapse into paraphasia. He has been doing so repeatedly in his campaign rallies, but it seems to be largely ignored by the Usual Suspects. What happens if he does so tonight? It is one thing to cover up his word/thought salads, it is quite another to pretend away the inability to pronounce common words and lapse into incoherent garble.

    • Rwood0808 says:

      Agree.

      I would not be surprised if Harris has been coached on how to both induce a glitch and respond to one.

      Of course, it could also be as simple as “Was there a complete thought or sentence in that response?” and from there just keep poking the bear until he self-destructs.

      That may change a few minds but I think most have already made up theirs months ago. It’s down to turnout and countering whatever vote challenges trump and his ilk throw up. Georgia will likely be the first place we see that.

      I’d like to see Harris make a visit to Floriduh after the debate. Its in play.

      • P-villain says:

        In related news, the Missouri Supreme Court has reversed Judge Limbaugh (yes, that family) and ordered Sec of State Jay Ashcroft to put that state’s pro-choice initiative onto the November ballot. Not saying that puts MO’s electoral votes in play, but it will help women and Democrats greatly in the Show Me State.

      • Stephen Calhoun says:

        Turnout and slivers of undecided voters in the so-called swing states. There are also huge numbers of registered but unlikely voters in all age groups.

        Polling reflects assumptions about turnout models. If 18-29 year old women in the swing states voted at 60% turnout, what would the Harris vote, then, look like? 60% would be a boffo turnout.

        Were all 18-29 year olds to vote at 55% turn out in the swing states, what would the Harris vote be? Did the polling models in 2020 capture the increase from 39% to 50% in turnout of young voters?

        Here’s a map via Tufts of 18-29 turnout by state in 2020. (Tufts Circle also states that 41 Million Members of Gen Z Will Be Eligible to Vote in 2024.)

        https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/half-youth-voted-2020-11-point-increase-2016

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      Kamala Harris would not need to be coached in how to induce a glitch or respond to one. She’s a litigator, a prosecutor, and an experienced politician. That sort of wordplay becomes second nature, or you change your line of work.

    • Molly Pitcher says:

      I fully expect the disgraced Dr Ronnie to have provided Trump with enough stimulants to have a couple more than the usual synapses firing tonight.

  9. CovariantTensor says:

    Dick and Liz Cheney are big permission. Nobody would mistake either one for a liberal. It would be nice if, in addition to Edgar Bergen, Charlie McCarthy himself came forward and endorsed Harris. “Where is George?”, as the refrain went. It would also be nice if more Republicans came to the point where we can disagree on almost all of the issues but would still rather have someone honest and competent in the Oval Office than a know-nothing dictator wannabe.

  10. GSSH-FullyReduced says:

    Confidence rules in any debate. Donthecon has decades of experience acting confident in front of a friendly audience. TeamHarris needs to find a nugget of kryptonite that will weaken the act and expose his insecurities. Mining through the decades of narcissistic offal in search of that nugget takes time…Unless an AI-assisted placer cannon finds it quickly and TeamHarris mounts it in Kamala’s pendant tonight.

    • -mamake- says:

      Whatever Putin said to him in Helsinki – a symbol of that compramot that he clearly recognizes but is not obvious to anyone else.
      Or an image from Epsteins file. Or E. Jean Carroll sitting next to Melania , holding hands – and M’s bodyguard boyfriend next to her. No ring on M’s finger.
      Mary Trump would know of the most humiliating moment from his childhood and identify a representation of that. Whatever, Kamala will prevail.

      • VinnieGambone says:

        Trump sealed the deal (at least with the blue collar, low educate voters ) with one vicious line
        “Oh yes Jen, you’re a real tough Guy.”
        Hoping Harris has sharpened a similar shieve

  11. Guitarsophist says:

    In 1984, Big Brother is not a real person. He is just a Stalinesque face on giant posters and a slew of slogans. I don’t think that the money and people behind Trump care if he glitches or meanders or insults. The reality of Trump doesn’t matter anymore. They want the idea of Trump. Or, to be more hopeful, perhaps the reality of Trump still matters in this brief moment because the false narrative hasn’t yet taken hold completely. In that case, the debate might make a difference.

  12. TanMan_10SEP2024_1142h says:

    You can’t rely on the polls, ever. The polls rely on calls to talk to people. Here are the problems with that approach:

    1. Working people don’t answer polls. So the polls already don’t include all the workers.
    2. Only “true believers” answer polls – only they are more than willing to state their preferences. Normal people don’t answer polls.
    3. My final point – people LIE. They answer polls like they WANT to sound, not how they actually think.

    Polls are, therefore, useless.

    [Welcome to emptywheel. Please choose and use a unique username with a minimum of 8 letters. We have adopted this minimum standard to support community security. Because your username is too short it will be temporarily changed to match the date/time of your first known comment until you have a new compliant username. Thanks. /~Rayne]

  13. Robot-seventeen says:

    I look back at the time when Democrats didn’t take a messaging advantage with Trump when he proposed surrendering to the Taliban at Camp David (which sent Bolton into a tizzy IIRC) and hope that doesn’t come back to bite them. The Afghanistan withdrawal seems to be sticking a bit and we’ll probably be hearing about it tonight.

    It was a golden opportunity at the time IMO but has been left on the table ever since. I still don’t understand why they can’t put it in those terms. It’s easy to understand.

    • harpie says:

      On Mastodon, Rayne reposted something about that from the Harris campaign:

      https://masto.ai/@lovelylovely/113099885137781374
      Sep 07, 2024, 23:48

      The Harris Campaign. On the Anniversary of Trump inviting the Taliban to Camp David just days before the anniversary of the September 11 attacks on America.
      [screenshot of Harris campaign statement]

      Harris campaign:

      Five years ago today, President Donald Trump revealed in a series of tweets that he had invited the Taliban to Camp David just days before the anniversary of the September 11 attacks. […]

      • Robot-seventeen says:

        Well she brought it up and did well but I really wish they’d characterize the enitre episode for what it was. A surrender. Not a negotiation or agreement or whatever but a surrender. Trump humiliated the nation and really didn’t pay a price politically because they failed to take advantage of it.

        In the debate Trump talked about how Biden left weapons and equipment behind and she could have pointed out they weren’t in a position to disarm the Afghan government and their soldiers to fend for themselves after Trump surrendered. I may be nitpicking. She did well on the subject.

    • harpie says:

      Here’s TRUMP’s Xeet that day:

      6:51 PM · Sep 7, 2019 https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1170469618177236992

      Unbeknownst to almost everyone, the major Taliban leaders and, separately, the President of Afghanistan, were going to secretly meet with me at Camp David on Sunday [9/8/19]. They were coming to the United States tonight. Unfortunately, in order to build false leverage, they admitted to an attack in Kabul that killed one of our great great soldiers, and 11 other people. I immediately cancelled the meeting and called off peace negotiations. What kind of people would kill so many in order to seemingly strengthen their bargaining position? They didn’t, they only made it worse! If they cannot agree to a ceasefire during these very important peace talks, and would even kill 12 innocent people, then they probably don’t have the power to negotiate a meaningful agreement anyway. How many more decades are they willing to fight?

      • harpie says:

        1:49 PM · Sep 9, 2019
        https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1171118506089361409

        A lot of Fake News is being reported that I overruled the VP and various advisers on a potential Camp David meeting with the Taliban. This Story is False! I always think it is good to meet and talk, but in this case I decided not to. The Dishonest Media likes to create the look of turmoil in the White House, of which there is none. I view much of the media as simply an arm of the Democrat Party. They are corrupt, and they are extremely upset at how well our Country is doing under MY Leadership, including the Economy, where there is NO Recession, much to the regret of the LameStream Media! They are working overtime to help the Democrats win in 2020, but that will NEVER HAPPEN, Americans are too smart!

        1:56 PM · Sep 9, 2019
        https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1171120177196544000

        We have been serving as policemen in Afghanistan, and that was not meant to be the job of our Great Soldiers, the finest on earth. Over the last four days, we have been hitting our Enemy harder than at any time in the last ten years!

        9/10/19 TRUMP’s National Security Advisor, John BOLTON, resigns

        BOLTON is one of the TRUMP officials in the second VIDEO.

    • Pick2OrPass says:

      During the debate tonight I almost spit out my tea when he casually referred to the Taliban leader (he negotiated with there) by first name- I have no idea if he’s even right but I think it was surprising to VP Harris as well. Stunning.

  14. Matt Foley says:

    I also like the second ad better but the music makes it feel like a movie trailer.

    Trump ads talk about pro life and safety. Harris needs to call him a hypocrite and make Trump own the 1.1 million covid deaths. Because of Trump’s recklessness (let in covid, encouraged antivaxers, held superspreader rallies that required signing covid waiver to attend) we had more covid deaths than our 5 deadliest wars. He likes to say “more died of covid under Biden” but that’s because Trump encouraged “freedom over health and safety” by encouraging antivaxers to ignore Biden’s constant pro-vaccine messaging. Finishing line: “Trump thinks 1.1 million covid deaths is freedom and health and safety. I and most Americans have more common sense.”

  15. earlofhuntingdon says:

    I hope Kamala Harris remembers her penchant for recruiting people and builds on it. The last few Democratic administrations have put too little effort into staffing and building farm teams to prepare for the next administration.

    The junior and mid-level staffers they hire go on to become players in Congress, staffers on the Hill, and senior judicial and political appointees. If you want a bigger boat, you have to build it.

    • Badger Robert says:

      The first day in office President Harris could make a job offer to a prominent 30 something TV journalist that works for CNN, order security clearance check on Kinzinger, advise Goeff Duncan to apply for a job in the Energy Department, and promote Buttigieg to a permanent career path in diplomacy. And other things along those lines.

  16. Error Prone says:

    Harris has to listen. Trump will say something outlandish. Harris has to spot it and make something of it. She has to stay loose, and not look over-coached. If Trump does not, stay on topic when asked a question. She’ll do okay.

  17. punaise says:

    Digby cites these questions (via the Philadelphia Inquirer) that should be asked of Trump.

    Shortened list:

    1. Egypt / $10m
    2. Reproductive rights flip-flopping
    3. Threats against political enemies
    4. Scuttling the border bill for political advantage
    5, Undermining Gaza cease-fire
    6. Affiliation with Project 2025
    7. How can Harris be “radical: with these Rs endorsing her?
    etc.

    • Matt___B says:

      Mehdi Hasan’s wish list for questions to be asked tonight:

      https://zeteo.com/p/mehdi-debate-questions-for-trump-harris

      1. Explain plans to deport millions of immigrants
      2. Explain previous statements about “terminating” the Constitution
      3. With civil judgments rendered, and criminal judgments pending, why
      are you qualified to run for President?
      4. Do you have an actual childcare policy? If so, what is it?
      5. You are now the oldest person ever to run for president. Why
      shouldn’t you step aside like Joe Biden did?
      6. Have you ever apologized to the families of the Jan. 6 police officers
      who were killed?
      7. Explain what the acronym NATO stands for…

  18. Zirczirc says:

    Harris halfway done: Meaning that she just started. My daughter is a field organizer for Harris in NC. Started last month. Working her b*tt off just as she has for many other campaigns over the years from state legislature races to US senate. The trouble is it’s gig work. So she jumps from job to job with, at times, lots of space in between. Part of that down time is on her, but it would be nice if the DNC and state parties had money and inclination to have offices open with paid staff all the time. I believe that that was what Howard Dean was aiming for before Obama replaced him with Kaine (my daughter actually worked on one of his senate campaigns later). Kaine is ok, but I think he was the wrong guy for the DNC position. I have never been impressed with Jaime Harrison at the DNC either, but your mileage may vary. I just don’t see that consistent, overarching, nationwide organization building out of him. At the very least Dems need to work all 435 congressional districts all the time, and preferably drill down to the state legislative races. Yes, it takes money, but it could be doable.

  19. Badger Robert says:

    Ms. Wheeler suggests that if the real world data contradicts the poll data, the real world date is more persuasive.

  20. Veritas Sequitur says:

    The so-called debate is interesting since it is another opportunity to hear from the next President of the United States Kamala Harris. Her opponent did not debate in any true sense of the word during the most recent so-called debate between presidential candidates. He wasted viewers’ time with his lies, and he was dismally dull as usual.

Comments are closed.