Michael Sherwin Failed to Brief Merrick Garland on Trump’s Suspected Egyptian Payment

WaPo significantly advances the story of the suspected $10 million Egyptian payment to Trump — including the role of China in it.

The investigation started when the CIA got a tip from a reliable informant that Egypt had paid Trump the money.

In early 2017, Justice Department officials were briefed on initial reports from the Central Intelligence Agency that Sisi had sought to send money to Trump.

The intelligence had come partly from a confidential informant who had previously provided useful information, according to people familiar with the matter.

That led to Mueller’s focus on Trump’s decision to inject the same amount into his campaign after meeting with Abdel Fattah El-Sisi in September 2016.

Trump repeatedly declined — until Oct. 28, roughly five weeks after the meeting with Sisi, when he announced the $10 million infusion.

As described, Mueller focused on Trump’s finances in 2016, but prohibited investigators from looking at his finances after he became President. Instead, they subpoenaed the Egyptian National Bank, which led to the extended legal fight. Materials finally provided by the bank showed a transfer from Shanghai…

The Research and Studies Center opened an account at the bank’s Heliopolis branch in November 2015, the bank’s records showed. In August 2016, the center opened a second account, this time in the bank’s Shanghai branch. Five days after that, a company that investigators believed was tied to an Egyptian oligarch initiated a transfer of $10 million into the center’s Shanghai account, records showed.

The transfer was held up, then cleared for deposit in Shanghai in December, the records showed. The same amount was transferred from that account to the center’s account at the Heliopolis branch shortly before the cash withdrawal there on Jan. 15, 2017.

Three days later, the center closed its account in Shanghai. Within 90 days, its account in Heliopolis was closed, too.

… And following that, a request from a likely Egyptian intelligence front to withdraw the same sum in cash.

A short handwritten letter dated Jan. 15, 2017, in which an organization called the Research and Studies Center asked that the bank “kindly withdraw a sum of US $9,998,000” from its Heliopolis branch, located about seven miles from Cairo International Airport. According to the bank records, employees assembled the money that same day, entirely in U.S. $100 bills, put it in two large bags and kept it in the bank manager’s office until two men associated with the account and two others came and took away the cash.

In summer 2019, after being spun under DC USAO, the FBI was asking for permission to subpoena records from Trump’s 2017 finances. But then Jessie Liu met with Bill Barr, reviewed the underlying CIA intelligence herself, and grew hesitant about further investigative steps.

Sometime after her June meetings with the FBI, Liu met with Barr to discuss the Egypt case. He urged her to personally review the underlying information from the CIA that had prompted the opening of the criminal investigation two years earlier, according to people with knowledge of the discussions.

[snip]

Sometime around September 2019, FBI agents and a supervisor from the field office presented what they considered an ultimatum to Liu: authorize getting Trump’s 2017 bank records or it wasn’t worth continuing to investigate, according to people later briefed on the exchange. Liu listened but turned them down; she said she wasn’t closing the case and was open to subpoenaing Trump’s records later on if agents turned up more compelling evidence to justify doing so, these people said.

After Barr replaced Liu with first Tim Shea and then Michael Sherwin, Sherwin shut down the investigation on June 7, 2020.

Sherwin, the only person quoted in the piece, taunted that Merrick Garland could have reopened the case.

In an interview with The Post, Sherwin said Biden administration appointees, including Attorney General Merrick Garland, who took over the department months later, could have relaunched the probe if they disagreed. “The case was closed without prejudice,” he said. “Anyone could have reopened the case the second I left that office.”

The case was not reopened.

Except, as the last paragraph of the story describes, partly amid the rush of cases in the wake of January 6, Garland and his top aides were never briefed on the case in their first year in office — which for Garland, who wasn’t sworn in until March 11, 2021, would be March 2022.

Garland, senior members of his team, and Biden’s new U.S. attorney in D.C. were never briefed on the Egypt investigation in their first year in office, one former and one current government official told The Post.

The Statute of Limitations expired on January 15, 2022.

There’s still at least one hole in this story.

The money was deposited in Shanghai in August 2016. That’s before the September meeting between al-Sisi and Trump. Though at a time when Trump’s people — including both George Papadophoulos, who played a key role in setting up the meeting with al-Sisi, and Walid Phares, who was investigated for ties to Middle Eastern intelligence — were negotiating a meeting with Russia, in London, in September 2016.

Papadopoulos communicated with Clovis and Walid Phares, another member of the foreign policy advisory team, about an offthe-record meeting between the Campaign and Russian government officials or with Papadopoulos’s other Russia connections, Mifsud and Timofeev.480 Papadopoulos also interacted directly with Clovis and Phares in connection with the summit of the Transatlantic Parliamentary Group on Counterterrorism (TAG), a group for which Phares was co-secretary general.481 On July 16, 2016, Papadopoulos attended the TAG summit in Washington, D.C., where he sat next to Clovis (as reflected in the photograph below).482

Although Clovis claimed to have no recollection of attending the TAG summit,483 Papadopoulos remembered discussing Russia and a foreign policy trip with Clovis and Phares during the event.484 Papadopoulos’s recollection is consistent with emails sent before and after the TAG summit. The pre-summit messages included a July 11, 2016 email in which Phares suggested meeting Papadopoulos the day after the summit to chat, 485 and a July 12 message in the same chain in which Phares advised Papadopoulos that other summit attendees “are very nervous about Russia. So be aware.”486 Ten days after the summit, Papadopoulos sent an email to Mifsud listing Phares and Clovis as other “participants” in a potential meeting at the London Academy of Diplomacy.487

Finally, Papadopoulos’s recollection is also consistent with handwritten notes from a journal at that time.488

[snip]

These are the notes that Papadopoulos professed to be unable to read when meeting with Mueller’s investigators.

This story is also silent about Russia’s role in convincing Egypt to withdraw a UN resolution against Israel after Trump intervened in December 2016.

Finally, recall that Erik Prince and Kyrill Dmitriev met in the Seychelles on January 11 and 12.

image_print
47 replies
  1. OldTulsaDude says:

    Of all the norms liberal democracies depends on that were attacked by Trump and weakened, the one most in danger of total collapse is tolerance. This failure to update the incoming AG seems to me an example of total disdain for the legitimacy of the opposite side of the aisle.

    On a lighter note, would this Egyptian transfer be considered a “pyramid scheme”?

    • Bugboy321 says:

      It was more than disdain for the legitimacy of the opposition.

      There was *no* transition process in place, because Trump. Effective administrative transitions depend on the agency head to lead the effort. All prior presidents have grasped that principle, but Trump was AWOL, just like any other day of his administration.

        • xyxyxyxy says:

          Give the man a break, he was busy stealing government documents. He couldn’t multitask since he was only 73 or so years “young “.

      • CovariantTensor says:

        There was no transition between Trump and Biden, But Jeff Rosen was running the DOJ between when Barr resigned in Dec. 2020 until Garland took over in March 2021. So there should have been at least a partially orderly transition in the DOJ. Should Rosen take some of the blame?

        • Terry Watt says:

          Let’s not forget how they locked the front doors to the White House before President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden were to ceremoniously enter as the new residents.

          Trump and his gang are not only corrupt to the core but they’re all just as tacky as Trump. Don-old, so upset he didn’t win the Homecoming King crown.

          [Welcome back to emptywheel. SECOND REQUEST: Please use the SAME USERNAME and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment as “TLW” which doesn’t comply with the site’s minimum username standard; your first username does, however. I have edited it this one time match your established username; please make a note of it and check your browser’s cache and autofill. /~Rayne]

  2. I Never Lie and am Always Right says:

    Well, since they didn’t attempt to pawn anything, it wasn’t a pawnzi scheme.

    • CovariantTensor says:

      It says within Garland’s first year in office, which began in March 2021 when he was sworn in, to March 2022. Though I’m not sure what the significance of “first year in office” is since the statute of limitations had expired by then. Not having been briefed certainly precluded his reopening the case during the time he had.

      • Mumbles_05AUG2024_2257h says:

        The statute of limitations expired on the five-year anniversary of when the crime occurred. If the crime is bribery, the crime would have been committed when Trump completed his end of the deal, either by having Sisi to the White House or releasing the military aid. The last batch of the military aid was released in June 1018. So that would probably mean the statute expired on or around June 2023.

        It’s hard to know exactly when Garland got wind of the ongooing investigation.

        [Welcome to emptywheel. SECOND REQUEST: Please choose and use a unique username with a minimum of 8 letters. We have adopted this minimum standard to support community security. Because your username is too short it will be temporarily changed to match the date/time of your first known comment until you have a new compliant username. Thanks. /~Rayne]

  3. Clare Kelly says:

    Thank you for your diligence, analytical sapience, and persistence.

    Marcy wrote:
    “After Barr replaced Liu with first Tim Shea and then Michael Sherwin, Sherwin shut down the investigation on June 7, 2020.”

    Of a piece, imho, not only were post-election transition resources held up by Emily Murphy of the GSA, Biden was denied national security briefings he was eligible to receive, by law and custom, when his nomination was formalized in August of 2020, until November 24, 2020…during a time of international unrest and a global pandemic.

    • TS Elliot says:

      I hope Biden withholds security briefings from Trump. He’d just find a way to sell what he hears to the highest bidder.

        • Clare Kelly says:

          By tradition, not law, (I was incorrect), presidential nominees are eligible to receive security briefings.

          I have been wondering/anxious about this since the Republican convention, even though the briefings usually contain only a broad overview of threats and national security issues.

          I hope this was looked at in some table top exercise, prior to Trump’s nomination.

    • misnomer bjet says:

      Cannon’s dismissal of the ‘Mar-a-Lago’ case on the eve of nomination, gave Trump (et al) the best crack at a secret window into the ‘Mar-Lagos’ case possible, in that national security briefing, with the advantage of comparison to briefings at that point in 2016.

      Subsequent shifts in tactics or behavior in response to what may and may not have been seen through it, are perhaps confused and obscured by portrayal as reaction to Biden stepping down & Harris stepping up.

  4. earlofhuntingdon says:

    Sherwin: Merrick Garland could have cured my and Bill Barr’s obstruction and reopened the case. He chose not to. It’s on him.

    Very Trumpian argument.

      • Rayne says:

        Your comment went through so apparently it worked.

        Doctorow’s a nice guy who stimulates constructive discussion but he’s fallible. You know what’s coherent (by which I mean consistent) in Project 2025 across all its agenda items?

        White supremacy.

        Maybe because he’s part of the default he doesn’t see it. He toes up to it but he doesn’t see that every single agenda item is intended to deny anyone who isn’t cis-het Christian white any service a democratic government might provide to citizens.

  5. Fancy Chicken says:

    So I’ve spent the better part of the morning rereading everything that I have saved on this and I have a few questions.

    First, when the court released records in the end of June with the third party country redacted, it was discovered that this country was China and there was speculation about China’s role in this.

    Has the WAPO piece shown that with the Egyptian center set up in Shanghai, China was simply a part of the laundering efforts with their laws acting as roadblocks to getting documents for investigators and they did not play any larger role than this?

    Is the big question still what conversations happened with which Trump surrogates (with him in the loop always) to get Egypt to stand down on their proposed resolution to condemn Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and what were they offered to do so?

    In Bannon’s 301s he credits Kushner with the outreach to the Egyptians to set up the September meeting with Trump and Al-Sisi and at some point Kushner sends an email to Bannon and others stating that he wanted the campaign’s position to be that Egypt was the instigator rather that the Trump campaign of the meeting.

    Scattered throughout my reading this morning was Kushner, Kushner, Kushner; always near the margins but still in the know with nothing tying him directly to the Egyptian relationship. By the time I was ready to write this, it’s gelled in my mind that Kushner is waaaay more involved with this than is publicly known at this point.

    Now that this story has breached msm again I sure hope that investigative journalists keep following this as illustrative of what to expect in a second Trump administration god forbid, and to answer the questions still outstanding including what exactly was Kushner’s role and how did he benefit along with Trump.

    Thanks for alerting us to the WAPO piece and continuing to ask questions.

  6. Rayne says:

    A comment published at 3:05 p.m. ET 02-AUG-2024 has been moved to Trash as it proved little more than disruptive shit posting inappropriate for this site.

    Replies to that post are now hidden, sorry for the inconvenience.

    Let this be a reminder to community members to stay on topic with comments which do more to analyze and expand upon the post’s topic rather than dump emotional baggage here. Thank you for your cooperation.

  7. vigetnovus says:

    When did the informant’s tip come in? Was it before January 20,2017? Was it even before the fateful Jan 5th meeting with Strozk, DAG Yates, Susan Rice, Obama and Biden?

    Because I’ve long believed what got Flynn on Samantha Powers’ and subsequently the FBI’s radar wasn’t the Kislyak conversations, but really the Nov 2016 conversations with the Egyptians about the UN resolution. Could Flynn have been so careless as to mention material support to the Trump campaign during those dressing down sessions? And was Trump on any of those calls?

      • Grung_e_Gene says:

        ** comment hidden **

        These are trite dismissals of a huge problem but I expect nothing from the navel gazing ilk around here.

        [Welcome back to emptywheel. Please use the same username and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. DO NOT ADD A URL IN THE URL FIELD AS YOU DID NOT ADD A URL WITH YOUR FIRST COMMENT. You have done this twice today triggering auto-moderation; I have deleted the URLs. /~Rayne]

        • Rayne says:

          ** comment hidden **

          If you can’t comment without insulting commenters here, just leave. I don’t need the extra moderation work anyhow.

  8. Savage Librarian says:

    Two things:

    1. Remember that weird story Papadopoulos told about getting a $10K payment from someone in Israel in the summer of 2017. I wonder what that was really about.

    2. Michael Sherwin is a partner at Kobre & Kim. Coincidentally, that’s the law firm that was said to be paying Charles McGonigal in his Shestakov, Fokin, Deripaska connections. I’m not sure if that was an allegation or whether it was proven.

  9. Scott Rose says:

    It would be clarifying to have a video of the conversation where Barr supposedly “urged” Liu to “personally review” the underlying intelligence. What exactly did he say to her, and how did he say it? The existing report about the conversation — sourced from people “with knowledge” of it — is incomplete.

  10. Grung_e_Gene says:

    ** comment hidden **

    uh-huh, claiming I’m on drugs or mentally ill as both Willis Warren and earlofhuntingdon did isn’t to quote you “insulting commenters”? Is that it?

  11. P J Evans says:

    ** comment hidden **

    This isn’t the bird hellsite. Whatever you’re saying, it doesn’t sound as good on our screens as it does in your head.

  12. MissyDC21 says:

    What, if any charges can be brought? I’m so sick of Trump and his goons getting off.

    [Welcome back to emptywheel. Please use the same username and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment as “MissaDC”; you changed your username to meet the site’s standards on 22-FEB-2024. I have revised your username on this comment. Please make a note of it and check your browser’s cache and autofill. /~Rayne]

  13. CantankerousDave says:

    It blows my mind how thoroughly memory-holed it’s been that Barr had been A.G. before under Bush 1, and especially that he earned himself the nickname “Coverup-general Barr” from conservative columnist William Safire during his tenure for his role in torpedoing the Iran-Contra investigation before Caspar Weinberger’s diaries could show that Bush had lied to the FBI. It’s not hard to see why Trump hired him.

  14. Marinela says:

    So Trump finds out this story is going to break, and it decides to create a shiny story for the media to chase by saying atrocious lies at nabj.
    I wish we see more follow up stories on the Egypt connection, and Bill Bar involvement.

    I wish Rachel Scott had this info so she could ask him a question or two about what happened with the $10M and his connections with Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

    The immunity case that the supreme court ruled that Trump has at least presumptive immunity as president, is probably in place to cover for Trump as they knew some of the stuff he did when the subpoena for the Egypt bank was in front of them.

    The question is now why the supreme court needed to give Trump immunity, what do they know that is hidden from public yet?

    And as a good measure, the supremes wanted to have final saying so they can still decide on case by case bases what is criminal or not, and we know how they twist things based on D or R.

  15. Konny_2022 says:

    I find Will Bunch’s opinion on this scandal interesting: “Democracy dies if we drop the case of Trump, Egypt and $10 million in cash” (The Philadelphia Inquirer, Aug. 4, 2024, 12:13 p.m. ET). He particularly highlights Barr’s role in this:

    This is the third major case — in addition to the allegations of a Trump cover-up in Mueller’s probe of 2016 Russian election interference, and the 2016 hush money to Stormy Daniels that eventually led to Trump’s conviction on 34 state felony counts — in which Barr is alleged to have put his finger on the scales of justice in a case involving the president who appointed him. That alone is worthy of a congressional investigation.

    Do not let the matter of Trump, Egypt and the $10 million disappear. Although it’s tragic that the criminal statute of limitations expired, any alleged bribe can still be pursued as a civil case. More importantly, Congress — for now, that means the Democratic-controlled Senate — needs to open a full-blown investigation, with efforts to subpoena Barr and other Justice Department higher-ups to explain in public why the case was dropped.

    https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/commentary/trump-sisi-egypt-10-million-bribe-20240804.html

  16. P J Evans says:

    People still don’t know that Garland didn’t get briefed on this investigation – apparently EW is the only one who’s aware of that.

Comments are closed.