Boiled Frog Journalism: Is Trump an Agent of Saudi Arabia, and Other Pressing Questions Buried under Biden’s Age

A jury found Robert Menendez guilty on all charges yesterday, including those alleging he accepted payments from Egypt and Qatar (I didn’t follow the trial closely enough to figure out which country ultimately provided the gold). The verdict marks DOJ’s first successful conviction under 18 USC 219, basically, working for a foreign country while serving as a member of Congress.

Henry Cuellar faces the same charge.

While the RNC largely overshadowed the verdict, Chuck Schumer, Cory Booker, and Governor Phil Murphy have all called on Menendez to step down.

The reasons why he should resign seem obvious: You can’t continue to serve the people of New Jersey after a jury determined you were actually using your position of power to serve two wealthy foreign countries.

Is Trump a Saudi foreign agent?

And yet we are two days into Trump’s nomination party, and no one has asked — much less answered — whether Donald Trump is a business partner, paid foreign agent, or merely an employee of Saudi Arabia.

This is not a frivolous question. Since Trump left office, his family has received millions in four known deals from the Saudis:

  • A deal to host LIV golf tournaments. Forbes recently reported that Trump Organization made less than $800K for about half the tournaments it has hosted. But Trump’s role in the scheme has given credibility to an influence-peddling scheme that aims to supplant the PGA’s influence. When Vivek Ramaswamy learned that two consultants to his campaign were simultaneously working for LIV, he forced them to resign to avoid the worries of influence-peddling. Yet Trump has continued to host the Saudis at his properties.
  • A $2 billion investment in Jared Kushner’s private equity firm, in spite of the fact that analysts raised many concerns about the investment, including that he was charging too much and had no experience.
  • A deal to brand a property in Oman slated to open in 2028, which has already brought Trump Organization $5 million. The government of Oman is a key partner in the deal, signed with a huge Saudi construction firm.
  • A newly-announced deal with the same construction firm involved in the Oman deal, this time to brand a Trump Tower in Jeddah.

These Saudi deals come on top of Trump’s testimony that Turnberry golf course and his Bedford property couldn’t be overvalued because some Saudi would be willing to overpay for them.

But I believe I could sell that LIV Golf for a fortune, Saudi Arabia. I believe I could sell that to a lot of people for numbers that would be astronomical because it is like — very much like owning a great painting.

[snip]

I just felt when I saw that, I thought it was high. But I could see it — as a whole, I could see it if this were s0ld to one buyer from Saudi Arabia — I believe it’s the best house in the State of New York.

And while Eric Trump, not his dad, is running the company, Eric also has a role in the campaign and his spouse Lara has taken over the entire GOP.

Trump never fulfilled the promises to distance himself from his companies in the first term. A very partial review of Trump Organization financial records show the company received over $600K from the Saudis during his first term. As far as I’m aware, no one has even asked this time around.

Which means as things stand, Trump would be the sole beneficiary of payments from key Saudi investors if he became President again. Trump would be, at the very least, the beneficiary of a business deal with the Saudis, as president.

Admittedly, under the Supreme Court’s latest ruling on gratuities, it might be legal for Trump to get a bunch of swank branding deals as appreciation for launder Saudi Arabia’s reputation (one of the things for which Menendez was just convicted).

But that doesn’t mean it should be ignored, politically. It doesn’t mean American voters shouldn’t know these details. It doesn’t mean journalists (besides NYT’s Eric Lipton, whose most recent story on this was buried on page A7) shouldn’t demand answers.

What deals has Trump made with Putin and/or Orbán?

At some point at the RNC, Don Jr claimed that his Daddy would get poor coverage from real journalists because “they lied about Russia Russia Russia.”

Only, they didn’t.

In guilty pleas, Trump’s people confessed that they were the ones lying. George Papadopoulos lied to hide when he learned of the Russian hack-and-leak operation. Mike Flynn lied to hide his efforts to undermine Barack Obama’s foreign policy with Russia. Micahel Cohen lied to hide his contact with the Kremlin during the campaign in pursuit of the kind of Trump Tower deal Trump has since inked with the Saudis.

Don Jr was spared charges, in part, because he’s too dumb to be expected to know he shouldn’t accept campaign dirt from Russian nationals.

Robert Mueller found that Trump’s campaign manager briefed someone Treasury has since labeled a Russian spy, Konstantin Kilimnik, on his plan to win the Rust Belt, even while discussing a deal to carve up Ukraine and get tens of millions in benefits. Kilimnik passed on polling data and the campaign strategy to Russian spies. Amy Berman Jackson ruled that Paul Manafort lied to hide that.

At the time the FBI obtained Roger Stone’s cell site location in August 2018, they had reason to believe he had gotten advance notice of both the dcleaks and the Guccifer 2.0 releases. Stone had multiple contacts with Trump about the releases and prosecutors hoped to obtain a notebook where Stone documented all of those conversations. A jury found that Stone lied to hide whence he learned all this.

Trump pardoned all but Cohen and Jr for the lies they told to hide what really happened with Russia. And we still don’t know why the clemency for Roger Stone Trump stashed in his desk drawer had a Secret document on Macron associated with it.

And Trump has only gotten more shameless since. In 2019, during his impeachment for extorting Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Joe Biden and his kid, Trump was warned that among the Ukrainians from whom Rudy Giuliani was soliciting dirt on the Bidens was at least one Russian agent, Andrii Derkach.

Trump did nothing to stop Rudy from sidling up to a Russian agent. And when Rudy came back, Bill Barr set up a side channel to ingest that dirt — a side channel the resulted in an FBI informant with self-professed ties to Russian spies attempting to frame Joe Biden for bribery, an attempt to frame Biden that likely goes a long way to explain why the plea deal against Hunter Biden collapsed.

Once upon a time, it was a big deal that Trump refused to let an activist make the RNC platform’s defense of Ukraine more hawkish.

Now, however, Trump no longer hides that he’s willing to let Putin dismember Ukraine. He welcomed Viktor Orbán’s pitch of a plan to do just that — but there has been no readout from Trump’s side of what happened. Orbán, however, has told other EU nations that Trump will moved for “peace” immediately after being elected — a replay of what Flynn lied to cover up in 2017 — largely by withdrawing US support for Ukraine.

In the past, Trump has gone even further than this, suggesting he’ll do nothing as Putin invades NATO states.

Meanwhile, JD Vance is, if anything, even more pro-Russian than Trump, as are some of the Silicon Valley oligarchs who now back Trump’s campaign since the Vance pick.

Trump’s plan of capitulation to Russia will go a long way to ending the Western rules-based order, the greatest wish of Putin and Xi Jinpeng.

And thus far we know just one of the things that Russia seems to be doing to help Trump’s campaign: detaining WSJ reporter Evan Gershkovich until Trump gets elected, just as Iran held onto hostages to help Reagan get elected. Avril Haines recently made clear Russia is planning on helping in other ways as well.

That’s how “Russia Russia Russia” has worked. It’s a shameless lie that Mueller found nothing, a lie built off years of propaganda. Indeed, Trump’s willing acceptance — or, in Rudy’s case, outright solicitation — of Russia’s help to get elected has only gotten more brazen. Yet rather than call Don Jr on his “Russia Russia Russia” lie, reporters simply let the pressing question of whether Trump will end the alliance of democracies in a second term go unasked.

What happened to the missing classified documents?

Amid the focus on Aileen Cannon’s stall then dismissal of Trump’s stolen documents charges, something has been missed: There appear to be documents missing. Here’s what we know:

  • According to the indictment that Judge Cannon just threw out, after Trump tricked Evan Corcoran into searching only about half the boxes containing stolen documents, he flew to Bedminster with “several” of the boxes he had excluded from the search.
  • In July 2022, Trump and Walt Nauta snuck back to Mar-a-Lago from Bedminster — to check on the boxes, one witness told Jack Smith.
  • When the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago on August 8, 2022, they failed to search a closet in his bedroom to which he had added a new lock.
  • Several searches overseen by Tim Parlatore found no new documents, though he did find a new classified document folder.

Given FBI’s failure to do a complete search adn Parlatore’s failure to find documents at Bedminster, the most likely way to learn what happened to them would be to get Walt Nauta to flip, something that, as I suggested here, his indictment might normally have done. But (correct, as it turned out) expectations that the prosecution would go away kept Nauta from cooperating.

And as a result, we have literally no idea how many documents Trump managed to withhold from the FBI’s search, or what he did with them.

The continued focus on Joe Biden’s three year seniority over Trump

Again, this kind of betrayal of America once mattered in Trump’s campaigns.

No longer.

It’s not happening because journalists are so cowardly they can be cowed with a mere “Russia Russia Russia” chant.

And it’s not happening because journalists have lost all sense of proportion — and for many of them, all sense of public good.

Journalists are making much of a confrontation between Jason Crow and Biden, related by Julia Ioffe, in which Biden insisted he had been great on foreign policy.

The campaign did not, however, dispute this next part, about Crow and his Bronze Star. In a video of the Zoom that I was able to view, you can hear Biden chastising Crow, who asked about the importance of national security to voters. “First of all, I think you’re dead wrong on national security,” the president says, the emotion at times garbling his words. “You saw what happened recently in terms of the meeting we had with NATO. I put NATO together. Name me a foreign leader who thinks I’m not the most effective leader in the world on foreign policy. Tell me! Tell me who the hell that is! Tell me who put NATO back together! Tell me who enlarged NATO, tell me who did the Pacific basin! Tell me who did something that you’ve never done with your Bronze Star like my son—and I’m proud of your leadership, but guess what, what’s happening, we’ve got Korea and Japan working together, I put Aukus together, anyway! … Things are in chaos, and I’m bringing some order to it. And again, find me a world leader who’s an ally of ours who doesn’t think I’m the most respected person they’ve ever—”

“It’s not breaking through, Mr. President,” said Crow, “to our voters.”

“You oughta talk about it!” Biden shot back, listing his accomplishments yet again. “On national security, nobody has been a better president than I’ve been. Name me one. Name me one! So I don’t want to hear that crap!”

It’s another instance where Biden responds stubbornly when Democrats try to push the president to drop out of the race. And that’s why reporters are gleefully dunking on Biden’s comments.

But it’s also an instance where Biden is making a really good point: He has restored America’s alliances to what they were before Trump destroyed them.

And the press is only telling that story — and doesn’t even realize that they are only telling that story — as part of their singular obsession with Biden’s age.

It’s a confession, really, that they have abdicated any concern for the kind of accomplishments of which Biden is justifiably bragging (ignoring Gaza). They have been bullied out of covering any of Trump’s glaring betrayals of the country the leadership of which he wants to monetize.

Trump might literally be an agent of a foreign power — just like Robert Menendez has been adjudged — and this mob calling themselves journalists would exhibit the least interest, much less persistent concern. Journalists don’t even care that both of Trump’s most suspect foreign allegiances involve the exploitation of journalists for political gain, first Jamal Khashoggi and then Gershkovich. Journalists have ignored that recent history, even after he picked Vance, someone who formally asked Merrick Garland to criminally investigate Robert Kagan (a neocon whom Vance called left wing) for inciting insurrection because he discussed liberal states resisting Trump in a second term.

Trump might literally sell out the next journalist who opposes him to be chopped up by some foreign dictator. And yet the press corps seems not to give a rat’s ass.

Because Joe Biden is three years older than Donald Trump.

image_print
103 replies
  1. Upisdown says:

    That latest Zoom report has me on the verge of giving up. There is ZERO chance of defeating Trump when both the media and the Democratic Party are combining against Joe Biden. The clock is ticking, and we are further than ever away from switching focus back to Project 2025, the overturning of Roe, January 6th, 34 felony convictions, E. Jean Carroll, Putin, the Mar-a-Lago case, or Trump’s fraud convictions. We cannot count on corporate media helping, so it’s up to the Party to prove they are united and that they can re-elect Biden, flaws and all.

    I don’t know what the answer is. All I know is that things have been going from bad to worse in this race, and time is flying by.

      • Upisdown says:

        That was a while ago, and he was basing it on an open convention – which I do not support.

    • Rayne says:

      I would like you to seriously consider the difference between what foreign influence operations might say about Trump’s opposition and what you just blathered off in 125 words which were nearly all off topic AND THE FIRST COMMENT in this post.

      You want a disciplined response to the threat? Start with yourself — stop dropping your emotional crap here and do something constructive if you can’t write something edifying or expansive on the topic of the post.

      • Clare Kelly says:

        Re: “I don’t know what the answer is.”

        I suggest amplifying Marcy’s column far and wide: Your Reps, your Senators, and any journalists within your sphere of influence.

        I don’t think anyone is “pretending that there is nothing to worry about”.

      • Upisdown says:

        To Clare Kelly, That is not an “answer”. That is one very reasonable action that is most likely going nowhere with corporate media filtering their chosen narrative. And I sincerely doubt that any members of the Dem caucus are unaware of the important facts listed by Marcy.

        All I am saying is that we need to address the immediate campaign issue. Dems look in disarray because we are. Something has to give or else we lose an election that never should have been closely contested. It’s not that we can’t all clearly see the reasons why Joe Biden should stay in, or why he should drop out. It is now way beyond that point. One side or the other has to concede and the entire party must coalesce around one choice the way Republicans have around Trump.

        I’m okay with either. I just do not want to see us keep arguing this matter thru November 6th.

        • Rayne says:

          Not. On. Topic. Again. -___-

          Your previous comment has been trashed because you do NOT run this site and tell moderators and contributors what to write.

          Marcy took the pains to write this post so that it was discussed and readers here made a point to press for better journalism.

    • emptywheel says:

      Upisdown

      Let me reiterate Rayne’s point.

      Think of the comments as our living room. I spend a lot of time writing these things. To have someone barge into the living room to loudly ignore the topic as soon as I post is the kind of thing that makes me rethinking inviting certain guests to the living room.

      • Ginevra diBenci says:

        Tim Snyder’s On Tyranny is a How-NOT-To manual. Number One: Do not obey in advance.

        We need to make this our mantra. Hard as it is, especially without the sense of leadership Dems feel right now, plowing ahead remains essential. We need to galvanize the vote for the (D), not the person, or there won’t be any D left to support.

  2. phred says:

    You are a treasure EW, thank you for this.

    It’s mind blowing how bad the corporate press coverage of Biden has been. They are unable to cover governance and policy any more. It’s all election coverage all the time. And they can’t get enough of Trump, whether loving him (Fox) or hating him (MSNBC) coverage of our actual elected officials doing their job has largely vaporized.

    I love that Biden is finally calling this out in his speeches and interviews: “Politics isn’t reality TV”. Damn straight Mr. President, keep up the good work!

    If Crow (and his Dem associates who appear to have lost their minds) is fretting about what is breaking through to voters, then they need to demand better from reporters who ask them questions. Biden did a great job pushing back on Lester Holt. Crow could learn a thing or two from Biden.

    Crow should get himself and his staff out there promoting the work they have done, are doing, and plan to do. But nope, he would rather whine behind (not entirely) closed doors.

    It has not escaped my notice that most of those desperate to dump Biden hail from the centrist wing of the party. I can’t help but feel that this whole smear campaign is less about Biden’s age than his effectiveness. The more progressive faction in the party has been instrumental in Biden’s success and I think that is what is freaking out the conservative faction.

  3. Frederick_12JUN2024_1054h says:

    It doesn’t matter. The lies and allegations of foreign collusion have been pointed out ad nauseum for the better part of a decade now. The only thing that changes the trajectory of things as they stand is a major reset from the ground up.

    [Welcome to emptywheel. THIRD REQUEST: Please choose and use a unique username with a minimum of 8 letters. We have adopted this minimum standard to support community security. Because your username is far too common (there are other Fredericks/Frederics/Freds in this community) it will be temporarily changed to match the date/time of your first known comment until you have a new compliant username. Thanks. /~Rayne]

    • Upisdown says:

      The subtitle for “Project 2025” could be: “A Kleptocrat’s Guide to the Galaxy”

  4. harpie says:

    Crow: “It’s not breaking through, Mr. President, to our voters.”
    Biden: “You oughta talk about it!”

    Exactly! What do these Dems think? This is just going to fall into our laps?!?! FFS.

    • phred says:

      What you said, harpie!

      For too long Dems have meekly let the press (& Republicans) drive the narrative of the news cycle. It’s time they grabbed the steering wheel and change its direction.

      • Dustbowl Observer says:

        Here is an example.
        It’s late in G. W. Bush’s disastrous Iraq war and no WMD have been found.
        Nicole Wallace comes on an MSNC show as spokesperson for Bush to push the latest disaster, privatization of Social Security.
        The host asks her about the disaster in Iraq, about immediate plans, about why there were no WMD anywhere.
        Her answer? Simple.
        “I am not here to talk about.” and then follows with “Social Security as it exists today is going to go broke and we need to save it. President Bush … blah blah blah.”
        That’s how you do it.

        Let’s say we are maybe focusing on women’s healthcare. And someone asks about the assassination attempt on Trump.
        You say: “Mr. Trump came within an inch of his life. That is what they are doing to women in Texas. They are forcing them to get within an inch of their lives before extremist Republican draconian laws even allow the doctors to intervene and treat them. This is a travesty and an abuse of women, and it must stop!”

        That would be, of course, if Dems were able to possibly focus on one issue.

        Republicans have done this for four years. Here is one on an MSNBC show. “You are asking me about interest rates? We have open borders to the South and an invasion of foreigners flooding this country with crime, and if we didn’t have that we would not have any problem with inflation and high interest rates!”

        It is time that Dems start looking in the mirror about how they are allowing the other side to dictate the meme of the day and the terms of the debate.

    • Clare Kelly says:

      I’ve received a few panicked texts from Ukranian American friends regarding Orban and JD Vance.

      I’m doubling down on GOTV efforts.

      • Rugger_9 says:

        They have good reason. Orban is a Putin acolyte and Vance is the most anti-Ukraine Senator with his isolationist rhetoric.

        It didn’t work out for America in the 1930s either.

        • Fly by Night says:

          Let’s not forget Woodrow Wilson was also an extreme isolationist. Thinking America is so great that we can stand alone and ignore the happenings in the rest of the world is a recipe for disaster.

  5. Zirczirc says:

    “Several searches overseen by Tim Parlatore found any new documents, though he did find a new classified document folder.”

    I’m not following this bullet item. “Parlatore found no new documents . . .”? “Parlatore did not find any new documents . . .”? It seems a negative is missing.

    Zirc

  6. Out of Nowhere says:

    It seems we live in a journalistic era presaged by Jefferson Airplane in their White Rabbit lyrics – “When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead.”

  7. Matt Foley says:

    But…but he gave up his POTUS salary!

    I refused to watch the red hat revival last night. Did anyone mention the record high stock market under Biden? My 401k is up 49% under Biden.

    • Spencer Dawkins says:

      I was watching Michael Popok talking about all the current GOP convention delegates who have been indicted for some flavor of the “fake elector” scheme, and I can’t help but wonder if any of them have been released under conditions like “not associating with convicted felons” … which does describe Trump …

      • Matt Foley says:

        emptywheel, MeidasTouch esp. Filipkowski, and Brian Tyler Cohen keep me from going insane from the non-stop firehose of MAGA lies and misdirection. The media is WAY too focused on Biden’s age and not on the danger of Orange Hitler. I knew he was bad news back in 2016 but he and his cult have gotten more dangerous and out of touch with reality than I ever thought possible.

  8. Miranda Levy says:

    I am so frustrated with the media and our judicial system. Between the relentless negative coverage of JB after the debate and the throwing out of the documents case I feel like the media is doing everything to re-elect DT. I don’t know why this story about the days leading up to the debate did not get more coverage but it shows that the debate should have been postponed.
    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/05/biden-sick-debate-camp-david-00166624
    I know, I know JB would have been called a coward but that would have been better than what actually happened.Postponing isn’t cancelling.
    It’s time for Democrats to stop this so public fighting and unite behind JB. After all if the Republicans can unite behind a twice impeached, convicted felon we can unite behind an old guy with a list of great accomplishments.

    • earthworm says:

      well known “circular firing squad” of the Dems and liberals.
      makes one want to say, man up and defend your candidate, pantywaists!

  9. Clare Kelly says:

    Marcy wrote:
    “But that doesn’t mean it should be ignored, politically. It doesn’t mean American voters shouldn’t know these details. It doesn’t mean journalists (besides NYT’s Eric Lipton, whose most recent story on this was buried on page A7) shouldn’t demand answers.”

    To merely say “thank you” is inadequate, but…thank you.

    I’ve sent this column to public editors, trusted columnists, a few journalists, Reps, and Senators.

    I’m hoping others here do the same.

  10. Rayne says:

    COMMUNITY MEMBERS: The topic of this post is not Joe Biden’s age. It’s not about Joe Biden’s health.

    It’s about U.S. journalism’s failure to report on critically important topics like Trump’s ongoing criminal behavior and Biden’s success as a president, reporting on which could change the outcome of the election.

    A comment made at 9:59 am focused on Biden’s age rather than the post’s topic; a number of established commenters followed up with off-topic replies. The first comment in that sub-thread was made by a community member who has been here only one year and made only 15 comments. That comment has now been removed and the replies hidden as the comment derailed the thread.

    Pay attention to this mechanism: this is how easily community members are being manipulated, and it’s the same way in which the media has been generating content rather than actually doing reporting. The media has been ginning out easy material its readers fall for reflexively rather than doing more challenging work because readers fail to push back and demand better.

    This same mechanism is also in play in domestic and foreign influence operations. If it’s this easy to persuade savvy readers to ignore critically important topics (ex. Is Trump an agent of Saudi Arabia or other hostile countries), it is easy to screw with US media. Stop falling for this and remind the news media they need to do better.

  11. Rugger_9 says:

    I thank EW for reminding us about the boxes that took the grand tour of NJ and back to FL which were not included in the search as far as I know. Could DoJ charge Convict-1 for mishandling those docs, in FL, NJ or even DC since these were NARA-owned anyhow?

    It also reminds me that there are too many ways to leverage Convict-1 in office. The famed Jared deal was a personal favor of MBS, and he’s a guy who doesn’t do favors for free. Likewise, Orban visited M-a-L (I don’t think he met with Joe Biden) for a reason and given how close Orban has been toeing the Putin line I’ll speculate Orban was a messenger with complete diplomatic immunity as a head of state.

    We still haven’t seen the taxes (promised since 2016) and we don’t even have a medical report for Convict-1 3+ days after the Butler PA shooting. My guess is that the exam records would show some inconvenient details.

    • Rugger_9 says:

      I’d like to see Smith raise the question in his briefing about how obstruction of justice / investigation is a core or peripheral Presidential duty.

        • Rugger_9 says:

          That’s the other elephant in the room, but I was anticipating the claim that Convict-1 declassified them with pixie dust while in office. However, it would be interesting to see how the SCOTUS majority will do legalistic gymnastics to square the circle.

  12. Clare Kelly says:

    Re:”in my opinion it needs to be up for discussion vs simply discounting it as simple age-ism or whatever.”

    I see no dearth of “discussion” or speculation regarding POTUS’ “cognitive state”.

    Frankly, I’m going to have a very difficult time voting for Adam Schiff and am not responding to any fundraising texts from legislators who have publicly (rather than privately) aired their fears about President Biden.

    • Magbeth4 says:

      I, too am perplexed by Schiff’s comments. What is his motive? I had such admiration for his service in the House. Hopping on the get-rid-of-Biden horse is a mystery.

      • Clare Kelly says:

        Re: “ What is his motive?”

        IMHO, hubris.

        Speaker Emeritus Pelosi’s endorsement of him in the California Senate primary was, if not an unethical move, certainly an unusual one.

      • Chirrut Imwe says:

        Jeez – they need to stop with the circular firing squad already. R’s have circled the wagons, and this is only giving them more ammo.

        Apologies for the gun analogies…

    • synergies says:

      True that except the stakes are way way too high to not vote for Schiff. He’s completely lost all support from me along with a lot of us Ca. voters. In the primary even the total of Katie Porter’s total 1,118,429, + Barbara Lee’s total 717,129 = 1,835,558 is less than Steve Garvey’s total 2,301,351. Unfortunately I believe Katie should have waited. Orange County is just barely hitting the 50/50 line. In 6 years she could have been elected the first Senator from Orange County. Barbara Lee should have stayed as a Congressperson also.
      The silver lining is one thing about us Democrats, we don’t forget. In 6 years hopefully there will be a young or older Democratic star to rightfully hold this seat. The caveat that I’ve relayed for years: One doesn’t down the Democrat Presidential candidate. The gop NEVER does. They win. Think trumpster… & his new (I’m really not a Saudi $ communist oligarch dictator) lapdog Vance + lapdog Putin +. One could do a cartoon. Nauseating!

  13. SVFranklinS says:

    Biden’s achievements internationally have been nothing short of amazing.
    I never thought you could get Korea and Japan into a trilateral summit, but there it was. Anyone who spent time in east Asia would know how difficult that must have been.
    But it’s all water under the bridge, and, hey, did you know, Biden is old?

    McKay Coppins has an article in the Atlantic this morning (6/17) about how fear is now permeating through elected officials. I think fear is playing a big part in the press reaction – If they cross MAGA, they get death threats, and their owners have an agenda but their market share and influence is shrinking. Hard to do the right thing.

    But they are not afraid of Biden because he’s a decent guy, so piling on is easy. And guess what, Biden is old – not untrue. I have doubts that he’s up for 4 more years, but guess what – he doesn’t have to be (that’s why there is a constitutional succession plan), and Trump isn’t even up to actually do the real job of President for ANY years, let alone 4.

    By the way, Marcy, we admire you greatly for pulling this together, proof it’s not impossible to do journalism. But how do you cope with the fear factor? Is it there? or does being in Ireland give enough distance?

  14. harpie says:

    ew: But (correct, as it turned out) expectations that the prosecution would go away kept Nauta from cooperating.

    3/19/24 Roger STONE at Catholics Prayer for Trump at Mar-a-Lago

    […] “We are beating them,” Stone tells Sammarco. “[Trump’s] trial in Georgia is falling apart. I think the judge is on the verge of dismissing the charges against him in Florida. They’re delayed in New York City and they’re now delayed in Washington.” […]

    From
    ‘Lawyers, Judges, Technology’: Roger Stone Touts Plan for Trump Win in Secret Recording Liberal documentary filmmaker Lauren Windsor’s team spoke to the “dirty trickster” of right-wing politics at an event at Mar-a-Lago https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/roger-stone-plan-trump-win-lawyers-judges-technology-1235041650/ Nikki McCann Ramirez June18, 2024

  15. P J Evans says:

    Biden is, according to his doctors, NOT suffering from dementia, and he certainly doesn’t show signs of it in his speeches.

    • BuffaloNick says:

      I sincerely hope that his speeches are more indicative of his actual capabilities than the debate. I think my biggest issue is we can’t talk about some of the signs Trump is showing many of the same signs that I witnessed in my family members who went down with Alzheimer’s, but not as stark as was on display last month by Biden.

      My question really is what do we do if the next debate is the same or even worse perception of mental decline by Biden, and it was not just a “one-off”. Right now I understand and hope that that one night was the exception and not the current state, but if it was more indicative of his day to day life, what then?

    • Swamp Thing says:

      Physically, Biden is probably not in as good shape as Trump is, but intellectually, psychologically, emotionally, socially, Trump is not in Biden’s ball park. Neither of them is a riveting public speaker but Trump can’t complete a coherent sentence and shows real signs of dementia.
      Biden is actually good at being president while Trump is abysmal at it, especially in matters of foreign policy. It’s really not even a toss-up without media interference. Can Biden last for four more years? Can’t say, but that’s why we have a vice president.

      • Dark Phoenix says:

        “Physically, Biden is probably not in as good shape as Trump is” – No matter how many times the media says this, I don’t believe it for a second. One exercises every day. The other won’t eat anything but fast food and gets 3 hours of sleep every day.

      • earlofhuntingdon says:

        The claim that Trump is in better physical or mental condition than Biden is a campaign slogan. It would be true only if the examining physician were Ronny Jackson, in one of his rare moments of sobriety. It’s false.

  16. Sussex Trafalgar says:

    An outstanding piece that highlights how the MBS Saudi led organized crime syndicate works together with the Putin led organized crime syndicate to control the world’s strategic resources in Saudi Arabia, Russia, the Donbas and elsewhere in the world.

    Trump and Orbán were both identified long ago by Putin and Semion Mogilevich as corruptible narcissists and pathological liars.

    Putin has had his eyes on controlling the US strategic resources for decades now.

    And in Trump, Putin has found the cheapest method of gaining control of those US resources.

  17. David F. Snyder says:

    OT but important ad related:
    I ask anyone thinking that Biden needs to step out should study the “13 keys to the white house” (link below — factors determined by Lichtman and Keilis-Borok in 1981 — and these factors have correctly predicted the winner since then, every presidential election) and tell me which advantage is gained by switching the DNC POTUS candidate (hint: there ain’t one!). We have an incumbent running against a former incumbent; ditching the sway of Biden’s incumbency is a gamble Dems shouldn’t be making when the stakes are this high. And, no, the aura of incumbency does not transfer to the VP, not in the real world.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Keys_to_the_White_House

    • Rayne says:

      That you felt compelled to mark a comment as OT (off topic) should have given you pause, especially after Marcy’s comment more than an hour before yours.

      If the subject of your comment is about Joe Biden’s age, health, or change in candidacy, don’t drop it in threads where media is being criticized for failing to focus on topics other than Joe Biden’s age, health, or change in candidacy.

  18. ExRacerX says:

    “It is the cognitive state that is worrying.”

    You’ve gotta be talking about Trump, right?

    I mean, the guy’s a walking, talking brain-fart. He can’t even remember what he said in the previous sentence.

    • Matt Foley says:

      Hundreds of examples but two of my favorites are from his deposition:
      “That’s Marla. That’s my wife.”
      –Trump describing photo of E. Jean Carroll

      “I don’t recall but I can get that info for you.”
      –Trump when asked when he was married to Marla

  19. rockfarmer says:

    Thank you, Marcy, for another excellent piece that should be required reading for every journalist in the country. Thank you, as well, to the many informed, intelligent commenters who advance the salient points and issues made and/or raised by Marcy. To those who are joining in the conversation to simply wring your hands, yes, please do that elsewhere. I’m surrounded in my own life by plenty of despairing folks who are doing nothing to get out the vote, thanks very much, and I don’t want to deal with that here. We need courage and GOTV action now, not despair.

    • SVFranklinS says:

      Very much agree – GOP/Trump is doing nothing to expand beyond the MAGA inner circle, so the path to their victory is to degrade and demoralize the opposition. The Biden is old/Dems can’t make a decision agenda serves that purpose.

      It’s a form of political judo, getting your opponent to trip themselves up. Don’t fall for it.

  20. joel fisher says:

    Thoughts not in order of importance:
    1) In the bowels of every big media entity is a drone whose job is to make the journalists aware that people need to engage if the entity is going to stay in business. Hence, the dog bites man coverage of Trump the liar–yawn–and the man bites dog coverage of is, Biden too senile–whoa!–to be President. That’s why EW is important.
    2) One must remember the two most significant things about Trump:
    a) His constant lying; and b) His absolutely transactional nature.
    These features of the Trump personalty landscape are not seriously debated by either friend or foe. Think about it: what’s a future in office President Trump got to gain? Now, support; post inauguration, nothing. What will the hard right folk have to offer? Some long, boring planning book about white people and their needs? He’s not going to read it; he never reads any book. He’s going to ask some trusted lackey, “What do they want and what’s in it for me?” The answer to the latter question will be, “Nothing”. So don’t get your hopes up Heritage Foundation; he won’t need you anymore. Putin could offer to distribute Trump Vodka in Russia and that would be something, but Putin better not count on Trump. If he gets elected again, I predict 4 years of cashing in, speeches about sharks and batteries, and golf, lots of golf.
    3) Putin special mention: If anything is constant about Trump it’s his way of screwing people. When it’s Guiliani, DeSantis, or others could I name, it brings me great joy. Trump could suddenly adhere, as he says he will, to a coherent, hard right policy agenda and chumminess with Putin but I’m going to take the odds and say the ideological human filth–very much including Putin–that support him now are going to end up dumpeded if he ends up back in the WH. “Hey, wait a minute, he forgot to pay me.”
    4) At this time 4 years ago morons like me were slapping ourselves on the back as we eyed the polls and the Trump campaign.

  21. Ravenclaw says:

    Thank you for one of your finest, most cogent posts summarizing so many investigations. Might be worth adding that the reason Mueller gave for not prosecuting Don Jr. et al. based on the notorious meeting with Russian agents was that, although they were almost certainly guilty, it would be difficult to obtain a conviction “in the face of a spirited defense” (quoting from memory, probably not 100% accurate). Making prosecutorial decisions based on whether you believe you have a >95% chance of success guarantees a double standard in the justice system: if you can afford serious representation, you can get away with a lot. But yeah, part of that was because Don Jr. could convincingly be portrayed (by his legal team) as a dumb cluck.

  22. Spencer Dawkins says:

    I apologize if this sounds snippy, but what “we all saw” was Biden, who spends a lot of time talking to people who aren’t lying to his face, trying to figure out in real time what Trump was lying about to Biden’s face, and deciding how to respond to each lie as it went past. If responding to lies in real time is what you’re looking for in a president, the current media coverage is exactly what you need to make a decision. If you think being the head of the executive branch also matters, you might not want to read too much into what “we all saw”.

  23. originalK says:

    I call bullshit on the “I would be concerned for my relative” cliche – Biden is doing more each day than every younger person I know, with much more optimism and sociability. He has huge accomplishments domestically (infrastructure projects and economy) and is regularly landing three-pointers for people who follow international politics.

    Were you not paying attention during the first Trump administration? Did you not catch the tape of Trump talking to RFK Jr.? Have you read none of the transcripts behind the glossy Trump interviews?

    Even the two quotes EW highlighted here reflect that Trump is a bunch of mindless chatter with a side of bullying, backed by a posse of morally and ethically challenged caretakers, and Biden is an experienced, competent, and knowledgeable part of a (supposed) team, who vote with him 100% of the time, but apparently have other agendas.

  24. Frank Anon says:

    Politics is all about perception, is not at all fair. If 75% of the members of a particular political party indicate they would rather have another candidate, that candidate doesn’t have a basis of support and should step aside, even if he is a superlative president in all respects. Presidential elections are more than just a comparison of two records, platforms or positions, they are a temperature-taking of 350 million people. The debate crystalized a lingering perception that Joe wasn’t up to it anymore, and that can never be un-rung. In an election that will literally define our future, with the actual specter of American citizens lining up for political asylum in third countries (!), there is no room for error at all. Its not the weak “Dems in disarray” trope, America itself is on the line and Joe’s feelings should not matter at all. Would he be the best president of all potential candidates – Yes – If he loses will our lives change forever – Yes. I for one will do anything to increase the odds of winning. It is my very personal opinion that he can’t win.

    • Bill Crowder says:

      The devil or the deep blue sea.

      I agree that a sterling record seems to make no difference to the vast number of Americans. How we got this far as a democracy has become a mystery to me.

      If the Dems wait until the next debate to fish or cut bait, and if President Biden projects the same image as in the first debate, we are screwed.

      If the Dems dump President Biden now, we (or at least I) have no idea how that will play out in the election.

      I think we have to take the gamble of putting forth a new presidential candidate. 51-49.

    • originalK says:

      So you figure, rather than, for example, dem representatives from AZ – and all the other “Four Corners” states – getting together to explain why a second Trump presidency would imperil many of our most precious public assets in their region they should instead send out hackneyed press releases with scant evidence for the numbers you cite and the outcome you predict?

      Here’s the conclusion of that article,

      Even while Biden has used the Antiquities act to restore those two monuments in Utah, and also establish five new ones and expand two more, he’s also grown domestic production of oil and gas to record levels.

      So what is the right complaining about? Biden’s energy record has resulted in massive new energy exports, never-before-seen levels of compensation for oil and gas executives, paid shareholders record dividends, and created a booming market for jobs in the energy sector—sounds like a far-right dream. This administration has proven that new and expanded national monuments can coexist with extraction.

    • Just Some Guy says:

      “If 75% of the members of a particular political party indicate they would rather have another candidate, that candidate doesn’t have a basis of support and should step aside, even if he is a superlative president in all respects.”

      Adam Schiff, George Clooney, and a bunch of nobodies /= 75%.

    • Rayne says:

      Your comment is off topic and reveals exactly how badly the media has failed to do its job — like the media which you’ve consumed, you can’t concentrate on Biden’s effectiveness and his opponent’s frequently criminal behavior in and out of office.

      Own it: it is YOU who has a problem with your own “lingering perception,” you who can’t escape the media’s narrative, you who read the topic of this post and can’t discuss it, instead reflexively going off topic.

  25. earlofhuntingdon says:

    Trump packs a lot into his notion that it’s impossible to overstate the value of an asset, because he can persuade some unidentified Saudi to overpay for it. For starters, his claim is speculation. That’s irrelevant to establishing fair market value.

    Sure, real estate is full of ignorant buyers who overpay. They don’t know the market or property, and they don’t negotiate and value real estate deals for a living. Those characteristics are unlikely to apply to professional investors working for the Saudi government, royal family, or other billionaires. They are less likely to apply to deals with a likely or current President of the United States and his immediate family.

    Jared Kushner, despite his degree from Harvard, and his JD/MBA from NYU, wildly overpaid for his signature NYC property. Saudi buyers eventually bailed him out, but it wasn’t because they were stupid enough to overpay for a building in Manhattan. They were investing in the Trump family, either as payback or for future favors. The same with their awarding Jared $2 billion or so to invest for them, despite his having zero experience doing that.

    On the one hand, Jared overpaid when he bought that property, owing to bad timing, ignorance, hubris, desperation, or whatever. On the other hand, the Saudis made an investment in the Trump family, above and beyond the real estate for which they put up money. That’s not overpaying. It’s a separate transaction, with a different purpose and valuation, laundered into the first. A lot of Trump deals are like that.

    • ExRacerX says:

      You nailed it, earl. I think this might be one of your longer posts, but every word was necessary.

    • Molly Pitcher says:

      This is an exceptional piece Marcy

      Earl of H, I am curious how the battle for supremacy between the Saudi/Putin faction and the Dark Money/Leonard Leo/Heritage/Crow/Koch, et.al. faction shakes out. I don’t see Trump making it thru four years if he gets in office. I think JD Vance is there to take the long-term roll. Why would you trust a Christian Kingdom to a doofus like Trump, when you can have a young megalomaniac like Vance in the roll for a generation ?

      • earlofhuntingdon says:

        I agree that, like every other contestant, Vance is betting he gets the job sooner than four years from now. (One reason I laugh at those who say Trump is more physically and mentally fit than Biden.) Most of their billionaire patrons are probably betting on that, too.

        Vance is the least qualified of the short-listed candidates to be either president of vice president. In fact, he’s unqualified. Thankfully, the Heritage Foundation and a long list of peers will be there to tell him how to do it. But that won’t help much when the emergency call comes in at 3.00 am. So, who the chief of staff and other top WH officials are becomes even more important than it was Trump’s first go round.

        • Matt___B says:

          (nit-picking here): But, but…by virtue of his having served as a U.S. senator for 18 months, that makes him at least somewhat more qualified than Trump, who never held any office before becoming Prez. And…does his mis-use of a Yale education trump (ouch!) Trump’s lack of learning at Fordham?

          BTW, I get your point. Though it wouldn’t be good to turn to John McEntee at 3 a.m. for advice either.

        • Molly Pitcher says:

          I am interested in your views on what I see as competition between the Christian Nationalists and the Saudi/Putin axis ?

        • earlofhuntingdon says:

          Time served is not the sole criteria. Vance is 39, and spent about a decade in private equity, which is disqualifying in my view. He has also spent nearly all his few months in the Senate running for VP. So how much does he really know about the Senate, Congress, or running the USG?

          As for nits, Donald Trump famously has a degree in “economics,” from the University of Pennsylvania (not the more famous finance degree from its Wharton School), not Fordham. There’s some question about how much of the work he did himself, how much others did, and how much daddy Fred’s wealth convinced Penn to give him a degree. despite questions about his “C” average, the minimum qualification for its award. (The same sort of degree GW Bush received at Yale, to which his family had sent its scions for several generations.)

  26. earlofhuntingdon says:

    Oh, and big international construction deals tend to be plum venues for money laundering and payback.

  27. BriceFNC says:

    In 2022 the Democrats lost control of the house over inflation. The Democratic messaging machine failed to connect a typical Trump transactional deal as the root cause of most of that inflation. In April 2020 Trump (a long time opponent of OPEC) cut a deal with OPEC+ (OpEC along with Russia and Iran) to reduce worldwide oil production by 10%. April 2020 was the point when oil futures consistently fell below $20 per barrel—and some days even traded in negative territory due to lack of storage! Impacts of that deal include:

    1. Five dollar gas through November mid terms,
    2. Russia able to invade Ukraine using influx of petroleum dollars,
    3. Iran flush with cash to fund Hamas and Hezbollah,
    4. Big oil pleased to reassert dominance as small operators went belly up and sold assets to them at bargain prices,
    5. Saudi’s more closely aligned than ever with Trump. Jared gets $2-3B from Bone Saw despite no experience as hedge fund manager and Saudi economic council advising against investing with Jared!

    Final irony, guy who talks America First agreed to an additional 350M barrel US cut after Mexico’s Lopez Obrador threatened to block OPEC+ deal because he needed money from nationalized PEMEX to fund his county’s COVID response!

    Why are Democratic PR team so limited. It is not all about abortion! A good part of our inflation was energy driven
    Trump blows smoke at us about the greatest economy ever but in reality we were in lockdown. This is not conspiracy theory check Forbes April 2020!

    [Welcome back to emptywheel. THIRD REQUEST: Please use the SAME USERNAME and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment as “BriceNC1”; it has been edited to reflect your established site standard-compliant username. Please make a note of it and check your browser’s cache and autofill. Future mismatches in username may result in your comment not clearing moderation. /~Rayne]

    • Matt Foley says:

      Thank you for that, BriceFNC. Similarly, Trump encouraged antivaxers’ “personal choice” and “liberty over safety”, then blamed Biden for more covid deaths. Infuriating.

  28. Harry Eagar says:

    I don’t know if it is true, as reported, that Silicon Valley (whoever that is) is turning to trump. If it is true, I wonder what Mr. Valley thinks of trump’s statement (to Businessweek) that as president he might not/would not resist Chinese pressure on Taiwan.

    I am old enough to remember when the US gummint staked its all on the retention of Quemoy and Matsu. That was a bipartisan stand but more Republican than Democrat.

    It looks as if in my declining years I will have to unlearn everything I learned in my yoot.

  29. observiter says:

    Thank you, Marcy, for this very important article. It’s disturbing to read but right on target. I remain confounded as to the media/journalists and also the Democratic strategists/publicists. My mother said to me once that I may expect too much from people. I’ve been pondering that recently in regard to a doctor I’ve seen. But I do expect professional competence from those working at a particular job, especially/particularly when they’ve been at it awhile. The points you bring up are part of this.

    I, a “layman,” recognize the strategies the Republicans employ to attract attention and sway the News and public opinion. None of it is new tactics. Why then do I feel great frustration regarding areas you write about and what I see the Democrats doing/not doing.

    One nothing-new observation: The Democrats tend to be highly intellectual in how they communicate — with each other and to others via the news. This does not always translate well to the masses, who may not have the patience nor background to fully understand the details and implications. Hello…hello Democratic Party…is anybody there?

    All Biden has accomplished is lost in the fog. All we hear about is (nonsense re) his age and cognitive functioning. I’m absolutely astonished that the Democrats sit there on their hands. For the past year plus, Trump’s cognitive functioning has been a subject of concern by the public and doctors. Yet suddenly, the topic has not only disappeared regarding Trump, but successfully shifted to Biden, whether it actually applies to Biden or not.

    Biden’s problem is his life-long challenges with speech (stuttering), which he has primarily overcome. He has NEVER been known as an accomplished orator — someone who sways audiences and moves mountains. If Biden were indeed gifted in this regard, I believe he would be much more formidable in this race.

    But this is not his gift, and everyone knows it. They knew it when he ran the first time, and they know it now. I’m thinking this is probably/possibly the reason for the those pushing for him to leave at this moment, but what do I know. It seems like an act of desperation. But it is inexcusable for Biden’s accomplishments to sit in the shadows. Yes, I do expect much more from those people experienced in politics and in interacting with the Media.

    Thank you, Marcy.

  30. Error Prone says:

    Blinken might ultimately not be able to rein in Netanyahu, not entirely, but he can work to contain intentional to indifferent excessive loss of lives in Gaza. And he can keep pressing for a two-state goal. Pompeo, if in again, would be encouraging Bibi, saying it was fulfilling a Biblical necessity. A prerequisite for the Second Coming.

    I like Blinken better. Now, who’s offering us Blinken and restraint? And that’s a part of what? Engagement. Biden would not round up people and send them away when that would inflate grocery prices because of the job concentration of new entrants in field work and packing houses. Dumb policies that have easily seen adverse consequences should be vetted by the press. But it might have to be pointed out to them. Fewer workers being worked harder is part of media today. The reporters might appreciate a helpful thought.

    Obama picked Biden and together they had to mop up the Bush economic crash. They did. Then Trump gets in with Jarad put in charge of Covid responses? People died over that gross negligence.

    After Bush economic disaster was fixed it was back to disaster under Trump, so what’s the sensible forecast if Biden loses?

  31. MsJennyMD says:

    Thank you. Excellent article. What comes to mind regarding Viktor Orban, is the Danube Institute and the Heritage Foundation cooperating as two conservative think tanks interested in authoritarianism.

  32. Dark Phoenix says:

    Well, it appears that the Dem Party is busy finishing off the greatest self-own in the history of politics, because now Obama is calling for Joe Biden to end his candidacy. Hey, millions of voters who voted for Joe Biden in the primary; the Dem party says fuck you, the billionaires and the insiders know better who the candidate should be.
    Now watch them start kneecapping Kamala Harris immediately after Joe announces he’s out, because Kamala was their target from minute one.

    • Rayne says:

      Did you deliberately choose to ignore the topic of this post, in spite of Marcy’s comment and mineregarding staying on topic?

      This is particularly annoying since your email address and IP address both suggest you’re Canadian, and you’ve been at this site only since 2020 with 184 comments.

      You’ve managed to encourage and contribute to (7) off topic replies, derailing conversation about the topic. Don’t do this again. Unless the post notes it is an open thread, comments are to remain on topic.

      COMMUNITY MEMBERS: Pay attention to the commenters who are going off topic, but don’t follow them in that direction. If you don’t grasp the topic of the posts at this site, this may not be the place for you. I am not joking around about readers here potentially being manipulated in comments.

      (Time of publication on this comment has been changed to elevate it above the replies.)

    • ButteredToast says:

      This isn’t logical. If “Kamala was their target from minute one,” wouldn’t these unnamed “billionaires and[ ]insiders” just insist Biden remain the presumptive nominee, since he currently is? That would be easier than persuading both him and Harris not to run.

      • Dark Phoenix says:

        Joe’s been more progressive than the rich donors expected, so they don’t want him. But they also really don’t want Kamala Harris; they want a white man.
        If the last four years had been Obama 3, they’d probably push for just removing Kamala Harris.

        • ButteredToast says:

          Not everything is a nefarious conspiracy. My read of the situation is that some Democratic politicians (including Pelosi, Schumer, Obama, Jamie Raskin, and various congresspeople in tough races) are concerned by exactly what they say: Biden’s electability and the downballot consequences of a poor performance by the top of the ticket. Do you really believe that these lifelong Democrats, who worked closely with Biden to pass his legislative agenda, want to replace him because he’s too progressive?

          Now, they may be incorrect in their assessment of the political landscape. But I don’t think impugning their motives is justified. They have months worth of public polling to support their positions, including Senate Democrats consistently polling ahead of Biden, and have their own internal polling as well. They have years worth of political experience and have been talking to Democratic caucus members and party leaders across the country, who know their states and districts. Some concerned members of Congress have won multiple tough races, in which they have to win over swing voters and even Republicans. All of these people have more experience and information than the average voter does, so I don’t think their opinions should be dismissed out of hand.

    • Rugger_9 says:

      Indeed, but if Biden’s doc says OK, fine.

      However, the party still has not coalesced behind one or at most two options. Several names have been floated but none of them ran in the primaries. I would also observe that while Biden was getting 80%+ in his races, the equally unopposed Convict-1 was getting 60s.

      Also, there is still no medical report from Saturday’s event regarding Convict-1, perhaps he s&&%^%t his Depends. Compare and contrast that with the relentless feeding frenzy about Biden’s health and phony concerns about Biden ‘gingerly’ moving around. I hate to tell these bozos that COVID tends to knock people on their arse.

      As a direct comparison, we have the Comer Clown Committee demanding to have the WH doctors submit to closed-door questioning but are equally OK with the Convict-1 jail avoidance campaign not providing any information at all about their candidate’s health. Let’s see how the speech goes tonight.

      • Dark Phoenix says:

        What REALLY gets me is that to show that “other Dems poll better than Joe Biden”, they’re now testing various canddiates against Donald Trump head-to-head… And it hasn’t gone unnoticed that it’s Kamala Harris, Gretchen Whitmer, and a parate of White Male Centrists…
        The fact that the most common candidate for testing is a White Male Centrist tells you what kind of candidate the rich donors would like. (And who the heck suggested mostly unknown Maryland Governor Wes Moore?)

    • Clare Kelly says:

      The WaPo piece, written by Tyler Pager and Michael Scherer, sites the following as sources for the definitive and provocative lede:
      “according to multiple people briefed on his thinking.”

      Noted at the end of the piece:
      “A spokesperson for Obama declined to comment.”

      I can’t speak to the veracity of the claim, but I can speak to SPJ Code of Ethics on anonymous sources:

      “The SPJ’s Ethics Committee’s position paper on anonymous sources says journalists should use unnamed sources only as a last resort: “To protect their credibility and the credibility of their stories, reporters should use every possible avenue to confirm and attribute information before relying on unnamed sources.”
      [snip]

      “Also, stories must explain the reasons for anonymity, provide as much information as possible about the source”
      https://www.spj.org/ethics-papers-anonymity.asp

      Multiple outlets are reiterating WaPo’s lede.

      Smdh.

      I’m not linking to the WaPo piece for personal reasons.

    • MsJennyMD says:

      Are desperate Democrats leaking to the press? At this point, sounds like ageism and harassment. The disrespect for President Biden is discouraging and damaging. Political Democrats telling me who to vote for and deciding for me to toss the President off the ballot and out of the race is unacceptable. I voted for him in the primary. I will vote for him in November. Democrats are their own worst enemy.

  33. AndreLgreco says:

    The press will shortly chase the next shiny object, being the DNC in Chicago. It’s going to be even shinier with a potential change of horses at the top and Gaza-fueled demonstrations a la 1968. It’s all about the show at this point and logic be damned.

  34. observiter says:

    I came across a relevant, current interview with Allan Lichtman, professor of history at American University. I found his comments, and the discussion, to be interesting and refreshing, and on-topic to Marcy’s article.

    I understand he has a long record of successfully IDing the winner of major elections. He lightly describes his analysis methods during the discussion.
    https://youtu.be/7tMgHGeEGzg

  35. mospeck says:

    Marcy, you carry on the good fight. We’re only 100 days out from when the asteroid hits and the networks have already carried out Sleepy Joe for being dead already, but the Holt interview proves Joe is otherwise and that he may be our last best chance:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0iXoqTMnx4
    Somehow we need for the next gen to get off of their tuffets, feel a little more el positivo and get a fire under their boiler plates to vote the new world in (guy who wrote this was an immigrant who caught bad luck and is long gone)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLobgQ_oAho

    • Rayne says:

      Worry about the oldsters who see no difference in which party takes office because they are blind to their own privilege.

      While younger voters especially BIPOC didn’t turn out as strongly in 2022, they may not have been fired up by mid-term candidates; suppressive efforts may have worked as well, along with the media’s usual bullshit horse race coverage instead of reporting the stakes. Exhibit A: George Santos.

Comments are closed.