Stolen Documents Motions to Dismiss

Trump and at least Carlos De Oliveira are filing motions to dismiss (some are being unsealed via a review process). I’ll post them here until I read in more detail.

De Oliveira MTD or Bill of Particulars

Trump’s claim of presidential immunity to steal documents

Trump’s claim that he’s too stupid ot understand 18 USC 793(e)

Trump’s Special Counsel claim (repeating Hunter Biden’s appropriation claim)

Trump’s claim the Presidential Records Act says the opposite of what it says with assist from John Solomon

Still to come: A motion to suppress the search of Mar-a-Lago

Notice of pretrial motions

21 replies
  1. EW Moderation Team says:

    A reminder to all new and existing community members participating in comments:

    — We have been moving to a new minimum standard to support community security over the last year. Usernames should be unique and a minimum of 8 letters.

    — We do not require a valid, working email, but you must use the same email address each time you publish a comment here. **Single use disposable email addresses do not meet this standard.**

    — If you have been commenting here but have less than 1000 comments published and been participating less than 10 years as of October 2022, you must update your username to match the new standard.

    Thank you.

  2. David F. Snyder says:

    Those really should be the titles of those motions. At some point, the judge would get annoyed at being forced to read and respond carefully to these spurious motions: delay, delay, delay.

    • Matt___B says:

      Agree! “Defendant’s Stupidity Claim”, “Defendant’s Right to Steal Claim”, “Defendant’s Word Salad (DARVO) Claim”.

      (Truth in legal advertising)…

    • dopefish says:

      Judge Cannon? If the way she’s managed the case so far is any indication, we might be waiting a long time.

  3. Michael8748 says:

    “Trumps claim he’s too stupid ‘to” understand”.
    I’m dying laughing over here, so perfect, and then some.

    [Welcome back to emptywheel. Please use the same username and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. Do not add a URL if you did not enter one with your first comment; do NOT add the URL of this site. Thanks. /~Rayne]

  4. Hamhock96 says:

    It has never been anything but abuse of process. Endless repetition of the same nonsense in venue after venue.

    [Welcome back to emptywheel. Please use the SAME username and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. This is your FOURTH username; you have previously published comments here as “Doris Allen” “SFosters” and “SFoster.” If you attempt a fifth username you will be banned. /~Rayne]

  5. NickBarnes says:

    Who wrote this sentence? Wow. “While that might ordinarily be semantic, it is less so where this matter involved at least two grand juries were convened in the District of Columbia and in the Southern District
    of Florida.”

    • scroogemcduck says:

      When Trumpland sends its people, they’re not sending their best. […] They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing fraud. They’re bringing insurrection. They’re rapists (under the commonly understood meaning of that term, not the criminal definition under New York State law). And some, I assume, are good people

  6. jecojeco says:

    Until SCOTUS acts on presidential immunity trump’s lawyers will confetti the legal system with immunity claims. If trump can mentally declassify records and take them as souvenirs what stops a President from taking any/allUS docs. If presidential immunity covers murder then it certainly must cover grand theft.

    If SCOTUS is still rational this process of throwing presidential immunity claims recklessly at very serious charges should force them to do something definitive, sooner than later. If they don’t act they’re encouraging it and encouraging more crazy from Cannon

    trumps legal moves (incl moving NY business addresses to FL in response to NY fraud verdict) are so desperate & wacky trump must be calling all the shots – unsurprising of course.

  7. klynn says:

    “Trump’s claim that he’s too stupid to understand 18 USC 793(e)”

    THAT is a perfect admission in an election year!

    But didn’t he claim in the last election and during 2018 that he was very intelligent? https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/10/10/times-trump-bragged-about-intelligence-orig-alee.cnn

    He claimed to be a “stable genius” in 2018.
    https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/949619270631256064?
    Perhaps he’ll clarify that meant he was good with horses.

  8. Rugger_9 says:

    This torrent of delaying motions should surprise no one because it’s about tactical delays for Defendant-1. However, IMHNALO I can’t see the wisdom of putting Cannon on the spot with these because she will have to rule on them and SC Smith can then go over her head to the 11th Circuit. Also, at least one of them may be mooted by SCOTUS if they uphold Judge Chutkan and the DCC.

        • Operandi says:

          They’re all so utterly meritless that I find it impossible to distinguish which of them might fly furthest after getting chucked down a stairwell. Of course, that’s assuming we’re operating under normal laws. We’ve already seen Cannon basically invent law for him before. And once we’re inventing law, the sky’s the limit.

          That said, the presidential immunity claim would be my favorite right now for “most likely to cause delay”. Even if Cannon denies it, I’m sure she’ll readily agree they need to pause trial to the maximum extent possible while he chases appeals.

      • Raven Eye says:

        Your comment caused me to pause: Word for a single strand? It seems that the word is “spaghetto”.

        (Blame it on Saturday morning, pre-breakfast)

Comments are closed.