Hunter Biden Gets a Step Closer to Vindicating Twitter’s Takedown Decision
Yesterday, as things moved closer to an expulsion vote for George Santos, activist “Anarchy Princess” taunted Santos staffer, Vish Burra, about whether he hacked Hunter Biden’s phone.
AP: Like the same way that you got into Hunter Biden’s stuff?
VB: [laughter]
AP: Yeah, didn’t you hack Hunter Biden’s shit, his phone or something?
VB: [turns to camera] Yeah, and I’d do it again.
Burra, who in 2020 was the producer of Steve Bannon’s podcast, has previously described “extracting” the contents of the “laptop” and took credit for hooking Bannon up with Emma-Jo Morris, who published the initial NY Post story.
Hunter Biden described Burra’s past claims in his lawsuit against Rudy Giuliani and Robert Costello for unlawfully accessing and manipulating his data.
As further evidence of Defendants’ illegal hacking of Plaintiff’s data, it recently has come to light that Defendant Giuliani apparently worked directly with Steve Bannon and Vish Burra to access, manipulate, and copy Plaintiff’s “laptop,” which Burra has dubbed the “Manhattan Project” because he and others “were essentially creating a nuclear political weapon,” referring to Burra’s work with Defendant Giuliani and others (Steve Bannon and Bernie Kerik) to manipulate the “laptop.”
But Burra has not, as far as I know, confessed to “hack[ing] Hunter Biden’s shit.”
Yesterday — whether in jest or not — he did.
Later that same day, Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger had their semi-annual appearance before Jim Jordan’s Weaponizing Government committee.
At the hearing, Dan Goldman had this exchange with Shellenberger about the “Hunter Biden” “laptop:”
DG: You’ve talked about the Hunter Biden laptop, and how the FBI knew it existed. You are aware, of course, that the laptop, so to speak, was actually — that was published in the New York Post was actually a hard drive that the NY Post admitted — here! — was not authenticated as real. It was not the laptop the FBI had. You’re aware of that, right?
MS: It was the same contents.
DG: How do you know?
MS: Because it’s the same —
DG: You would have to authenticate it to know it was the same contents. You have no idea.
MS: [inaudible] conspiracy. Are you suggesting the NY Post participated in a conspiracy to construct the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop?
DG: No, sir, the problem is that hard drives can be manipulated by Rudy Giuliani or Russia.
MS: What’s the evidence that that happened?
DG: Well, there is actual evidence of it, but the point —
MS: There’s no evidence of it. You’re engaged in a conspiracy theory.
Miranda Devine (who keeps dog-whistling about Hunter Biden’s “expensive” lawyers) and the House GOP all seem to think this was a very clever exchange, as that’s the clip they all sent out to froth up the rubes.
Goldman is right: You’d need to authenticate the contents of the “laptop.” As I have shown, even the FBI had not checked whether anything was altered on the laptop they received while in John Paul Mac Isaac’s custody, ten months after receiving it. Their computer guy was still suggesting ways to do that on October 22, 2020, over a week after the NY Post story was published. At the time, Lesley Wolf — the villain of the Republican story — was in no rush to do so.
Understand, though: the critical question here is not whether the hard drive was authenticated. The question is whether it was hacked. Here’s how Vijaya Gadde described the decision to take down the original NY Post link in October 2020.
For example, on October 14th, 2020, the New York Post tweeted articles about Hunter Biden’s laptop with embedded images that look like they may have been obtained through hacking. In 2018, we had developed a policy intended to, to prevent Twitter from becoming a dumping ground for hacked materials. We applied this policy to the New York Post tweets and blocked links to the articles embedding those source materials. At no point did Twitter otherwise prevent tweeting, reporting, discussing or describing the contents of Mr. Biden’s laptop.
If the data in NY Post’s hands was hacked, then according to Twitter’s terms of service, links to it should have been taken down.
If the data in NY Post’s hands was hacked, then the takedown that Republicans claim was a violation of their speech was, in fact, adherence to Twitter’s terms of service as they existed at the time.
And Hunter Biden’s lawsuit alleges that Rudy Giuliani and Robert Costello unlawfully accessed — hacked — his data.
And yesterday, Burra — the guy who set up the tie between Bannon and the NY Post in the first place — laughingly agreed that he did hack Hunter Biden’s shit.
Now, Michael Shellenberger says there’s no evidence the data on the hard drive was altered by Burra and others. Miranda Devine says you have to take the word of the Bidens to believe that happened.
They said that the same day Burra laughingly said he would hack Hunter Biden again.
More importantly, you don’t have to go to the Bidens for evidence that the hard drive was altered. You can go to Garrett Ziegler, whom Hunter Biden has also accused of hacking his shit.
In the set of emails publicly released by Ziegler at BidenLaptopEmails dot com, there is an email from Hunter Biden’s Rosemont Seneca email account (hosted by Gmail), that was sent on September 1, 2020 ET (September 2 GMT).
It’s a resent version of an email sent in 2016 (DDOS says that a footer was also altered).
If everything John Paul Mac Isaac says is true, if everything Rudy Giuliani says is true, this “laptop” was in the custody of Rudy Giuliani (or Robert Costello, on Rudy’s behalf) on the date it was sent. Whoever resent this email — and it was sent over a year after Hunter left Burisma — it was added to the “laptop” while it was in Rudy’s custody.
I’ll leave it to the lawyers and the tech people to explain how an email set from an account hosted by Gmail was added to the hard drive from which Garrett Ziegler obtained his copy. I’ll leave it to the lawyers to argue about whether it would necessarily require unauthorized access to Hunter Biden’s Gmail or iCloud account for that email to be on the hard drive.
But it’s something that could not have been on the laptop when someone — allegedly Hunter Biden — dropped off a laptop at John Paul Mac Isaac’s shop on April 12, 2019. By all understandings of the dissemination of various hard drives — which Thomas Fine has illustrated this way — it would have been on what NY Post worked from on its October 14, 2020 story.
There’s no evidence, Michael Shellenberger said. You’re supposed to take the words of the Bidens, Miranda Devine said.
And on the same day they made those claims, Vish Burra said, of hacking Hunter Biden’s stuff, “Yeah, and I’d do it again.”
Ever notice how so many of these MAGA actors have criminal rap sheets?
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/vish-burra-george-santos
There’s always some GOP office holder willing to employ them, too. Reminds me of Mitch McConnell hiring Jesse Benton.
I admit, I mostly get lost when Marcy is “in the weeds”, but this…!!!!!
Right? I read THAT and my eyebrows went up and a loud, “Damn Marcy! You’re AMAZING,” bellowed!
If we’re not careful, Rudy might reach into his drawers and pull out his sub-penis. Just sayin’.
https://youtu.be/M3b1tQco530
That’s why the Hunter Biden trial will be held by Gym Jordan and James Comer. I’m waiting for Weiss to (very quietly) admit he’s got nothing in a Friday news dump dominated by some other RWNM crisis (heck, we’re overdue for another stab at HRC emails). It’s still a little way off, because Weiss is also using the power of the SC to try to extract ‘evidence’ from HB, which is running into legitimate roadblocks put up by Abbe Lowell. HB really lucked out to find Lowell.
I will speculate that the ‘tell’ will be when Weiss asks for delays in the trial process (the reasons don’t matter) to try to position this into 2024, say around March to May.
Bookmarking this because we need to do more than discuss it in comments. We need to cut it off at the pass.
You tell me when you think the right time is to pull the trigger — preferably before a Friday — and I’ll put up a post about the way the public’s attention is being played using this model.
Coincidentally, today would be the perfect day for right-wing scumbuckets to drop content in a news dump thanks to that scofflaw George Santos and Sandra Day O’Connor’s death.
#bookmark_OpRedirect
It would be a good day given what happened to Santos today, but I don’t think Weiss is done on his side.
Would Wiess ‘manufacture’ evidence? I am not saying that at all, but I do know that anything Weiss does dig up will become fodder for the MAGA nuts in their committees to blow all over the place. This isn’t about Weiss but Jordan/Comer.
As a case in point, we have discussed the lack of credibility of Taibbi, Shapley, J Ziegler, Mac Isaac, et al in this blog yet many of them are being invited to speak in public hearings and lie. We had another one this week, so it’s not a small issue. It’s also what happened to the Mueller report.
Weiss SHOULD be weighing in on Hunter’s subpoena request.
Weiss won’t close up until this subpoena is done bc if he’s held in contempt it’ll get sent right to Weiss.
But I also suspect, particularly given that Clark has dropped off, they’ll try to reopen 2018 by claiming that Hunter lied at a time he was totally sober. He’s a prosecutor. He has unlimited capability of stringing this out.
For now, Comer and Jordan will continue to wear out the paddles trying to shock a heartbeat into their flatlined investigations.
They will ignore requests to call it. They’ll just keep shouting “clear” as they go on Fox or hold another nothing press conference.
Wow, good stuff here, Burra admitting to hacking Hunter’s shit. From a technical point, what does that mean though? Did the hack occur back in early 2019 and Burra received an already hacked hard drive? And Hunter hadn’t changed his password in that time?
Also, I’m bracing myself for some Grassley propaganda from the Federalist, let’s see.
It might be enough to shut down Weiss’ investigation, because what other evidence does he really have without the laptop that is not the subject of a plea deal? IANAL, but I can only speculate that Lowell will make full use of this detail in his attempt to call it selective and/or malicious prosecution.
It is my belief that Hunter was hacked in January to February 2019, probably building off earlier compromises of his Apple account going back years. Whether he brought the laptop or someone else did to JPMI — or computers were swapped — what really matters is that the laptop had been packaged up to make it really easy to unzip the rest of his life.
Which Rudy and friends proceeded to do.
I can’t prove that, though, w/o subpoena power.
Pardon my ignorance, but can’t one of the Senate committees dig into this as well?
Does Dan Goldman (or Jamie Raskin, e.g.) know about this email sent 1 Sept 2020? Did you just find it, EW? It would seem to be the perfect gotcha point for one of them to zing at Shellenberger/Taibbi/the public in a hearing like these. Nothing sings louder or more on-pitch than dates that reveal how linear time gives the lie to the story being sold.
This is worthy of Law & Order!
No. I didn’t just find it. When Goldman said there was evidence of alteration, this email may have been included in his reference. Those of us who’ve looked at this closely all know about the anomalies (the DDOS report lays some of them out well).
There are also some later emails sent. They’re the easy way for people to understand that Hunter’s claims that his data was hacked are not frivolous.
I wouldn’t mind seeing dates attributed to the drive copies and the IT person that associates IP addresses and dates to accessing both the gmail and iCloud accounts post laptop drop off will win a pulitzer.
Not how the Pulitzers work but okay, welcome to emptywheel.
It’s weird how the the name was changed from “Joan Mayer” (2016 email) to “Joan Peugh” (2020 email) in the cc line. What’s up with that?!
Maybe this person got married in the intervening four years?
Looks like she’s used both her maiden and married name since she got married in 2014.
Sometimes it’s more of a pain in the arse to change names at work, especially for DoD affiliated entities because of the documentation to prove it’s the same person. My beloved kept hers at work for that reason.
This is why I went with a hybrid name — persons in other organizations with which I was affiliated would still recognize my name (and my father’s name). But it has been a pain in the butt to explain this for +30 years. If I’d kept my maiden name I’d still have to explain to the spouse’s family on the regular, to my kids’ friends and their parents…ugh. This culture is not kind to women who try to build and keep their own identity.
Well, you’ve never explained that to me (or maybe you did and I forgot), not in almost 20 years, and I love the story.
I love that story (and love your hybrid last name.
As for me, I never changed bc we couldn’t figure out a hybrid that didn’t sound like the equivalent of Vomit Wagon, plus I already had my PhD in my name. Now I’m glad it makes it somewhat harder to associate him with me.
LOL I don’t know if we ever discussed my name. My father was fairly well known in this community; people seeing his name knew him from his workplace or church or from his participation in charitable civic organizations. Some recognize my association with my sibling who still uses the same family name.
My spouse’s family is recognized in his hometown as well as several other west Michigan cities because they owned a chain of businesses under their name. (Nowadays I run into people here who think I must be related to his second cousins who share the same name.)
I really preferred being recognized by my dad’s name locally. But the hybrid combination is all kinds of awkward (“How do you pronounce THAT?” they’ll ask before making weird noises). And then there’s the place in the alphabet and seating or turns…
I can understand entirely why you are Dr. Wheeler — you made the right choice, IMO.
Would bet on Peugh/Mayer using Peugh in business for very similar reasons.
Plus, as you will appreciate, doing local politics in Ann Arbor with the last name of Wheeler was a lot of fun. Alma and Conan and I used to joke about it a lot. I’d call her my aunt and people would gently tell me she was Black.
I think you know this: But Alma’s sister married us. She did not keep her prominent father’s name. We raised it during the ceremony and she implied she regretted changing her name, doubly bless my decision to keep my father’s name, effectively.
What? You’re not related to Alma and Conan?? LOL
No, I didn’t know Alma’s sister was your officiant — that’s pretty awesome.
Isn’t it? And really we were just looking for a judge over the weekend.
It never bothered me that my beloved still uses the maiden name, and according to our two girls I’m ‘such a guy’…
I suppose I’m an outlier.
Yes, you’re an outlier. My spouse had been fine with it as I had warned him for years before we got our marriage license. The day we got our license he was shocked my name wasn’t going to be the same as his. *eye roll*
He never has to explain his name — it’s not as if it was an inconvenience to him.
Friend got married. Both of them were known professionally, and neither wanted to change names. (He said “Mr X” was her father, and she claimed “Mrs Y” was his mother.) So they both kept the names they were known by. It’s been 45 years…
That doesn’t mean the wife never had to explain her name. I’ve been married north of 30 years and I still get asked on occasion why my name isn’t exactly the same as my spouse’s.
My mother said she was reminded there could always be another Mrs. (My Father’s first) and (last Name). She kept her first name, then maiden name/initial, followed by His last name for her official signature/ID after marriage. She had been employed professionally and was not married til around age 30 in the early 1950s. Before hyphenation was a thing.
I am “another Mrs.” but that didn’t enter into my calculus when deciding on my name. Unfortunately mass mail marketing can’t make the distinction and I’ve gotten three decades of marketing with the first Mrs. name and my name cobbled together sent to addresses at which she never lived. *sigh*
When my mother–a computer programmer in the 60s–married my father, another manager in the department was also named Wheeler.
It caused quite a scandal, not least bc her printouts added to the confusion.
Then she got pregnant and that was the end to her technical career for a decade or so.
Reminds me of a WWII military acronym that might have been continued in the I’ve Been Moved culture. PWP: Pregnant Without Permission. Naturally, that meant automatic resignation or dismissal.
This discussion about last names reminds me that in the era when a lot of people expected the ERA to pass, it was common for women to keep their last name, instead of adopting their husband’s. We seem to have regressed in ways I doubted could happen at the time.
One option back in the day was for both spouses to agree on a new last name that they both adopted.
Laughing. When my ex tried to sue me for custody of my two oldest kids, they made a big deal about all my “aliases” I stuck with my exes last name while oldest were at school cause teachers wouldn’t answer me but would answer my ex. Kids had his name. Then I hyphenated, and finally dropped the ex’s name. It felt yucky to keep the ex’s name instead of my maiden name. But license said ex’s name. Gawd it’s true what a headache! Plus I am a Mary Kathleen, called Katie. That adds another few aliases. So true!! They were tryn to make me look like a criminal. The lawyer kept drawing attention to my all my names.
A Joan Peugh 29 ( in consulting and financial advisory employed by Rosemont Seneca) married a Johnathan Mayer 32 (in real estate) in a glamorous wedding at Park Hyatt Hotel DC 15 Nov 2014
That likely is a clue to what the technical nature of this was.
It would mean the resent email pulled from a contact list that had been updated in the interim.
I’ve already got real questions about whether the contact list was altered in more significant way before that.
I don’t know enough about iOS apps but my gut says somebody used a sync feature, possibly looking for more new data, and in doing so refreshed a contact name.
Yes. That is my suspicion.
There are all sorts of weird automatic email releases in the email set. Big tells.
In order for a sync feature to work, doesn’t the account need to be logged in with current password? Would it be weird for the same password be used after a year and a half? With all of the devices that are lost and new devices logged into not needing to click “forgot password” and create a new one? That would be impressive to me.
A couple of other interesting issues, there is a PDF of a Burisma-related email “Urgent Issues” that was saved a bit after midnight 10/9/19, so hours after Parnas was arrested and a few hours before that news became public, and after Mac Isaac had possession of the laptop, theoretically before it made its way to Rudy.
https://pdfa.org/hunter-bidens-email-and-the-potential-for-deepfakes-with-pdf/
And the Dimetrelos Report records that on 2/10/19 an email from 2018 being saved in a nested folder, an email which contains a Burisma related signature. Though that was a period before Hunter allegedly turned over the laptop, there is not a reason provided why Hunter would be re-saving the 2018 signature scan attachment email or looking for his own signature.
(paragraph 45: https://www.scribd.com/document/575556723/Final-Hunter-Biden-Laptop-Report-Redacted
Yes, you and I have talked about that 10/10/19 one, and I promise you I’ve got a 70% written post on it. Not to ruin my punchline, but you’ll note that JPMI said he sent Rudy a note on 10/8/19 that by logic should have had that 10/10/19 PDF in it. JPMI has never, AFAIK, produced that note to Rudy.
I’m agnostic about which parts of the timeline JPMI got right and which the FBI did. But that PDF suggests that JPMI switched that date.
As to the February stuff: There is a technical explanation that does not involve others. There is one that requires others. I think the latter is more likely but, again, without subpoena power, I can’t prove I’m right. There is a bunch in the January to February 2019 period that is consistent with Hunter being hacked.
I definitely look forward to reading that upcoming article.
Though Mac Isaac does not claim to have “sent” the letter to Rudy in October 2019. He claims to have wrote it and printed it out on October 8, 2019. But gave to a friend along with a copy of the hard drive, as an insurance plan to give to Rudy in case of emergency. Hunter mentions in his Delaware lawsuit w Mac Isaac.
Mac Isaac, nearly a year later gave that copy to Costello after his alleged first overtures/communications with Rudy/Costello, which was through Rudy’s website.
Hard drive AND thumb drive, with a few specific emails.
Also: Re the password. Remember that Hunter didn’t know his laptop had been stolen until October 2020.
I’m talking about password changing just from everyday usage, getting new devices and adding accounts and not remembering passwords, etc, not from suspecting account compromise. He has gone through a lot of devices.
Yes. But with many of them, he did not change his password afterwards. That’s why it might be impossible to answer who packaged up Hunter’s stuff: because for the year leading up to the laptop being dropped off, numerous people got his stuff, and you can never tell whether they were just another junkie or someone sent to compromise him.
I don’t know how a sync feature works in iOS apps. Syncing isn’t necessarily the same as updating data (ie. re-attaching a device to a network to retrieve new/recent mail); the former would match all local and remote data where the latter would merely append existing with new data since the last dated file. Both, IMO, would require a password.
But I think there are a couple other compounding factors, one of which I noted to Marcy wrt a change in Google Calendar wrt emailed notifications. The devices in question, all of them whether hard drives in/out of laptops, iPads/tablets, or phones, were subject to application updates by both iOS and Google depending on the apps used and settings on the devices. Did automatic app updates cause any of the differences in data? Did forced/pulled updates? Did cross-platform updates affect the data presentation? Did differences in settings regarding app updates affect how different devices handled data (ie. one device may have automatic app updates, another may have updates on demand only).
That said, I don’t think updates explain the resent 2016 email. Footers which contain meta data shouldn’t change with app updates. Updates also do not have anything to do with the PDF and the signature you’ve cited — they’re off the beaten path for app updates.
Oh, that makes sense. I enjoyed the thread about the names. I don’t have anything to add to that, except that 40+ years ago I knew someone who wasn’t named Peugh but was named Pugh. And, ironically, when I moved away, he sent me a letter with a dick pic! A Polaroid. LOL.
eeugh-Pugh!
Would that imply that the re-sent email came from a computer that also had a Rosemont Seneca email account? Or at least a computer that had exchanged further emails with Joan in the intervening period?
As an example, today I emailed with a catering person at a local restaurant— several years back I had done the same. While the email address was the same, the name in quotations was the former holder of that position (someone I had emailed pre-Covid). So the name doesn’t get updated automatically until you email them again.
I apologize in advance to the more tech savvy if this question makes little/no sense.
I can go back and look, but I think Hunter’s contact book changed when her last name did.
One thing I’m obsessed about is that as the laptop was being packaged up, the contacts were restored, from something. So it would have been easy to make it appear like some messages from say, John, were actually from Julie.
Marcy, above:
That LINK is really interesting, especially the included TimeLine,
which I’m in the process of comparing to #J6TL.
Release: Hunter Biden emails (3.6 GB) DDoSecrets identifies signs of altered or implanted emails in the dataset distributed by Trump allies. We are mirroring the data with significant warnings // DISTRIBUTED DENIAL OF SECRETS https://ddosecrets.substack.com/p/release-hunter-biden-emails-36-gb MAY 21, 2022
The dates of the changes noted in that TL:
9/28/19 Creation date of some of the PDF files used in the 10/14/20 NYP story
10/10/19 Creation date of some of the PDF files used in the 10/14/20 NYP story
******
8/31/20 Creation of two blank email replies to a 2014 email on the topic of a recommendation letter
9/1/20 Creation of two draft emails; they are added to the cache as a reply to an email from 2014
9/1/20 Creation of new folders on their copy of the laptop drive [WaPo]
9/2/20 Creation of more new folders on their copy of the laptop drive [WaPo]
9/2/20 Creation of a variation of a Burisma email from 2016; it is added to the cache. A phone number in the footer of the email is redacted and replaced with “Sent from my iPad”
10/XX/20 Addition of three more directories; someone from a West Coast location [Nunes?] may have accessed the copy of the drive that WaPo later analyzed.
11/3/20 [ELECTION DAY] Creation of two blank emails which are inserted with no recipient, subject or body
Thanks, Harpie!
“…Sent from my iPad” ?
Interesting. Has there been any other instance of an iPad coming up in the time period after the alleged drop off at the Mac Shop in April 2019? I can’t seem to think of any.
According to the Dimitrelos Report, there were 3 devices trusted to the icloud account as of mid March 2019. There was an iPad listed, that along with the Mac Isaac laptop, has a “Device Last Heartbeat IP” address which is at Ablow’s Cottage rental where Hunter had left in early February.
I’m trying to do a TL incorporating the information in this post with the #J6TL
[and connecting with this “dates of the changes noted in that TL” comment].
Also, using this:
The FORMER GUY’s PURLOINED PAPERS #TFGPP [listed by DATE]: https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/06/14/trump-and-nautas-release-conditions/#comment-997540
And TRUMP’s Twitter Archive
I’m starting at the end of this comment section.
[NOTE: Work very much “in progress”!]
I must be missing something. How could Shellenberger possibly know whether the laptop data held by the NY Post matched up to the laptop data held by the FBI? It sounds like Goldman allowed himself to get thrown off his own question, which was a valid one.
That’s without getting into the ways in which both could have been contaminated before, as EW and others have rightly pointed out.
A very good question indeed, because as far as I know Schellenberger is not part of any ‘need to know’ circle. I could be wrong about that.
He is a fringe alt-right journalist. If he has access to FBI investigative material, it’s news to me.
He is also a science denialist, notorious for making things up about climate change and practical mitigation strategies.
[Welcome to emptywheel. Please choose and use a unique username with a minimum of 8 letters. We are moving to a new minimum standard to support community security. Because your username is far too short and common (there are many Bill/Will/William in this community) it will be temporarily changed to match the date/time of your first known comment until you have a new compliant username. Thanks. /~Rayne]
Shellenberger has his logic backwards, not unusual, I suppose, for a colleague of Matt Taibbi. He’s the one who has to establish the genuineness of the laptop and/or its hard drive(s), in order to use them in his “journalism.” The conspiracy theory is that he needn’t do that, that he can just take their accuracy as fact until proven otherwise. That’s true whether the materials are used in civil/criminal court or in a headline.
For those interested in more discussion of the vagueness around Isaac’s turning over the laptop data to the FBI, how it was reported/document, etc, here is an Emptywheel post from 9/26/23:
https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/09/26/they-were-trying-to-boot-the-machine-john-paul-mac-isaac-claims-the-fbi-really-were-that-incompetent/
I was going to ask a few hours ago who at the FBI would order a review of this whole thing concerning the handling of the ‘laptop’ from the get go, and for that matter why haven’t they? Is it off limits now because of Weiss? Well nobody is better at CYA probably than the FBI.
I’m about halfway convinced that this whole series of posts is just Marcy’s attempt to get me to download that DDOS file and start working my way through it. And I’m almost there. That faked? email from 2020 is fascinating. Nothing about it makes any sense. It’s not remotely credible. Sure, Hunter Biden responded to an email from 2016 in 2020. Nor is it credible that someone deliberately faked the email to make it look like that’s what happened.
Sure, there were idiots involved in this caper. But who was the idiot who could and would accomplish this ridiculous fake? Rudolph “Mr. ButtDialer” Guiliani? Garrett “Peter Navarro’s Errand Boy” Ziegler? This is the equivalent of trying to pass off a letter from 1923 that refers to “World War I” instead of “the Great War”.
One thing I’m obsessed by — no one else is, AFAIK — is that there are automatic alerts, starting in 2017, about landscapers coming, set off a Google Calendar entry.
Alert – FYI landscapers at CBR (usually in AM)
They alternate between being sent FROM Google Calendar or FROM Hunter himself, and they don’t alternate in any way that makes sense to me.
Those are some of the most recent emails in Ziegler’s set (the same one DDOS has). So something someone did triggered those google alerts long after Hunter lost the laptop.
But one reason I’m especially obsessed with it is that Google alerts appear to be one of the things the IRS got from the laptop, instead of from Google itself.
https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/11/11/the-kinds-of-laptop-documents-the-hunter-biden-investigation-used/
Pretty sure there’s both a timing issue and an interoperability issue here wrt Google Calendar entries.
In 2018 Google changed how it notified non-Google Calendar users, which might explain some of the quirks but I don’t think it changes the disparity between FROM originators. Link below refers to Google Workspace, but IIRC this applied to more than that product.
https://workspaceupdates.googleblog.com/2018/10/non-google-calendar-users-receive-email-updates.html
Unfortunately I can’t find anything in my Gmail accounts to confirm this change because I deleted all emailed alerts related to Calendar events.
Wondering, though, if the product change affected how the notices appeared in email AND if syncing email through Apple iOS device may also have changed appearance. Not being an iOS user I can’t say.
Pretty sure those are the right questions to ask.
And all the anomalous stuff starts pre-2018. Same with the anomaly in my f-up on anomalies.
FWIW, I took the 10-digit numbers in the respective footer to a timestamp converter. Here’s the outcome:
Mail of 2016-09-21,Cc to “Joan Mayer”,
“date-received” = Wed Sep 02 2020 00:18:40 GMT+0000,
“date-last-viewed” = Tue Dec 07 2021 09:10:57 GMT+0000.
Mail of 2020-09-01, Cc to “Joan Peugh”,
“date-received” = Wed Sep 21 2016 11:56:43 GMT+0000, never viewed.
The hours for the respective time zone (plus 1 hour for DST in September) have to be subtracted.
Logically, it seems like the results should be flipped or just the opposite of what you learned. But maybe there is some other clue hidden in this data.
You’re right, it should be the other way around. I’m sorry for the mix-up.
Correction:
Mail of 2016-09-21,Cc to “Joan Mayer” — “date-received” = Wed Sep 21 2016 11:56:43 GMT+0000, never viewed.
Mail of 2020-09-01, Cc to “Joan Peugh” — “date-received” = Wed Sep 02 2020 00:18:40 GMT+0000,
“date-last-viewed” = Tue Dec 07 2021 09:10:57 GMT+0000.
I’m sorry for the mix-up. (That’s why I included the original footers, so that anybody could check.)
I was just wondering if the “last viewed” date of the most likely faked mail, 12/07/2021, may provide some additioneal clue.
Yeah, the 2021 date is Ziegler’s access, I think. A ton of the emails have last modified dates in 2021.
I think you got those backwards.
Yes, I’m sorry. See my reply to Savage Librarian. (Obviously it was a little bit too much of copying, text recognition, another copying, then combining the quotes with the results from the time stamp converter for the comment.)
Michael Shellenberger, Alex Epstein, Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, JD Vance and the rest of the tech bros crowd all seem to be on the same page with our adversaries to the point that it seems planned. Clinton Cash has evolved into more subtle books, articles, talking tours that have no counterpoint from the left.
TL connecting with
1] my comment above
2] The FORMER GUY’s PURLOINED PAPERS #TFGPP [listed by DATE] [**] = returned in June 2021
https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/06/14/trump-and-nautas-release-conditions/#comment-997540
3] TRUMP Twitter Archive https://www.thetrumparchive.com/
*******
3/28/18 The original ‘Macintosh HD’ drive was created.
8/XX/18 BANNON FIRST employed by Guo Wengui [digital media outlet G News]
3/17/19 Cutoff point of the data allegedly from the laptops. The LATEST date supposed to be present in the files.
4/12/19 Laptops allegedly dropped off for repair.
[“As early as”] 4/13/19 [Abbe LOWELL]: MAC ISAAC begins “accessing what he claims he had in his possession as Mr. Biden’s data”
4/25/19 BIDEN announces 2020 White House bid
MAY 2019 #TFGPP [These are the FIRST of 2019]:
5/XX/19 Late Alleged Hunter Biden emails are offered to people in Ukraine
7/25/19 TRUMP’s “perfect” [EXTORTION] call with President ZELENSKYY of UKRAINE
TRUMP:“I would like you to do us a favor, though.”
AUGUST 2019 #TFGPP:
8/XX/19 BANNON employed again by Guo Wengui [digital media outlet G News] as a senior editor
8/2719 This is the FIRST mention of Hunter Biden on TRUMP’s Twitter archive
[LINK in next comment]
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of HUNTER 8/27/19 – 9/28/19: https://www.thetrumparchive.com/?searchbox=%22hunter%22&dates=%5B%222019-08-25%22%2C%222019-09-29%22%5D&results=1 []
*******
9/XX/19 Mid A SECOND person in Ukraine is approached about alleged Hunter Biden emails. There is reportedly a plan to sell the data to allies of President Trump.
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter”:
9/24/19 PELOSI initiates abuse of power inquiry into TRUMP after a whistleblower alerts Congress
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter”:
9/28/19 FIRST [in TL] creation date of some of the PDF files used in the 10/14/20 NYP story
[FYI – #TFGPP – adding tag /~Rayne]
Can help think that Ken Vogel-NYT stenographic May 9, 2019 article — three days after that White House intel briefing — on behalf of Giuliani “announcing” his intended trip to Ukraine was a deliberate head’s up to Rudy’s contacts in Ukraine to let them know 1) I am on my way with goods; 2) key people are watching, make this happen – get Zelenskyy on board.
And then he had to cancel the trip…for later in May 2019? They had to change tactics and deploy Trump directly with the quid pro quo “perfect phone call” instead of Giuliani engaging Zelenskyy, but was [5/XX/19 Late Alleged Hunter Biden emails are offered to people in Ukraine] the handoff before the call?
We’ve still not seen a full unedited transcript of the “perfect call.” Can’t help wonder if Trump made mention of investigative materials exchanged between Team Trump and persons in Ukraine.
Nice work with TFG’s purloined papers, harpie! Thanks!
Thanks so much for that insight, Rayne! I’m looking forward to seeing how much correcting and filling-in the community may be able to do with this.
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of HUNTER 9/2819 – 11/1/19:
https://www.thetrumparchive.com/?searchbox=%22hunter%22&dates=%5B%222019-09-28%22%2C%222019-11-01%22%5D&results=1
*******
OCTOBER 2019 #TFGPP [There were NONE dated in SEPTEMBER]:
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter” [+ China] [10/1/19 – 10/6/19]:
10/8/19 Mac Isaac’s father meets with the FBI. The FBI advise Mac Isaac Sr. to get a lawyer and clarify the legal ownership of the laptop and his rights to it. Mac Isaac and his father interpret this instruction as a brush-off.
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter”:
10/10/19 Creation date of some of the PDF files used in the 10/14/20 NYP story
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter”:
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of HUNTER 10/31/19 – 1/1/20
https://www.thetrumparchive.com/?searchbox=%22hunter%22&dates=%5B%222019-10-31%22%2C%222020-01-01%22%5D&results=1 []
*******
NOVEMBER 2019 #TFGPP
11/7/19 BANNON speaks at the New York Young Republicans Club [NYYRC], where he meets Vish BURRA, one of the officers.
BANNON [invoking Napoleon]: “When you set out to take Vienna, take Vienna.”
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter” [+ some “China”] [11/7/19 – 11/24/19]
DECEMBER 2019 #TFGPP
12/XX/19 BURRA begins working for BANNON’s War Room podcast
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter” [+ some “China”]
12/9/19 FBI takes possession of laptop
12/9/19 When asked about meeting Giuliani, MAC ISAAC indicated he didn’t want to talk about the time between “December 9th [12/9/19] and the beginning of September.” [9/XX/20 early]
12/13/19 Hunter Biden investigators obtain “T26 SW [search warrant] signed by SA [redacted] for laptop and external hard drive”, and present “a filter protocol to the magistrate with the SW] [From details of handling of “Hunter Biden” “laptop”]
12/14/19 From DURHAM logistics guy, Will LEVI, to BARR: [12:47 PM] Laptop on way to you. // BARR [“Me”]: Super
12/18/19 The first TRUMP impeachment hearings BEGIN.
According to Giuliani, Mac Isaac gave the laptops’ data to COSTELLO “around this time”.
12/19/19 MAC ISAAC surrenders the laptops to the FBI.
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter” [+ some “China”]
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of HUNTER 1/1/20 – 3/1/20 https://www.thetrumparchive.com/?results=1&searchbox=%22hunter%22&dates=%5B%222019-12-31%22%2C%222020-03-01%22%5D
*******
JANUARY 2020 #TFGPP
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter”
1/25/20 BANNON launches “War Room: Pandemic” podcast; Vish BURRA works for BANNON on the War Room podcast for most of 2020
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter”
FEBRUARY 2020 #TFGPP
2/5/20 Impeachment ENDS with Senate vote to acquit TRUMP
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter”
2/18/20 Bernie KERIK pardon
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of HUNTER 3/1/20 – 7/16/20
https://www.thetrumparchive.com/?searchbox=%22hunter%22&dates=%5B%222020-03-01%22%2C%222020-06-30%22%5D&results=1
*******
MARCH 2020 #TFGPP
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter”
JUNE 2020 #TFGPP [The LAST month of DATED documents]
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter”
7/10/20 TRUMP commutes STONE’s sentence “days before he was to have reported to a federal prison in Georgia” [clemency]
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter”
8/XX/20 According to a court filing, MAC ISAAC contacts GIULIANI’s lawyer, COSTELLO
8/3/20 Eric HERSCHMANN begins work at WH as Senior Advisor to TRUMP [He remains until 1/20/21]
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of HUNTER 9/5/20 – 10/30/20
https://www.thetrumparchive.com/?searchbox=%22hunter%22&dates=%5B%222020-07-15%22%2C%222020-11-03%22%5D&results=1 []
*******
8/24/20 – 8/28/20 REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION
8/27/20 […] according to the text of an email Costello shared, one of Giuliani’s assistants forwarded a strange tip that had come in through the contact portal on the Giuliani Partners website:
8/31/20 Creation of two blank email replies to a 2014 email on the topic of a recommendation letter
9/1/20 Creation of two draft emails; they are added to the cache as a reply to an email from 2014
9/1/20 Creation of new folders on their copy of the laptop drive [WaPo]
9/2/20 Creation of more new folders on their copy of the laptop drive [WaPo]
9/2/20 Creation of a variation of a Burisma email from 2016; it is added to the cache. A phone number in the footer of the email is redacted and replaced with “Sent from my iPad”
9/XX/20 When Costello tells Snopes that he received the contents of the hard drive.
9/XX/20 Early When asked about meeting Giuliani, MAC ISAAC indicated he didn’t want to talk about the time between “December 9th [12/9/19] and the beginning of September.” [9/XX/20 early]
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter” + “If Biden wins, China wins”
9/8/20 TRUMP: [rally in NC]: “If Biden Wins, China Wins. It’s as Simple as That”
TRUMP Twitter Archive mentions of “Hunter” + “If Biden wins, China wins”
9/21/20 US based Chinese influencer / YouTuber, LUDE to his 200,000 subscribers: there are “three hard drives” that contain explosive materials about Hunter Biden
TRUMP on Twitter
9/25/20 […] Wang Dinggang—who at the time was a Guo ally with a YouTube channel called Lude Media that was featured on GTV—announced, falsely, that Chinese sources had sent US officials “three hard disks” of material related to Hunter Biden. That was the first public indication that Trump allies had obtained Hunter Biden’s private material. […]
9/28/20 A Twitter account linked to GUO and BANNON’s Himalaya movement amplifies an edited clip of the 9/25/20 Lude Media GTV segment, adding:
9/29/20 First presidential debate
TRUMP: “Proud Boys, Stand back and stand by”
TRUMP on Twitter
[I won’t be adding as many TRUMP TWEETS because there are just TOO many!]
10/XX/20 [early] [McLEAN, VA meeting] Trump Had One Last Story to Sell. The Wall Street Journal Wouldn’t Buy It. Inside the White House’s secret, last-ditch effort to change the narrative, and the election — and the return of the media gatekeepers. [NYT]
Lots of TWEETS
10/10/20 GUO, GIULIANI, and BANNON meet for dinner in Guo’s Manhattan apartment. Pictures posted by a since-suspended Twitter account supportive of Guo showed Guo and Giuliani embracing and smoking cigars.
10/XX/20 Addition of three more directories; someone from a West Coast location [Nunes?] may have accessed the copy of the drive that WaPo later analyzed.
10/XX/20 GIULIANI and BANNON reportedly give data to NYP
10/14/20 NYP publishes: Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad
TRUMP Tweets:
10/19/20 [MCLEAN, Va meeting, cont’d from: 10/XX/20 [early] [McLEAN, VA meeting]
10/19/20 TRUMP, on call with NYT staff, tells them [WSJ is] “working on an important piece.”
TRUMP Tweets:
10/21/20 7:35 PM BOBULINSKI emails an on-the-record, 684-word statement detailing his allegations that the former vice president had involvement in his son’s [Hunter] business dealings, to a range of news outlets. Breitbart News published it in full. NYT: [BANNON: “[BOBULINSKI] got spooked about whether [the WSJ] were going to do it or not”]
10/22/20 Final Presidential DEBATE
TRUMP Tweets:
10/31/20 BANNON advises CHINESE [-American?] media group re: election night coverage.
11/3/20 [ELECTION DAY] Creation of two blank emails which are inserted with no recipient, subject or body
TRUMP Tweets:
12/XX/20 The latest date on the emails found by cyber-forensics firm Maryman & Associates, who provide an analysis to the Daily Mail.
12/11/20 BANNON HIRES [“Pardon Broker and GIULIANI lawyer” < ew] COSTELLO
12/11/20 TRUMP raises the prospect of firing BARR at WH meeting
TRUMP Tweets
12/14/20 TRUMP announces BARR’s resignation by tweet
12/15/20 BARR announces his resignation, effective 12/23/21
TRUMP Tweets: