Dear DNC: Automotive “I Told You Sos” Need to Be Directed Down-Ticket, Too

The DNC and Midwestern state Democratic Parties are rolling out an extravaganza today, using the occasion of Chrysler paying back some of its federal loans to mock GOP presidential candidates for opposing the auto bailout.

The DNC had a press conference with Jennifer Granholm, Ted Strickland, and Bob King to mock people like Mitt, T-Paw, Gingrich, and Huntsman. “Many of these naysayers now want to be President,” Strickland said.

MI posted a release (though apparently didn’t care enough send it to members):

Chrysler is reportedly set to announce that it will repay $5.9 billion in loans to the U.S. government and American taxpayers. Chrysler’s good news comes on the heels of a report that Chrysler made its first quarterly profit since emerging from structured bankruptcy reorganization.  Chrysler posted a 22.5% increase of sales in April compared to the same month last year and first quarter net income of $116 million, marking a remarkable turnaround for Chrysler and the domestic auto industry.“This is a great sign for Chrysler communities across the state and another positive sign of the recovery of manufacturing here in Michigan,” said Michigan Democratic Party Chair Mark Brewer. “Though it was unpopular in many parts of the country, President Obama and Democrats did what was needed to save the more than 1.4 million jobs that the American auto industry supports. If the President hadn’t acted to prevent Chrysler and GM from shutting their doors permanently, the entire state could have seen further economic disaster.”

After receiving loan packages and emerging from structured bankruptcy reorganization, Chrysler and General Motors are both hiring again and operating at a profit. Right here in Michigan, more than 12,100 manufacturing and auto dealer jobs have been created in the last year.

IN posted a release and sent it to DFH journalists from adjoining states:

In response to today’s news that Chrysler has repaid $5.9 billion in loans to the U.S. government and American taxpayers, Indiana Democratic Party Chair lauded President Obama for his strong economic leadership and success taking action to prevent the collapse of America’s domestic auto industry.Parker also said Indiana Republicans who voted against or publicly opposed Obama’s auto plan now find themselves on the wrong side of history.

“Indiana’s auto industry was hard hit by the recent economic crisis, and this is a great sign both for Chrysler and Hoosier workers,” Parker said. “President Obama’s plan wasn’t popular in many parts of the country, but Democrats did what was necessary to save the more than 1.4 million jobs that the American auto industry supports. Without that kind of strong leadership, many of our communities would have suffered economic disaster.”

Chrysler’s good news comes on the heels of a report that the company made its first quarterly profit since emerging from structured bankruptcy reorganization. Chrysler posted a 22.5% increase of sales in April compared to the same month last year and first quarter net income of $116 million, marking a remarkable turnaround for Chrysler and the domestic auto industry.

After receiving loan packages and emerging from structured bankruptcy reorganization, Chrysler and General Motors are both hiring again and operating at a profit.

Parker noted that Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and U.S. Rep Mike Pence, who is seeking the Republican gubernatorial nomination, both opposed the President’s auto plan.

(I haven’t seen one from OH yet, but they sent this wonderfully catty release earlier this month.)

Update: Here’s Obama’s statement (which lacks any “I told you sos”):

Chrysler’s repayment of its outstanding loans to the U.S. Treasury and American taxpayers marks a significant milestone for the turnaround of Chrysler and the countless communities and families who rely on the American auto industry. This announcement comes six years ahead of schedule and just two years after emerging from bankruptcy, allowing Chrysler to build on its progress and continue to grow as the economy recovers. Supporting the American auto industry required making some tough decisions, but I was not willing to walk away from the workers at Chrysler and the communities that rely on this iconic American company. I said if Chrysler and all its stakeholders were willing to take the difficult steps necessary to become more competitive, America would stand by them, and we did. While there is more work to be done, we are starting to see stronger sales, additional shifts at plants and signs of strength in the auto industry and our economy, a true testament to the resolve and determination of American workers across the nation.

But there’s something missing, perhaps because the DNC is too focused on national races and doesn’t appear to know much about the local industry. The DNC is focused on the GM and Chrysler headlines, not so much the suppliers, where the bulk of the jobs are. More importantly, the Democrats as a whole don’t seem to be cataloging the many examples where down-ticket Republicans are claiming credit for government investments in new technology that are just now paying off in jobs.

The problem is particularly acute here in W MI, home of some of the GOP’s biggest evangelists claiming business simply needs government to get out of the way. But it’s also home to a good number of factories–including, increasingly, clean energy factories supported by Granholm credits and federal stimulus dollars–that rely on government funding.

As Wizardkitten ranted wonderfully earlier this months, GOPers routinely show up to claim credit for these plants, even while ignoring that Democratic investments rather than GOP austerity made the plants possible.

Governor Snyder, who spent a campaign trash-talking both the state economic development team and the tax credits that are now growing a clean energy economy here in Michigan, not only used an advanced battery plant created with state incentives and stimulus money to introduce the Republican ticket last August, now has given his “Reinventing Michigan” award to another Governor Granholm/MEDC/Recovery Act success story – and tries to play it off as a victory surrounding his political talking points.

[snip]

Pete Hoekstra also tried to turn Energetx into a political football during his failed 2010 gubernatorial campaign, at the time holding a press conference to both celebrate the jobs and denounce the credits that brought them here – a move that forced CEO Slikkers to defend the company and the state economic development team. Awkward.

Now, Snyder has given them a shiny award, and uses the occasion to push his simplistic trickle-down plan that probably would have had the company looking at Indiana or some other state for incentives in the first place. The hubris is amazing.

Both at a national and a regional level, it seems to me, these are the jobs the DNC ought to be bragging about. Nationally, few people understand how stimulus dollars invested in new technology that should help the Big 2.5 compete in the near future. I hear a lot of people badmouthing the auto bailout because they don’t understand how significant a shift GM, at least, has made on efficiency; but this cool new tech ought to make folks on the coasts happier about the money spent.

And pointing to these factories at a regional level would highlight the good, new news. Michiganders, for one, are acutely aware that MI needed new technology, and Granholm worked her ass off to attract it. That effort is just now coming to fruition.

More importantly, we’re waging an ideological battle here in the Midwest, as a bunch of GOP hacks try to restructure the Midwest with policies that will strip the region of the things we do well (in many cases, like educating our children). The national party might like to keep it a secret that government investment actually works, particularly in new industries. But if it keeps that story a secret, we’re going to lose the ideological battle for the Midwest.

image_print
  1. rugger9 says:

    Maybe the DNC figures osmosis will do it, though I thought Wasserman-Schultz was more astute than this. I know Howard Dean would go with all guns blazing.

    If the local candidates pick up the ball, it will work out.

    • emptywheel says:

      Problem with that is that for many of these places, a local Dem isn’t going to have the same institutional reach as a GOPer.

      You have to be a marginally viable candidate to start shaming an opponent for claiming credit for things you really opposed, particularly as local media covers less and less.

      • rugger9 says:

        Understood, but that isn’t any reason why the DNC shouldn’t have the ads ready to go. And to forward the $$$ to run them.

  2. bobschacht says:

    EW,
    Thanks for continuing to keep us informed about the auto industry.

    This sentence looks like you didn’t finish your thought:

    …even while ignoring that Democratic investments rather than GOP austerity

    Bob in AZ

  3. AstralTechnician says:

    There was never a commitment to continue the 50 state strategy post Dean. Now that entire infrastructure has to be rebuilt, and there ain’t many people out there who can fill his shoes.

  4. rugger9 says:

    The thing about the 50 state strategy (widely pooh-poohed by the beltway Ds a the time) was that it enabled the D’s to pick up seats in 2006 and 2008 that unpredictably came on the radar because of GOP stupidity in office. In business, you never know which customers are going to pop, which is why slavish devotion to top-five management isn’t a good idea [it’s a holding pat strategy that never grows]. But top-five or beltway “wisdom” is easier to do, leaving more time for the cocktail weenie circuit, the golf course, or in Boehner’s case, the 19th hole/tanning salon

  5. EternalVigilance says:

    One big reason this isn’t made a bigger deal is this isn’t the kind of thing into which the crowing Obama wants people to look too closely.

    From today’s news at Bloomberg:

    “The Treasury said today it isn’t likely to recover its remaining $1.9 billion investment in Chrysler.”

    So betting $10B of the public’s money and losing nearly $2B is what counts as a remarkable Obama/DNC success story?

    And just how did Chrysler come up with the money to “pay off” these loans? Was it a profit from running its business better, or a sign of an improving American economy? Of course not. It just took out other loans!

    From Forbes:

    “To pay off the governments, Chrysler raised $3.2 billion through a bond sale and took out $3 billion in lower-interest bank loans. It also will use a $1.3 billion investment from Fiat.”

    Except of course that Fiat has to borrow the money, too:

    “Fiat Said to Target $2 Billion Loan After Chrysler Stake Buy”

    This is good news the same way doing a balance transfer on maxed-out credit cards is a sign of good financial health.

    Finally, given the Fed is still handing out free (read: your) money for banks to then loan back to the suckers at interest, any guesses as to where all this “new” loan money eventually comes from?

    This event is definitely a big “I Told You So,” but probably not in the way most would like.

  6. tflorio says:

    By our good fortune, Mike Rogers is the Rep. in my part of Mich. so anything good that happens is the result of the WWOT (don’t worry about the details). Just because we are a bedroom community in Southeastern Mich doesn’t mean that our livelihoods are in any way associated with Obama”s push for the auto industry.

  7. liberalarts says:

    My impression is that since the 2008 election, the DNC has been completely subsumed by Obama. Obama is about Obama. He isn’t really a committed part of any party, so any efforts will be for his re-election and nothing else. The Dem party made a terrible mistake with him. They should have retained their character and independence, but they gave it away for the illusion of ascendancy. Now they’re just shabby doormats.

    • tammanytiger says:

      We saw the same movie under Clinton, only with less flashy special effects. It was all about the Big Dog, and state and local Democratic parties slowly died. Howard Dean reversed some of the rot, only to be shown the door by the party mandarins–most of whom are alumni of the Clinton era.

  8. tammanytiger says:

    In 2010, the Michigan Democratic Party laid down and played dead, allowing the GOP to take all statewide offices on the ballot, take back a Supreme Court seat, recapture the State House, roll up an overwhelming majority in the Senate.

    Mark Brewer, the MDP Chairman for Life, reacted to the debacle by elbowing all would-be challengers out of the race and doing absolutely nothing to change the party’s failed business model. His leadership makes the regime at General Motors in 2008 look brilliant.