DOJ Anthrax Report Working Thread
DOJ has posted its Anthrax Report and related documents.
The Justice Department, FBI and U.S. Postal Inspection Service today announced that the investigation into the 2001 anthrax attacks, which killed five individuals and sickened 17 others, has formally concluded.
Earlier today, representatives of the FBI and Justice Department provided a 92-page investigative summary along with attachments to victims of the attacks, relatives of the victims and appropriate committees of Congress. This document sets forth a summary of the evidence developed in the “Amerithrax” investigation, the largest investigation into a bio-weapons attack in U.S. history. As disclosed previously, the Amerithrax investigation found that the late Dr. Bruce Ivins acted alone in planning and executing these attacks.
The investigative summary and the attachments are now accessible to the public and have been posted to the Justice Department Web site at www.usdoj.gov/amerithrax under the Freedom of Information Act. In addition, roughly 2,700 pages of FBI documents related to the Amerithrax case are now accessible to the public and have been posted to the FBI website at http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/amerithrax.htm under the Freedom of Information Act.
The Amerithrax Task Force, which was comprised of roughly 25 to 30 full-time investigators from the FBI, U.S. Postal Inspection Service and other law enforcement agencies, as well as federal prosecutors from the District of Columbia and the Justice Department’s Counterterrorism Section, expended hundreds of thousands of investigator work hours on this case. Their investigative efforts involved more than 10,000 witness interviews on six different continents, the execution of 80 searches and the recovery of more than 6,000 items of potential evidence during the course of the investigation. The case involved the issuance of more than 5,750 grand jury subpoenas and the collection of 5,730 environmental samples from 60 site locations.
Use this as a working thread.
Update: Ah jeebus. Here’s half of what they say about Hatfill:
B. The Elimination of Dr. Steven J. Hatfill as a Suspect
In August 2002, it became widely known that Dr. Steven J. Hatfill was a person of interest to the Task Force. Early in the investigation, numerous individuals who suspected that he might be involved in the letter attacks contacted the FBI. While working as a researcher at USAMRIID from 1997 to 1999, Dr. Hatfill had virtually unrestricted access to the Ames strain of anthrax, the same strain used in the 2001 mailings. Dr. Hatfill also appeared to know the intricacies of conducting a successful anthrax dissemination by mail, although it was not uncommon for those in the bio-defense community to develop such scenarios for training exercises. In addition, he had filled multiple prescriptions for the antibiotic Cipro® in 2001, which was the only drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of inhalational anthrax; however, its use also was consistent with treatment for a persistent infection from which Dr. Hatfill was suffering at the time.
Ultimately, the FBI’s genetic analysis of the organism used in the attacks led investigators to exclude him conclusively as a suspect. Early in the investigation, it was assumed that isolates of the Ames strain were accessible to any individual at USAMRIID with access to the biocontainment labs. Later in the investigation, when scientific breakthroughs led investigators to conclude that RMR-1029 was the parent material to the anthrax powder used in the mailings, it was determined that Dr. Hatfill could not have been the mailer because he never had access to the particular bio-containment suites at USAMRIID that held the RMR-1029. In other words, although Dr. Hatfill had access to Ames strain anthrax while at USAMRIID, he never had access to the particular spore-batch used in the mailings.
No apologies, not excuses in this.
Update: I’d love to see this explained in more detail–particularly how leaks tying this to Iraq got to the press.
For example, Task Force agents vigorously pursued the possibility that the letters were the result of a state-sponsored attack, and specifically focused on those governments known to have, or have had, an offensive biological weapons program.
Short of explaining the leaks, you’ve not dismissed possible other motives.
Update: On victimology:
A victimology assessment revealed few themes of commonality among the targeted victims. Three of the five known targeted victims were media/press entities: Tom Brokaw/NBC, the New York Post, and the National Enquirer/AMI. The remaining two targeted victims were United States Senators. Senators Daschle and Leahy and Tom Brokaw all were middle-aged white males who held positions of leadership in their respective fields at the time of the attacks.
That’s it?!?!?! That’s the best they can do with this crowd? And no mention of the fake attack to Judy Miller, which–it seems to me–might be as much a clue to motive as anything else.
Ah well, I guess that has been disappeared down the memory hole.
Update: How much is 220 ml?
According to this review, there was approximately 220 ml of RMR-1029 that was unaccounted for on Dr. Ivins’s Reference Material Receipt record prior to the mailings in 2001.
Update: This is kind of a weird throwaway:
However, within a few months of the anthrax attacks, the FDA fast-tracked the approval process and approved the Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (“AVA”), even though it didn’t meet the original potency standards. This was a significant development for the anthrax researchers.
It would seem to take away from their explanation for motive. But it also obscures the whole political pressure driving this, coming straight from the top.
It’s nice to see so much skepticism in these comments (in the previous thread…). Sure looks like it was another false flag. And they think they can put it to bed this way?
They can, IF Leahy goes along with it.
Boxturtle (No comment from Leahy’s office yet)
Link I found was there, for today*s document.
I wonder what Hatfill is doing these days – since he is no longer the suspect. The FBI seemed so sure at one point. I also wonder whether all the strains in the letters match: Letter one to Congress, letter 2 to Congress, letter to Judy Miller, the stuff that killed the guy working for the National Enquirer, the letters mailed to the news media, other assorted individuals who died or who came into contact with the anthrax.
What a pile of crap the report appears to be. Jeebus.
Damn that DOJ. They dare come out with this piece of crap on Gator Baseball opening night? Okay,one more errand and then I can read for a couple of hours, but these guys really should check their scheduling with me.
After all, I was so effective in getting them to release the OPR report on Yoo and Bradbury so quickly. Any day now…
Actually, that may actually be forthcoming…
And the nifty thing about this bogus report is it makes Ivins’ belief in conspiracies and puzzles a key to their explanation. Sort of turning this into conspiracy squared.
They still don’t explain how he mailed this in Princeton while he was in MD…
In inquisitions to come the very need for such explanations will be considered prima facie evidence of virulently contagious retrograde conspiratorialism.
“Magic Bullet” train … express?
It is hard to keep track of these things.
MD (something magic happens) NJ.
(Bet you notice anachronisms and other screwups in movies, too doncha? Geez you are a hard sell, EW, they spent hours working on this …)
DW
ya see, in-between preparing batches of anthrax he perfected the cloning process, cloned himself, then borrowed the invisibility cloak & a pinch of Floo Powder from Harry Potter and presto! A Princeton postmark.
(what? think the FBI’s got anything better?)
You do realize, of course, that part of the evidence against Ivins is a poem he emailed to a friend expressing a feeling that there was a second dream-Bruce holed up in him. See p.46 (pdf 50):
So maybe Ivins was troubled — as are a lot of people who did not do the letters. Still not enough that separates him from that group.
I read this with the key word being “explain” and meaning the event in this particular case.
But then, there is a lot that is not explained. Like why there are no documents going back to 2001 in the FOIA dump. If it’s closed, shouldn’t the initial reports from the crime scenes be available under FOIA? How about the chain of custody from the crime scene to USAMRIID?
I can’t wait to read the bit about thier investigation of why the Whitehouse staff started taking cipro before the attacks. Was the Senate advised?
Nothing about the anthrax at the news bureaus in Florida?
Warren Commission redux. “Thousands of hours, thousands of agents, thousands of documents…”
Bad stink that’ll last for decades.
You can almost hear the words of the guy running the investigation:
“Whatever we do, we sure don’t want the truth to come out on this. That’s the most important thing. We must falsify everything that leads to the truth, no matter what. Uh, it’s a national security issue, you know.”
Here is an obvious, but subtle, problem with the the theory that Ivins was the perp. From pg. 13 (pdf pg. 17):
[My bold]
Later, in footnote 19 (pg. 32/pdf pg. 36)
If the “trash marks” (i.e. all those little splotches and hair marks you see on your copies) from that copier had matched or been consistent in any way, they would have mentioned that.
Besides — as if any perp with the mojo to do the deed wouldn’t also be smart enough not to use the lab’s copier. Sheesh.
Yeah, when I read the later bit, I couldn’t help but wonder if they were trying to tie the library in with no proof.
From interview on 3/28/2003 (PDF)
“Improper packaging initially…” Does this mean FBI or early work at USAMRIID?
Okay, I’ve read the genetic analysis section of the summary, and some questions that I have had about their genetic analysis now are answered, along with more detail about how the infamous RMR 1029 flask was prepared.
RMR 1029 is composed of a mixture of material that was grown in fermenters at Dugway and in smaller flasks by Ivins and a technician in their lab. Ivins was given partially purified spores from Dugway. He further purified those spores and combined them with spores he produced. The combined material is a genetic mixture, with most of the population apparently identical to the original Ames isolate, but with small populations of bacteria that are otherwise identical but with one of four different single mutations. What’s missing from the description of the genetic analysis is an indication of the relative frequencies of the “wildtype” bacteria and each of the mutations.
The FBI managed to get samples of every known laboratory sample of anthrax known to be derived from the original Ames isolate. Out of over 1000 samples analyzed, only 8 showed all four of the mutations found to be in RMR 1029. Missing again is any information about relative frequencies of the populations. All eight positive samples were “derived from RMR 1029”. But the FBI admits that Ivins kept records of transferring samples of RMR 1029 (pages 27-28 of summary):
All that the FBI has proven is that the bacteria used in the attacks and the bacteria in RMR 1029 and samples derived from it, have present within them both the wildtype Ames genotype and four relatively rare mutations. This does not prove that material from flask RMR 1029 directly is what was mailed in the attacks. Material Ivins transferred to any of the other labs could have been used to produce new cultures from which the attack material derived. Considerable expertise would have been required to produce material of the concentration and cleanliness in both RMR 1029 and the Leahy attack material especially, but it can be presumed that all personnel Ivins transferred material to would have that expertise.
The FBI has done nothing but possibly narrow the field of suspects somewhat. Closing the case is not justified on the basis of the science they have reported.
I note also that in their photo of RMR 1029 it looks as though the flask is now essentially empty. I wonder how much material was in it when the FBI took possession and what has been done with that material.
Note in editing: The reason relative populations are important is that they could reveal whether subculturing has occurred. If RMR 1029 is used directly to start a new culture, the populations of the various mutants should be similar, although they could shift with repeated subculturing. New cultures started from single bacterial colonies derived from a “spread plate” of the culture would be expected to have a single, rather than mixed population. Most microbiologists start new cultures in this way unless they are working from what they consider to be a “master culture”. I would presume that RMR 1029 would have been seen by Ivins’ collaborators as just such a thing (and would have saved a step in handling of a dangerous microbe).
Thank you, thank you! Diary soon? Even just repeating what you’ve written here.
Of course, what Jim White has pointed out is a case of the elevation of circumstantial evidence, which is how the whole thing reads to me, although from some of the circumstances one could see Ivins being a “person of interest” at least until more definitive info (like his apparent need to be into two places at once to pull the job off) surfaced. I wonder what is the FBI’s record on closing non-presidential assassination level cases where all they have is a pile of circumstance. Maybe leaving aside some case where the necessary evidence has clearly been destroyed, if there is such.
If you read their process for eliminating other suspects, you’ll find that they apparently never consider that more than one person could have been involved. Lots of folks with access to RMR-1029 were ignored because they didn’t have the requisite skills. Virtually all of them knew people with the proper equipment and technique.
Although they claim that expertise is required for purifying spores, any good scientist can reason their way there. Spores have evolved to persist for extended periods in tough conditions. That means that other biological material can be removed through very straightforward treatments to destroy everything except the spores. Spores of another bacterium I used to work with were purified by using ultrasonic treatment to disrupt everything else. The spores were fine and could be concentrated easily after that.
And now I’m off to baseball. Brr.
May the Gators and Sun Devils meet in the CWS!
If they do, the first beer in Omaha is on me.
And to those who’ve asked, I’ll try to put together a more detailed diary tomorrow.
Or could have passed the material via a contact to others with such skills.
THanks for that. I was hoping you’re working on a more extensive Seminal Diary on this…
I’m suspicious- verry suspicious.
Are contractors involved in this?
I’m specifically wondering about Exponent Inc.
Who brought them in and when?
A little over seven fluid ounces (a cup is 240ml, very nearly).
Thanks. Elsewhere they say–based on one supposition–that 500 ML would have been needed for the letters. So if that’s true, it’s not enough to have “disappeared” to fill the letters with.
Btw, the OPR report is trickling out. I don’t have a copy in hand yet, but should have something in the next hour.
Has anyone seen the stuff on codes supposedly embedded in the letters, pp. 60-64?
Staggeringly, unbelievably stupid stuff there.
Is there a twitter hashtag for the anthrax investigation?
and bless you all for working so hard to really solve the case.
And, in further news from the Whistling land of important, Americans Bodacious Bode Miller and Andrew Weibrecht have taken the Silver and Bronze in Mens Super-G.
I will mutter this quietly to myswelf again — how did Ivins manage to make the quality of preparation that was distributed using the conventional lyophilizer available to him? ‘Cause that’s right up there with magic. And the *known* technique (missing the link; my bookmarks got erased somehow) to make that quality prep is very fancy, very weaponized, and not something you do in your spare time in the lab.
So what will the feds say when the Anthrax Attacker sends another letter with the same strain tucked inside?
I don’t know that we will see that until there is a cut in the funding for USAMRIID.
Hofstadter plays down link between his writing and the codes:
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/scienfcefair/post/2010/02/gödel-escher-bach-author-downplays-fbi-anthrax-case-link/1
Anthrax myth persists despite evidence
Worth a read.
I read the entire report as a skeptic and while I am not entirely sure that there may not be some kind of cover-up vis-a-vis what kind of work was going on at that lab I do find the fbi’s conclusions as to the culprit in the case to be very convincing.
That is a pitiful and shallow story by USA Today that does nothing whatsoever to address the real questions on the Anthrax case. Go up to the search box in the upper right corner of this page and search “anthrax”, which will give a list of all the anthrax posts here. Read those and tell me you are convinced.
It is very encouraging to know that this CSI-EW crew is on the job, defending democracy and rule of law.
Smart, good, and brave. Blessed combo.
Actually, Warren Commission reredux. The 9/11 Commission was the Warren Commission redux.
For an understanding of what the atmosphere was like at Fort Detrick all the way back in the 1950’s, read H.P. Albarelli’s A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA’s Secret Cold War Experiments.
Already back then, the U.S. government was willing to commit murder to prevent the truth from coming out about its misdeeds.
Let us not forget the amazing Ms. Duley, who accompanied by the FBI filed a restraining order against Ivins, basically the only “evidence” of Ivins’ homicidal behavior, and then disappeared. She is gone. Nowhere to be found. Gone, baby, gone.
Any cite on the disappearance, please?