PATRIOTs and Secrets Hearing, Day One Wrap Up

graphic: Dr John 2005 via Flickr

graphic: Dr John 2005 via Flickr

A quick overview of Wednesday’s doings in House Judiciary Committee’s mark-up of the PATRIOT Act renewal.

The hearing started with John Conyers introducing a managers amendment to the bill that made tweaks to the overal bill to move them slightly closer to what the Obama Administration wanted. Republicans tried to gut National Security Letters (NSLs). One of those pertained to the changes in NSL minimization.

Republicans tried to eliminate special protections for library records, expand NSLs, and eliminate any minimization on NSL information. On all three, those amendments went down on a party line vote. Nadler did a particularly good job at defending the logic of the underlying bill, particularly the standards of proof the government must have to conduct certain kinds of searches.

Then, Adam Schiff (as I had predicted) piped up to make one of the changes the Administration wanted. He switched the 215 standard to what the Senate Judiciary Committee has adopted (showing the reasons to believe that records are relevant to an authorized investigation), but then required the Administration to come up with a better way to collect this information. Whereas in the Senate, that effort won bipartisan support, here it was strictly party line vote (though it seemed like Maxine Waters considered voting against it from the left).

The highlight of the hearing, though, was a speech that Mel Watt made. He talked about how, in the days after 9/11, he thought, “Well, if AG Ashcroft is protecting me from terrorists, who’s protecting me from AG Ashcroft?” He went on to bemoan the fact that there was no one like Bob Barr left on the Republican side. “I long for the day that somebody on your side of the aisle and remember that it was you that stood for individual rights at one point in your party’s history.”

All things considered, this is currently a better bill than the Senate side–though still one that allows for data mining of Americans. They’re coming back tomorrow, though, so we have not yet succeeded in improving on the SJC bill.

[Ed. note: The House Judiciary Committee is expected to reconvene Thursday at 11:00 a.m. EST; watch for more coverage here at emptywheel.]

image_print
27 replies
  1. MadDog says:

    Late to the party, so thanks EW for the excellent posts on the Patriot act hearings!

    Couple typos: Post title has “PATRTIOTs” and should be “PATRIOTs”, and then “He want on to bemoan” should be “He went on to bemoan”.

    • MadDog says:

      I would note that the Bush memo (3 page PDF) which we’ve seen the body of before, has a Director of Central Intelligence routing slip that has some “curious” instructions.

      You’ll note that the Routing slip has columns for Action and Info. All of the CIA addressees only have check boxes marked in the Info column.

      Since Bush’s memo is all about how he wants “…detainees be treated humanely and, to the extent appropriate and consistent with military necessity, in a manner consistent with the principles of Geneva…”, and since the CIA is the primary organization tasked with detainee torture interrogation, the lack of check boxes marked in the Action column for the CIA takes on a telling meaning.

  2. chetnolian says:

    More OT. Today an Italian court convicted, in their absence, several members of the CIA including the Milan Station Chief of kidnapping a cleric called Abu Omar off a Milan street and performing extraordinary rendition on him to Egypt in 2003. Needless to say the Egyptians then tortured him. First crack in the dam perhaps? The first of many Americans who will have to give up foreign travel?

  3. demi says:

    I’m not understanding this sentence:
    “I long for the day that somebody on your side of the aisle and remember that it was you that stood for individual rights at one point in your party’s history.”
    He longs for the day that somebody What?

    • bobschacht says:

      He was longing for the days when there were Republicans of principle across the aisle, like Bob Barr, who actually believed in the Constitution and defended it, regardless of what the Republican Party Line was at the time.

      Bob in AZ

  4. perris says:

    speaking of patriots, fox knew the yankees would be doing “god bless America” of the seventh inning stretch, they do it every game

    I’m told the rendition was one of the most moving performances ever

    fox did NOT broadcast that performance even though they knew it would be happening, I even suspect she practiced before the game

    imagine how the fox nutz would be going balistic if msn didn’t broadcast that performance

    I don’t think there’s a tube up yet but I hope they get one up soon

    sounds like a good post for someone, I’m at work and can’t do a diary today

  5. SouthernDragon says:

    Aw, mods, now yer gonna have people thinkin’ I’m crazy. At least put up a note or sumthin’ where the deleted comment was. *g* Or delete this and my earlier comment. Sheesh.

    [mod note: It was there, and now it’s gone.]

  6. robspierre says:

    The guy in the graphic should be a Red Coat. Red Coats (and Xe-provided Hessians) are the new Patriots. Long live King George.

Comments are closed.