Rove Has a Date with HJC–He Just Doesn’t Want to Tell Fox News That
As I noted earlier, Fox reported yesterday that Miers had testified before HJC, but there was not yet an agreement to have Rove testify.
But that’s not right. According to a status report filed in the HJC suit against the White House over ten days ago, Rove has a date to appear.
Pursuant to the Court’s order dated March 5, 2009, the parties respectfully submit this joint status report.
Since the last status report, the parties have made substantial progress towards fulfilling their obligations under the Agreement Concerning Accommodation. The Committee has now been provided access to all of the documents covered by the Agreement, and the parties have agreed to a schedule for interviews with Harriet Miers and Karl Rove, to take place under the agreed terms and conditions.
Miers, Rove, and the documents!?!?! What a novelty. Oversight–just two years in the making.
Might be a good time to review that whole concept of ‘false witness’, as K-k-k-karl seems to think if it’s plausibly deniable, he can’t be held accountable. And he also seems to think that if something is ‘credible’ or ‘believable’ that makes it somehow ‘true’.
He’s always been confused that way.
He’s such a proponent of Truthiness that he seems incapable of discerning what is accurate, what is real, what is factual.
Here’s hoping that sniveling little morally myopic creep provides Truthiness testimony that will somehow produce a very long prison sentence for his sleazy, unethical, opportunistic ass.
Not that I have any notions about the matter… /s
Thanks Marcy, I was sure that he was obligated to appear. IIRC, this will be similar to Harriet’s appearance in that the Prosecutor(s) get as long as they want, to question Rove.
Will their testimony ever be known to us or will it remain a secret ?
No, transcripts are to be released after HJC is done and both sides get to review the transcript.
both folks in government and folks on the outside?
Will Manny Acta, Washington Nats manager, be fired before Rove testifies?
Yes
I don’t think “the parties have agreed to a schedule for interviews” means a date and time have been set. I think it means the order has been agreed upon. For instance Miers will appear first, and then after x, y, and z, Rove will appear. All Rove has to do is not have x, y, or z done.
Unfortunately–even after he does testify, I doubt he’ll see any jail time. I’m no lawyer, but considering Obama’s track record and his zest for echoing Bush’s policies….”finish this sentence as you see fit”
It’s not up to Obama, he is the President not a King. It is up to you and what you organize and commit yourself to do.
All hail Petrocelli.
-G
LOL … GregB !
I just saw Valley Girl on a prior thread …
Thank you for pointing that out. Now I’m certain he wouldn’t pull any strings in the Judicial committee to get his own/bush agenda passed.
The Bush Agenda is so yesteryear…we hope??!!
Hundreds of thousands, dead, injured and 5 million Iraqi refugees left in their bloody fucking tracks. And in the process hundreds tortured, killed, raped…if we lived in a just world those murderers would no longer be walking the streets let alone filling our air waves with their poisonous words and thoughts.
You are right, and I apologize for making light of it. We will be feeling the adverse effects of the Bush Agenda for decades to come, as will the rest of the world.
Cheney should be in jail, along with the rest of ‘em…fingers crossed!!
“what a novelty” how long could a peasant ignore a congressional subpoena without having their ass thrown in prison?
2 years and counting
Rove and “the documents,” but alas no e-mails from the gwb43.com domain.
Why hasn’t anyone tried to pry those e-mails out of the RNC’s hands? Michael Steele seems like he’s trying to prove himself…
What about a challenge to release those e-mails? I don’t believe that they’ve been declared “permanently lost” , have they?
While CREW is suing to get the WH visitor logs
http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/…..vice-logs/
the WH is refusing to say whether Obama will issue an EO to prevent the release of those photos
http://rawstory.com/08/news/20…..se-photos/
Likely unrelated, but just for the timeline, I think it’s worth pointing out federal prosecutors are zeroing in on John Conyers’ wife in their Detroit City Council bribery probe.
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs…..e=printart
Oh, no.
Oh yes
Monica Conyers is not the model of balance and good government.
Sigh. Thnx.
I’m a little under a year too late, but I’m kinda sorry I missed bidding on this auction item at the Texas Park and Wildlife Foundation’s 2008 Live Auction:
Quail hunting with Karl, at the scene of Cheney’s crime… Wow!
Karl is on the board of that organization.
My, that does leave the field open, doesn’t it?;>
OT – interesting interview with Peter Jan Honigsberg who has a new book out ( Our Nation Unhinged ) about the GWOT and “enemy combatants” types of language manipulation.
As I was checking in on GITMO info I found that Candace Gorman’s Guatanamo Blog linked on Sat to a couple of EW posts:
http://gtmoblog.blogspot.com/2…..rture.html
Just an aside, but do you see a connection between Rove finally talking and this: Seligman Prosecutor in Alabama resigning—
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo…..-by-Friday
Nope
Sorry Siegelman–Gov Siegelman
One big fly in the ointment is Leura Canary, the Bush-appointed US Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama. (Alice Martin was in the Northern District.) Leura led the prosecution of Siegleman until she finally turned it over to her assistant. Leura and husband Bill are in the thick of this.
http://www.time.com/time/natio…..91,00.html
Leura still has her position.
OT, but note re Salem left for you two threads back.
Just saw it. Many thnx.
Hey Karl!
Doesn’t the truth suck?
Say hi to Jeff Gannon from us, OK?
Regarding the Leura Canary & Alice Martin connection as US Attornies:
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpoi…..ce_martin/