Kansas' Lobbying Helps France Fly Citi to Its Tax Shelters

Update: Apparently, Obama has explained to these Citi leeches the wisdom of giving up their new jet, and they have acceded to his demand wisdom. Well, so far, new-and-improved TARP is better than the old version.

It’s not that I’m bitter that Congress took away GM’s and Chrysler’s (but not Cerberus’) jets (in fact, I’ll let you in on a little secret. Without the jets it’ll make it hard to do business with suppliers in locations–like northern Mexico–that aren’t really well served by commercial airlines).

It’s that this makes the US look like world class chumps.

You see, earlier this month, Barney Frank tried to take the corporate jets away from those on Wall Street who–like GM and Chrysler–are sucking on the government teat to survive. Only, Kansas Congressman Dennis Moore hassled Barney until he took that provision out of the new-and-improved TARP.

To make sure corporate America got the message, Mr. Frank dropped a provision into the latest bailout bill, H.R. 384, the TARP Reform and Accountability Act, requiring would-be recipients of taxpayer funds to dump their corporate fleets. The message: If you want taxpayer money, sell your jet and fly commercial.

That sure sounded tough. And it sure sent a message to the automakers. When they came back to Washington, they drove.

But last week, Rep. Frank quietly stripped the no-jet provision from the bill. Why?

In a word: Kansas.

Kansas is a hub of aircraft manufacturing, particularly the making of corporate jets. One of Frank’s fellow Democrat[ic–sic] congressmen, Rep. Dennis Moore of Kansas, sent the powerful chairman a note that delicately suggested he re-think the tough talk.

"We have to be careful about Congress overreacting," Moore wrote in a statement.

What he told CNN he wrote to Chairman Frank was more diplomatic.

"It is clear that the auto executives were insensitive to American taxpayers when they flew in their private jets to request billions of dollars," wrote Moore. "But I have concerns that applying this well-intended provision may have unintended consequences of hurting the general aviation industry and its workers."

The congressman pointed out pointed out that 44,000 workers in Kansas work directly for the airplane manufacturing industry, and a lot of families depend on those paychecks. Last Tuesday, the "no-fly" language was dropped, and yet another get-tough message from Congress got a soft landing.

Late today, Chairman Frank sent a statement to CNN explaining his decision. "The private aircraft industry is an important industry in America, and it plays a necessary role with businesses in certain areas of the country,"

Now, less than a week after that provision came out of new-and-improved-TARP, the NYPost reports that Citi is set to take delivery on a brand new–French–corporate jet.

Beleaguered Citigroup is upgrading its mile-high club with a brand-new $50 million corporate jet – only this time, it’s the taxpayers who are getting screwed.

Even though the bank’s stock is as cheap as a gallon of gas and it’s burning through a $45 billion taxpayer-funded rescue, the airhead execs pushed through the purchase of a new Dassault Falcon 7X, according to a source familiar with the deal.

The French-made luxury jet seats up to 12 in a plush interior with leather seats, sofas and a customizable entertainment center, according to Dassault’s sales literature. It can cruise 5,950 miles before refueling and has a top speed of 559 mph.

There are just nine of these top-of-the-line models in the United States, with Dassault’s European factory churning out three to four 7Xs a month.

Citigroup decided to get its new wings two years ago, when the financial-services giant was flush with cash, but it still intends to take possession of the jet this year despite its current woes, the source said.

I suspect the finance industry is a lot like the auto industry. If we just take away their jets, it’ll make it more difficult for them to do business in places we’d rather not have them do business in. Only, unlike the auto industry, it’s not Northern Mexico. More likely it’s places like the Caymans and Mauritius, which Citi have been using to avoid paying US taxes.

As it is, though, I guess those Citi execs will be flying in fine French style to their tax havens around the world. 

image_print
  1. emptywheel says:

    And they are billing you, personally.

    Damnit, if this doesn’t piss some people off enough to nationalize Citi (which, unfortunately, will cause the Saudis to disown us), I don’t know what will.

  2. MadDog says:

    My how time flies.
    Time is money.
    Does this mean money flies too?
    Who are we kidding?
    Money always flies!

    Shorter Citigroup: “Let them eat cake.”

  3. freepatriot says:

    why does barney frank bother to explain about the American Aircraft industry ???

    just tell reporters to go talk to the repuglitard congresscritter Dennis Moore

    he’s the dingleberry who objected to the private jet provision

    let the repuglitards own their incompetence

    stop making excuses for these dipshits

    • freepatriot says:

      and while I’m on the topic of tearning the repuglitards a thousand new assholes, can any google abled compatriot out there find some of those quotes about how disagreeing with the President is treason, so we can put lush limpbag and his ilk in the “traitor’s dustbin” of history

      how about a commrade ???

      anybody

      • Loo Hoo. says:

        Lots of people disagreed with Bush, and that wasn’t treason. It was patriotism.

        I know what you mean though, he has such a large megaphone, and for him (and Hannity) to spew lie after lie, day after day, ought to elicit a slander suit.

      • R.H. Green says:

        Not a quote, but one could remind the deaf one that voting against the president is disagreeing with him, and therefore…

  4. judyo says:

    The “big” 2 & 1/2 did not sell all of their jets.
    I think you’ll find that they get to Mexico just fine. Maybe not with a side trip to Cancun but, oh dear, we just can’t have everything we think we’re entitled to.

  5. phred says:

    So what I want to know is where is the bakers lobby in all of this??? I am so worried about corporate America’s access to cake. How will they be able to eat cake if they spend all their pin money on jets and champagne? Marie Antoinette, where are you when we so desperately need you?!?!

  6. MadDog says:

    Totally OT – EW, I don’t know if you saw this, so pardon my interruption:

    Responses to Dennis C. Blair Post-hearing Questions (Nomination of Admiral Dennis Blair to be Director of National Intelligence)

    FISA Amendments Act

    Question: The FISA Amendments Act of 2008 included important civil liability protections for those providers who assisted the government with the Terrorist Surveillance Program in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks. According to this Act, in order for the liability protections to apply, the Attorney General must first file a certification with the court. Last fall, Attorney General Mukasey filed the appropriate certifications.

    Do you believe that those private partners who assisted the government should be given civil liability protection?

    Answer: Yes. The terms and conditions of that civil liability protection are spelled out in the FISA Amendments Act.

    If confirmed as the DNI, will you recommend that the Attorney General honor the certifications submitted by Attorney General Mukasey?

    Answer: Yes.

  7. SamJack says:

    I agree that it’s too bad about the jets, but a couple things about Dennis Moore and Kansas. For one, Dennis Moore is a Democrat, not a Republican. For another, there are actual jobs tied up with the jet manufacturing that happens in Kansas. Like, thousands of jobs. So while I agree that it’s tawdry for these people to be flying luxury jets, and that it’s too bad that the jets are made by the French, and not by the Kansas workers, I think you all need to cut Dennis some slack. He’s just looking out for his constituents interests, as he is supposed to do.

    • freepatriot says:

      I think you all need to cut Dennis some slack.

      homeboy got played for a FOOL, didn’t he ???

      slack ???

      I don’t think so

      the thing ya gotta learn about the American electorate is this: We’ve given these assholes in Washington DC all the fucking slack they’re gonna get

      george bush used up all their reserve supply of “slack”

      it’s time to pull their heads out of their assholes and wake the fuck up

      anybody who remains in the asshole inverted position is getting the fucking BOOT

    • emptywheel says:

      Oh, I agree he was looking out for his constituents’ interests. Though I do not believe anyone is entitled to a pass simply bc they are Democrats.

      But his lobbying didn’t help out his constituents much, did it?

  8. PJEvans says:

    Cessnas aren’t high-powered enough for the execs, and Boeings are too … common. (Can’t think of any other planes built in KS.)

    I have a friend who keeps telling me that Obama will get what he wants from Congress, and I just have to wait for it to happen. I’d believe him, except this same friend told me that Roberts would be a great Chief Justice.

  9. Rayne says:

    Sorry, I think there is a point at which private planes are appropriate.

    As a shareholder, I don’t want the guy I’m paying $500 to $800 an hour standing around doing nothing. I want him being productive and working off his ass every hour of the day that he’s on the job, 60-80 hours a week. If he’s standing in a queue in an airport someplace, he can’t be on a conference call sharing proprietary info. And what if he and other executives are spending thousands each week on airfare — perhaps as much as $150,000 each per year on tickets? Wow, I could afford to buy and depreciate a plane in short order between the cost of airfare and the lost opportunity cost of executives’ time standing around unproductive.

    There are other companies who own planes for these reasons, and we’re not bitching about them only because as taxpayers we aren’t being asked to pay for the planes without a return on investment.

    What I think the situation is screaming for is a new business venture, a private co-op or a privately held company that certain corporations use to “share” planes. Can’t tell me there aren’t a lot of flights between certain locations for which executives of different companies already have overlapping flights. Maybe Rep. Dennis Moore ought to be talking with his aero-constituent about looking at business models, VC funding and grants for something like this…

  10. skylights says:

    Whoa, before calling anyone a “republitard,” try this little thing called Google. Moore is a Democrat. Although he’s a Blue Dog, he deserves more respect than “republitard.” He votes the progressive position more often than not.

  11. astilbe says:

    H**l, can’t they just RENT a plane when they need it? I mean it’s not like they are IN THE PLANE 24/7. They have to spend some time in the office, no?

    • klynn says:

      Why didn’t they just state the plane belongs to the US citizens and that CITI will rent it from us for each flight needed. The flight logs will be posted on the internet so we know how often it is used and where the execs are flying.