Conyers Notices the Similarities to US Attorney Purge, Too

John Conyers has not missed what we’ve been seeing: a replay of the US Attorney scandal. He talks about the attacks on ACORN, the improper use of prosecutorial resources to intimidate voters, the waste of investigative resources when the FBI is already failing to investigate mortgage-related fraud, and the seeming preferential use of federal investigative resources to target Democrats. But here’s my favorite bit:

Furthermore, it is deeply troubling that, just weeks after the Department’s own watchdogs documented the role that specious agitating on alleged vote fraud matters by New Mexico Republicans played in the firing of United States Attorneys in 2006, in this controversy we see the same figures cropping up again and apparently obtaining a new FBI investigation just in time for the 2008 election. Thus a lawyer named Pat Rogers–described in the local press as "an attorney who advises the state GOP" is apparently playing a key role in pressing these current claims. Mr. Rogers, however, appears repeatedly in the report on the U.S. Attorney firings prepared by the Department’s Offices of the Inspector General and Professional Responsibility, which documented his actions making flawed claims of voter fraud and brining unwarranted pressure to bear on law enforcement officials, including Mr. Iglesias, in 2006.

As I glossed the other day, 

Republicans are already under criminal investigation for this stuff. Don’t let them get away with the same kind of criminal conduct again.

Of course, as Kagro X has pointed out, Mukasey can blow off Conyers (as he has Conyers’ request for more urgency on voter protection) precisely because we didn’t get the evidence from Miers and Turdblossom to make this case legally before we got back into election fever.

So here we are, with the subpoenas still unenforced in the case that was supposed to crack the "administration’s" engineering of bogus "voter fraud" allegations against Democrats immediately preceding critical elections wide open, and now witnessing… the "administration" engineering bogus "voter fraud" allegations against Democrats immediately preceding a critical election. 

Like Alberto Gonzales, Mukasey seems to have lost all shame about allowing the GOP to play these games. 

image_print
27 replies
  1. MsAnnaNOLA says:

    So maybe the Dems can enforce those subpeonas sooner rather than later. It seems like they are staying in session anyway to look after the 700billion dollar bailout. Maybe they can stay in session to protect Americans right to vote two weeks before the election.

  2. Citizen92 says:

    There have been a few references to the arrest today of Mark Anthony Jacoby for his own false voter registration. Jacoby and his companies have been accused of circulating false petitions and changing people’s voter registrations in California, Arizona and Florida.

    It appears as though someone had a vendetta against Jacoby over a debt. That vendetta was personally aired on youtube (both in video and in comments):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fg0s973bNfQ

    Jacoby doesn’t seem to be a likeable guy.

  3. jdmckay says:

    I’ve been working around the house all day, had these hearings on all day. Very, very disturbing… feels like 2k recounts all over again.

    Thus a lawyer named Pat Rogers–described in the local press as “an attorney who advises the state GOP” is apparently playing a key role in pressing these current claims. Mr. Rogers, however, appears repeatedly in the report on the U.S. Attorney firings prepared by the Department’s Offices of the Inspector General and Professional Responsibility, which documented his actions making flawed claims of voter fraud and brining unwarranted pressure to bear on law enforcement officials, including Mr. Iglesias, in 2006.

    That “local paper” is the Albuquerque Journal. That lawyer (Rogers) had repeatedly… at least 5 times since attn scandal broke, written incendiary and mostly false OpEDs… sees the ABQJ seeks him out. First time I saw one, he was attributed as an “Albuquerque Lawyer”. I was curious, googled… he is and has been RNC lawyer, elevated to chair (??? not sure exact title) of this group. This is the bunch formed out of 2k RNC recount efford.

    I had letter to editor some time ago complaining about his attribution, the Journal printed a correction… once. Since then, he’s been back to “an Albuquerque Lawyer.”

    I did not know he was behind ACORN accusations… they’ve been big here, all over papers and TV. I’m not surprised Rogers behind it. I’d sure like to know Conyers sources on this.

    I’ve been devoting considerable time to Udall’s effort here, now ramping up early voting GOTV. I haven’t had any direct contact w/ACORN here, but there’s people I know who have. I just don’t believe any of it, based on reliable 2nd hand accounts.

    Again, if you can point me to or inform me of Conyer’s source(s) in citing Rogers, I’d really like to know. If reliable, there’s some useful things I’d like to do w/that stuff. I don’t have resources @ hand to get info from Conyer’s office. Will simple email be responded to? Do you have to know someone?

    And BTW, saw film today that early voting in dem florida precincts have hours long lines. BradBlog also cites Florida voting machines flipping to Repubs (again), regardless of selections.

    This is getting really, really ugly… really really fast.

    Several of the repubs testifying before Conyers ripped off whole list of alleged ACORN crimes, as did committee’s ranking Az. Rep. He read off same long list of ACORN allegations, to uninformed sounded pretty bad. Lofgren challenged his sources (FBI investigations in 12 states), he said he’d get back w/the committee on that. W/ more prompting he said his source was WSJ. I have that article, it’s from OpED page last week (whole bunch of these).

    • bmaz says:

      Is that Trent Franks you are describing? If so, that is one dumb mofo. I am embarrassed to admit he is from Arizona. Really bad.

    • jdmckay says:

      I find myself wondering if Rogers was deliberately mis-attributed AP source for ACORN FBI investigations…///??? this was done repeatedly, only later confirmed, throughout all kinds of “anonymous” sources cited for various crap disseminated through media during entire Iraq fiasco.

      He’s certainly capable of it. ABQJ published “dualing OpED’s” after IG report was released: Iglesias vs. Rogers. Among other things, Rogers cited an example democrat’s voting malfeasance: their denying military votes in 2k election. Those who were paying attention will recognize the utter dishonesty in that one. Those who were paying close attention will recall that that statement is not only false… not only did dems agree to waive laws disallowing late military ballot submissions, repubs went on to litigate accepting them in Florida’s repub precincts while denying them in dem precincts.

      This is typical Rogers. Long list of such claims in ABQJ on his behalf. Rogers was petitioning attn in ‘04 attempt to get NADER on prez ballot here, after NADER’s petitions (which rumor mills had Rogers involved in) were thrown out by state’s supreme court… chocked full of invalid sigs.

      One other thing from the hearings: the US Assistant Civil Rights Attn on the panel (don’t have her name, never heard of her before) was asked about (among other things) her offices actions, if any, on reported caging. Short answer, none… no action. She said (my paraphrase) that “frequently, when we send a representative to the voting locations these things are not done”. Nobody mentioned the damage from caging is completed by that time.

      I’ll go back and get here name… I’m wonder if she was one of political appointees along the way? She said she had backround bothe in DOD and Pentagon.

    • BargainCountertenor says:

      Rogers is an Albuquerque attorney (he’s a shareholder in Modrall), it’s just that he’s rather more than that.

      He lists his business as 80% litigation, 10% each to lobbying and administration. My guess is that most of his litigation is on behalf of the RNC and RPNM.

      I really hate it when the Journal glosses over that sort of thing.

  4. rosalind says:

    sorry to go OT so soon, but speaking of depressing:

    Nearly 7,000 rape-kits sit on LAPD freezer shelves awaiting testing with at least 217 of those past the statute of limitations, rendering them useless even if a rapist is identified by the DNA collected.

    the next time i run into chief bratton at the local grocery store i will have to use all my powers of self control as i express my displeasure with this statistic.

  5. JohnLopresti says:

    I wonder where DIglesias might be in the vote dustdevil at present. One account I read a mere few months ago recounted his early reputation before he was expurgated from the US Atty post, as a Republican US atty already with a rep for asiduous pursuit of any kind of shenanigans in the vote process; the reasoning of the narrative proceded, that special interest of Iglesias’ weakened even further HWilson’s and PDoxxx’s pleas which, according to Rovian PartyLine, depicted Iglesias’ work as malfeased, especially given the US Atty Sampson class A list exercised its most prurient of interests upon US attys whose available replacements would make voter suppressive efforts on behalf of the national Reublican party agenda. Which is to say, Conyers has remained ahead of this story from early on. Linkless, with regrets, on the Iglesias as vote protector reference, as I remain on a backup workstation momentarily, can supply a link, hopefully, in a little while, pending equipment swaps here.

    • BargainCountertenor says:

      There was an Iglesias OpEd late last week in the Journal that basically said this is the same tired old shit. Don’t expect it to get better.

  6. JohnLopresti says:

    With Powell’s endorsement yesterday, I would imagine Repulbicans less than ebulliently getting exercised Brooks Brothers manner, concering how necessary a precise count of stationed military’s votes will be this election. Something about the Qahtani process designed by Principals meetings has a feeling of being something Powell would eschew summarily. I would even wonder how he interprets the Armitage phalanx’s support of the 2×4×6. Those two facets of his work as secretary of state seemed likely explanations of his decision to depart the administration. He had refused to state his party of affiliation very early before his recruitment.

    • BargainCountertenor says:

      Oh, c’mon. Dontcha know that Powell’s endorsement was just (wink) those people stickin’ together?

      Golly, everyone’s sayin’ so!

  7. jdmckay says:

    Stanley Kurtz (NRO) currently doing his OBAMA ACORN nexus hit piece on C-SPAN2. Most of what I’ve heard him say was from this article he posted OCT 7.

    Worth reading and/or listening to if you want to get idea of story lines OBAMA is up against w/this stuff.

  8. AZ Matt says:

    Getting wide play

    From Sam Stein at Huff Po

    John McCain’s campaign has directed $175,000 to the firm of a Republican operative accused of massive voter registration fraud in several states.

    According to campaign finance records, a joint committee of the McCain-Palin campaign, the RNC and the the California Republican Party, made a $175,000 payment to the group Lincoln Strategy in June for purposes of “registering voters.” The managing partner of that firm is Nathan Sproul, a renowned GOP operative who has been investigated on multiple occasions for suppressing Democratic voter turnout, throwing away registration forms and even spearheading efforts to get Ralph Nader on ballots to hinder the Democratic ticket.

    In a letter to the Justice Department last October, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers said that that Sproul’s alleged activities “clearly suppress votes and violate the law.”

    • bmaz says:

      Hey Matt, that dick is from here! Sproul is the theo-wingnut that fronted the campaigns of Trent Franks, Andrew Thomas and Len Munsil. Ugly piece of work.

  9. bgrothus says:

    Rep. Justine Fox-Young, the front-woman on the ABQ registration “fraud” used to work in the office of Mickey Barnett, another of the R lawyers in ABQ. They are all tied together.

    I have been suggesting that the voter action folks here have a press conference related to this, just as a way to push back with the facts.

  10. Neil says:

    Watch a clip here from Alexandra Pelosi’s HBO film “Diary of a Political Tourist”](yes Nancy’s Daughter) catches a tipsy Congressman Peter King making a comment at a White House function before the election had even been started declaring that, “It’s already over. The Election’s over. We Won.”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvnEe6n2MW4

  11. klynn says:

    Hey Marcy,

    The wingery here in OH is only hearing ACORN, ACORN, ACORN, democrats, democrats, democrats, voter fraud, voter fraud voter fraud.

    I just walked a Rep neighbor through the evidence and she walked away saying, “I still think the Dems are going to steal this election.”

    There is a story here that needs to get out in the form of a timeline.

Comments are closed.