I noted on Friday that the McCain campaign had argued that it was okay to carry out a paranoid vendetta against someone who had exhibited erratic behavior.
But did you know they rationalized their concern by describing Mike Wooten’s–Sarah’s former bro-in-law–"long history of unstable and erratic behavior"?
Although the report describes Wooten as a separate issue, the McCain campaign goes into great detail about the "rogue" trooper and his "long history of unstable and erratic behavior."
So in case you’re wondering, the McCain camp agrees that the guy with the long history of unstable and erratic behavior is a menace to society.
Today, they’ve repeated their warnings about erratic behavior, suggesting that erratic politicians can’t be trusted to handle your money.
Investors are always responsible for their investment decisions, but the hard earned savings of Americans should not be penalized by the erratic behavior of politicians.
See, they’re consistent about one thing! You shouldn’t elect people who have the kind of erratic behavior exhibited by their campaign.