The USA Purge: DOJ’s IG Punts

Well over a year after the Department of Justice’s Inspector General started an investigation into the US Attorney firings, they’re set to punt tomorrow. They won’t refer Gonzales–or anyone else–for prosecution, but they will recommend that someone–someone with subpoena power–continue the investigation.

Justice Inspector General Glenn A. Fine and Office of Professional Responsibility director H. Marshall Jarrett, who wrote the report, will not absolve Justice Department officials of blame but will recommend that efforts continue to resolve unanswered questions, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the findings have not yet been made public. 

The problem, it seems, is the same problem that prevented Congress from determining the truth behind the US Attorney firings: key participants refused to cooperate.

An intense effort to determine how the firing plan originated and whether perjury or obstruction of justice laws were violated in refusing to reveal the basis for the dismissals has been thwarted, partly because investigators lack the power to compel testimony from people outside of the Justice Department.

[snip]

Investigators did not win access to lawmakers and their assistants or former White House aides despite attempts to interview them.

Yeah, those key participants: Harriet Miers, Turdblossom, Bush, Domenici and his staffers, Heather Wilson and her staffers, etcetera. What a surprise. Mukasey’s refusal to appoint a prosecutor last year–and his ongoing support for the claims of executive privilege and absolute immunity–bought the White House a year in their attempts to stall or quash this investigation.

And, as if you didn’t already guess, Mukasey seems unprepared to appoint a special counsel to investigate this–he seems poised to appoint someone internal, just as he did with the torture tape destruction investigation.

Despite calls from some of the fired U.S. attorneys, Mukasey will not name a special prosecutor from outside the department. Instead, he intends to hand over the project to a career lawyer with experience in public corruption work, the sources said. 

Tune in tomorrow where we see yet more evidence of DOJ’s changing stories about why they fired the US Attorneys.

image_print
  1. TheOtherWA says:

    EW, you’re fast. I read the WaPo article and came here to see if you’d seen it. Seen it, dissected it and got a post up already.

    Instead, he intends to hand over the project to a career lawyer with experience in public corruption work, the sources said.

    A loyal career lawyer, of course. It’s the only way to control the investigation into a new, Obama administration. These people are soooo predictable.

  2. Teddy Partridge says:

    Thanks, Chuck.

    Thanks, Dianne.


    Hope Schumer and Feinstein are happy with what they’ve wrought at Justice. He’s their Attorney General as much as he is Bush’s.

    • Arbusto says:

      I believe Chuckie and DiFink got exactly what they wanted, circular buck passing. The political class will not hold one another accountable on their acts. Look for the same saga under Obama and the DINO’s next year, god and Diebolds willing.

  3. Leen says:

    “someone with subpoena power” Just who would that be?

    The Bush administration’s disregard for congress, and the rule of law has been trickling down to the peasants. I am sure that we will hear the Rove/Meiers/Bush/Palin ignore congressional or state justice subpoenas argument.

    To the lawyer folks is this what you call a Presidential “precedent” Such high regard for the law trickling down

  4. SaltinWound says:

    “Lawmakers and their assistants” could also refer to how exactly the clause was slipped in that allowed all this to happen, something Senate Judiciary hasn’t wanted to examine.

  5. skdadl says:

    If Mukasey hands “the project” over for further investigation, can Leahy and Co still summon Fine and Jarrett to public hearings?

    (I’m uncertain of what your congressional calendar must look like from now on.)

  6. freepatriot says:

    let bush kick the can down the road till january 20, 2009

    then the can gets picked up and opened on national television, with at least 60 Democratic Senators and a big majority in the house

    should take all of 2 hours to pass and sign a bill appointing a special prosecutor or two, or ten …

    RICO

    RICO

    RICO

    keep playin kick the can, george …

    throw US in to that briar patch

  7. Citizen92 says:

    CREW’s gonna depose David Addington this week.

    Be sure to send your questions about OVP’s recordkeeping habits their way.

  8. bmaz says:

    Ah, Captain Renault has returned to say that he is shocked, shocked to see that there is nothing but time wasting, dithering and whitewashing coming out of the IG/OPR Spanish Inquisition thorough investigation. Really, um, who could have predicted this? Well, okay, I know of one guy, but he is a jerk, so I won’t mention his name….

    • Citizen92 says:

      Everyone saw this happening in real time. I mean, really, was Fine going to be allowed to find out anything?

      Remember back when…

      Karl Rove stopped by the White House Counsel’s office to ask “how we plan to proceed regarding US Attorneys in January 2005

      and

      How that comepelled a Presidential lawyer named David G. Leitch to talk about the subject with Kyle Sampson over email one day later

      and

      How that same David G. Leitch is a “friend of Gonzales’” and is raising money for Gonzales’ Defense Fund

      and

      How that same David G. Leitch somehow landed a cush job as General Counsel at Ford Motor Company

      Good times.

      And, O/T, speaking of the revolving door, I mean really. WH COS Josh Bolten was an Executive for Goldman Sachs. Treasury Secretary Paulson was Chairman. And the guy structuring all these bailouts, Ken Wilson, is on loan from Goldman Sachs to the Treasury.

      Is it really a surprise that Goldman isn’t going under. And that Warren Buffet just gave them $5BN? And that they’re sucking up assets just like Bank of America?

  9. jayt says:

    Well over a year after the Department of Justice’s Inspector General started an investigation …

    they find out that they can’t do shit.

    And it took ‘em a year to figure out that the can’t do shit?

    What a coincidence that the officials being investigated won’t have to sweat any *new* investigation now, because they know:

    1) Mukasey is totally in the bag, and

    2) All relevant players will be pardoned before any investigation with teeth can possibly be conducted.

    Mission accomplished. A tip o’ the hat to the Republican crime machine, which actually *knows* how to play this game.

  10. behindthefall says:

    I’d like to see this ripoff bailout pushed down the road to February 2009. (Actually, to “never” would be even better.)

  11. 4jkb4ia says:

    This will explain why Fine did not go into the White House end of his Goodling report. For purposes of that report Goodling being White House liaison was sufficient to show some WH influence.

  12. sailmaker says:

    Is there any possibility that we could impeach Mukasey? Obviously he is not going to defend the Consitution or anything else but Bushco, so shouldn’t we impeach his tush so that we never ever have to see his butt on a bench or anywhere else on the federal payroll???

    • freepatriot says:

      Is there any possibility that we could impeach Mukasey

      why bother

      you been watchin the mcsame clown college campaign lately ???

      looks like mucasy is about to develop a seriously fatal case of “experation date” real soon

      lets save impeachment for alito, roberts, scalia, and thomas

  13. freepatriot says:

    if I pologize for the remark about the WaMu ad, would you consider gracing us with your thoughts on john mcsame, jack abramoff, an the ny times

    I wanna see if I forgot anything that the times missed or overlooked on purpose

    like mcsame hidin millions of documents to protect repuglitards, stuff like that

    Please, please, please

    oh, yeah, almost forgot:

    I humbly apologize for any remark I might have made that offended you of your family, or your dog (sorry, I don’t apologize to cats, fish or hamsters)

    that was a pretty good one, mostly I apologize kinda like Otto in “A Fish Called Wanda”

  14. bluebutterfly says:

    Two must see videos at whatreallyhappened. The first one is a video of Rep. Burgess. In it he says,”I understand that we are under Martial Law as declared by the Speaker last night.” I am not sure, but it didn’t sound like he was joking.

    The second is a video of Rep. Marcy Kaptur calling the ones pushing for this bill criminals.