Burma Shave – Bush Busts Out A Compassion Beard

This is shaping up to be a monumental week with important news flying in like a furious wind from every direction, from the primary election battle, to all of the various political scandals, to diplomatic agendas, the Iraq war that has taken a shockingly deadly turn for the worse on all fronts with little notice by the distracted and weary public, to, of course, the economy. Saddle up cowboys and cowgirls, it could be a rough ride. Oh yes, and Marcy will be back soon, rested and ready herself.

The first blow to land for the week did not fly in like a furious wind, it was a furious wind. Specifically a typhoon that blew a path of waste and destruction through the already destitute and oppressed tinderbox that is currently known as Myanmar, and was formerly known as Burma.

The cyclone and storm surge that tore through Myanmar’s Irrawaddy delta killed at least 15,000 people and left 30,000 missing, officials said on Tuesday, warning the toll could rise in low-lying, remote villages.

Giving the first detailed account of the worst cyclone to hit Asia since 1991, when 143,000 people died in Bangladesh, Foreign Minister Nyan Win said on state television 10,000 people had died just in Bogalay, a town 90 km (50 miles) southwest of Yangon.

After a meeting with Myanmar’s ambassador to Bangkok, Thai Foreign Minister Noppadol Pattama said he had been told 30,000 people were missing after Saturday’s devastating storm.

The total left homeless by the 190 km (120 miles) per hour winds and 12 foot (3.5 meter) storm surge is in the several hundred thousands, United Nations aid officials say.

The scale of the disaster in the military-ruled southeast Asian nation drew a rare acceptance of outside help from the diplomatically isolated generals, who spurned such approaches in the aftermath of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami.

If there are words sufficient to describe the desperate plight of the people of Myanmar, then they surely escape me. It does add a degree of relative perspective to the mere struggles of democracy we labor on here daily. The random vagaries and inequalities of the human condition on this planet are both stunning and stark; but for a virtually indecipherable molecular difference in a couple of genetic alleles, there may go you or I. Very sobering. I will leave substantive analysis of what, if anything, can be done for these poor souls in Myanmar to better and more capable minds than mine. What struck my curiosity was the official reaction and statement of the United States government in response to the tragedy.

Now, we all know that special brand of compassionate interest that George W. Bush oozes exudes in the hours and days following a catastrophic human predicament caused by the wind and water fury of nature. In case your recollection needs refreshing, here is the record from just such an occurrence right here in his own country that he supposedly leads.

So if that is what Bush does when it is the citizens of one of the great cities of his own country dying from the deluge; what does he do when it’s the po folk of some remote, destitute country in Southeastern Asia instead of the po folk of New Orleans? Nothing, he doesn’t make any effort at all; instead he inexplicably trots out his automaton wife, Laura, to stand at the Presidential podium in the White House and address the tragedy. From Dan Eggen at the Washington Post:

Laura Bush condemned the military government in Burma yesterday for its "inept" response to a deadly weekend cyclone, marking an unusual foray by the president’s spouse into a high-profile foreign policy crisis.

Appearing at a White House news conference, the first lady said the military junta in Burma is preventing the United States and other nations from providing help in the wake of Tropical Cyclone Nargis, and she alleged that the country’s rulers purposely declined to warn people of the impending danger.

Very nice. Both brilliant and sensitive. Or not. One of the dictionary definitions of "beard" is:

…a person who diverts suspicion from someone (especially a woman who accompanies a male homosexual in order to conceal his homosexuality)

And that is exactly what we have here, Laura is propped up as a beard to mask the fact that Bush just doesn’t give a damn and can’t be bothered. Probably too busy hitting the treadmill in the gym with Condiliar Rice to be concerned with people who actually subsist on rice, and just had their rice producing region obliterated. i guess i shouldn’t complain, Laura actually did a better job of reading the prepared statement than her husband could have managed, although she did mangle and misrepresent a couple of facts in her personal zeal to decry the military junta running Myanmar. This is certainly not an earth shattering fact in the relative scheme of things, but it is a rather sad and pathetic reflection on the man at the helm of our republic.

In closing, a little background on the source of the title to this post is in order. Burma-Shave was a United States brand of brushless shaving cream, famous for its advertising gimmick of posting humorous rhyming poems on small, sequential highway billboard signs.

Burma-Shave sign series appeared from 1925 to 1963 in most of the contiguous United States. The exceptions were New Mexico, Arizona, and Nevada (deemed to have insufficient road traffic), and Massachusetts (eliminated due to that state’s high land rentals and roadside foliage). Four or five consecutive small billboards would line highways, so they could be read consecutively by motorists driving by. The signs themselves were originally produced in two color combinations: red-and-white, and orange-and-black, though the latter combination was dropped after only a few years. A special white-on-blue set of signs was developed for South Dakota, which restricted the color red to official warning notices.

This use of the billboard was a highly successful advertising gimmick during the early years of the automobile, drawing attention and passers-by who were curious to discover the punchline. However, as the Interstate system expanded in the late 1950s and average vehicle speeds increased, it became increasingly difficult to attract motorists’ attention with relatively small signs, especially near major cities with their burgeoning arterial interchanges.

For more on Burma Shave, and what was one of the most innovative and legendary advertising schemes in history, see here. We won’t be needing the help of Burma Shave to cut through Bush’s beard though, it is already so thin and transparent that it is almost non-existent.

image_print
77 replies
  1. GeorgeSimian says:

    I wondered what Laura Bush was doing, then I realized it was probably because of W’s massive fuck up with Katrina that they didn’t want to make it seem like he was more interested in helping Burma than New Orleans. But still, after all these years of saying that a first lady should know her place, what the hell is Laura Bush telling Burma about how evil their country is?

  2. MarieRoget says:

    Great post to start off the day, bmaz.
    OT-Got to drive over to the office now & will unfortunately have to catch up later on all the congressional hearings going on today- 10 a.m. House Judiciary subcommittee looks particularly interesting. Selise’s list of today’s hearings is posted on the prev. thread.

    I went to a couple of Burma Shave links for nostalgia’s sake:

    SUBSTITUTES
    CAN LET YOU DOWN
    QUICKER
    THAN A
    STRAPLESS GOWN
    BURMA SHAVE

    Got to go. Read you all later.

  3. Minnesotachuck says:

    On the south side of Austin, Texas, on Ben White Blvd., there is a restaurant called the Catfish Parlour that has a dozen or more BurmaShave sign sets up on the walls. I saw them many times when having lunch there with my client around ten years ago. They brought back a lot of memories when I used to watch for them on our periodic drives to the Twin Cities from my small town home in southern Minnesota.

  4. Petrocelli says:

    I love it when repressive regimes claim that Buddhist Monks are terrorists, but to tamp down the day’s negativities, I’d like to share a quote from when I visited the peace loving region that is Burma/Nepal/Tibet …

    “The reason people are lonely is because they build walls instead of bridges”

    Peace and Love to you all.

  5. watercarrier4diogenes says:

    Don’t know what to make of this, since I haven’t seen a comment on it, even here. From the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU, re: Ali Almarri, dated May 2nd:

    Government Destroyed Tapes; Admits to Holding More

    Not so interesting that the Govt. has admit destroying tapes, but that they also admit that the DIA has nine more tapes that they’re withholding…

  6. Hugh says:

    Current estimates are now 22,000 (which will rise), hundreds of thousands without clean water, and a million homeless. Burma’s military junta only cares about the maintenance of its own power. It is doing nothing to help its own population and a consequence of its own paranoia is not letting in international aid.

    • bmaz says:

      …only cares about the maintenance of its own power. It is doing nothing to help its own population and a consequence of its own paranoia is not letting in international aid.

      Gee Hugh, when you put it that way (and PJ too), when have we heard that before? Undoubtedly an entry on your list. Ah, wait a minute, rulers concerned only about themselves refusing international aid, here we go, something along the lines of this perhaps.

  7. PJEvans says:

    Now they’re saying 40,000 dead, at least.
    The government there is reluctantly allowing international aid.
    It is much like Bush and Katrina. He reacted way too little, way too late, and people are still waiting for the help he was promising.

    • Hugh says:

      The government there is reluctantly allowing international aid.

      But, in fact, they have not given any visas to international aid workers so they can’t get in the country. What aid is being given out out is coming from supplies in country from workers in country. It is nowhere near what is needed.

    • Anna says:

      Remember Castro offered to send aid and over a 1000 health care professionals to New Orleans.

      Laura Bush did mangle those statements

      What a tragedy in Burma. There was something in the news about the officials not allowing the warnings to go off.
      http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20…..rcycloneus

      Since Laura is feeling so compassionate wonder if she will ever mention the 4 million refugees in Iraq that her husbands invasion has produced?

  8. klynn says:

    From Reuters via United Nations Relief Web:

    Myanmar cyclone toll climbs to nearly 22,500

    – 22,464 killed and 41,000 missing

    – Referendum postponed in some storm-hit areas

    – States of emergency lifted in some areas

    – Junta accepts outside help (Adds details on storm damage, rice stocks)

    By Aung Hla Tun

    YANGON, May 6 (Reuters) – Myanmar’s military government raised its death toll on Tuesday from the devastating Cyclone Nargis to just under 22,500 people, state media reported.

    An additional 41,000 people were missing as a result of the cyclone, which ploughed into the Irrawaddy delta on Saturday, triggering a massive storm surge that swept inland

    .

    ReliefWeb is a good source for tracking disasters and disaster relief:

    http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rw…..000057-MMR

  9. klynn says:

    This from late in the article:

    “MASSIVE, TERRIBLE”

    Aid agency World Vision in Australia said it had been granted special visas to send in personnel to back up 600 staff in the impoverished Southeast Asian country.

    “This is massive. It is not necessarily quite tsunami level, but in terms of impact of millions displaced, thousands dead, it is just terrible,” World Vision Australia head Tim Costello said.

    “Organizations like ours have been given permission, which is pretty unprecedented, to fly people in. This shows how grave it is in the Burmese government’s mind,” he said.

  10. skdadl says:

    Is anyone else watching the HJC? Rivkin to Sands: the IRA was not an existentialist threat; al Qaeda is.

    Artur Davis is up now. Smart smart smart. I’d vote for him.

      • WilliamOckham says:

        Every time some right-wing bozo says “existential threat”, I want play that clip from The Princess Bride of Inigo Montoya (Mandy Patinkin) saying:

        You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

        • readerOfTeaLeaves says:

          Yeah, and who knew there were so many ‘Six Fingered’ men in the Bush Admin, eh?

          Just on the wires: “U.S. Panel Authorizes Subpoena Of Cheney Aide”
          http://www.nytimes.com/reuters…..heney.html

          At least Congress took a vote.
          Nadler will issue a subpoena, Addington may show up. Or not.
          If he doesn’t, they’ll argue in court till after Jann 09.
          So back to… ‘when is ‘news’ just the same old B.S….?

          As for Laura Bush…. what a walking waste of time she is.

        • JTMinIA says:

          Cheney doesn’t have to obey Exec Branch rules, because he isn’t part of it.

          Cheney’s people don’t have to testify because, as members of the Exec Branch, they are immune.

          I want to be Cheney when I grow up.

  11. skdadl says:

    Rivkin just equated Carter’s blanket pardon of Viet Nam war resisters to any hypothetical blanket pardon any president might give members of his administration for engaging in violations of law involving torture.

    • PJEvans says:

      Rivkin is full of it.
      A lot of war resisters went to jail. Some of them, maybe most of them, served full sentences; they certainly didn’t get pardoned before trial – no ‘get out of jail free’ for them. (I’d bet Bush was one of those cheering those sentences, too.)

  12. Anna says:

    The conditions on this planet “both stunning and stark”

    Saw Laura Bush on C-Span addressing the tragedy in Burma. She mentioned 250,ooo going to Burma. The Bush familiy kind of “compassionate conservatism”

  13. klynn says:

    From AFP

    In Geneva, the United Nations said it had a disaster-assessment team in neighbouring Thailand still awaiting entry visas — while the government underlined that foreign relief experts would not be allowed in automatically.

    “For expert teams from overseas to come here, they have to negotiate with the foreign ministry and our senior authorities,” Maung Maung Swe said.

    Relief officials warned that as time went on, fears were mounting about the risk of disease — on top of the logistical problems of getting aid to many regions that are both remote and densely populated.

    “Getting it out to the affected populations will be a major challenge, given that there is widespread flooding,” said Richard Horsey, a spokesman for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in Bangkok.

  14. Anna says:

    How absurd and that Bush dances on the steps of the White House, after he has destroyed the lives of the Iraqi people.

    If there is a hell the devil is building a whole seperate wing for the Bush administration. May be the largest group of psychopaths to gather in one place at one time!

    Or at the very least they are running for second place after the Nazi’s

  15. klynn says:

    http://www.unisdr.org
    UN/ISDR 2008/05

    6 May 2008

    Early warning systems can save lives when cyclones strike
    After a Category 3 storm ripped through Myanmar’s Irrawaddy delta region on Saturday, the United Nations secretariat of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction stressed the importance of having life-saving early warning systems and preparedness programmes in place when cyclones strike. According to Myanmar state television, Cyclone Nargis has killed at least 15,000 people across the country, and has made hundreds of thousands of people homeless – destroying houses and causing widespread destruction.
    “Many cyclone-prone countries, such as Cuba, Japan, and Bangladesh, have implemented efficient early warning systems that have reduced the death toll caused by cyclones” says Salvano Briceño, Director of the UN/ISDR secretariat. “When there are comprehensive early warning systems in place, starting from meteorological technology all the way through to preparedness and contingency plans, people can be effectively warned and have time to evacuate to safer places.”

    Bangladesh has a 48-hour early warning system in place that allows people to evacuate to safe cyclone shelters hours before any cyclone makes landfall. This has drastically reduced their death tolls from cyclones – from 300,000 deaths from Cyclone Bhola in 1970, to 3000 last November during Cyclone Sidr. “These measures are proven lifesavers,” says Briceño.
    In another example, China has implemented sophisticated systems to identify vulnerable buildings which cannot withstand the wind when cyclones strike. In Wenling city in coastal Zhejiang province, people living in the most vulnerable buildings are individually warned by SMS or by local authorities, and relocated in safer places before a cyclone strikes.
    Myanmar’s previous significant storm in the last ten years killed 236 people in May 2004.

    http://www.unisdr.org/#

    PRESS RELEASE

  16. skdadl says:

    That was a great panel. (Well, Sands, Cohn, and Luban were excellent, as were many of the congresscritturs. And then there was Rivkin.) I wish I had been better prepared. Sands made a great statement about Haynes and Beaver at the end — EW would have explained it all to us at once, o’ course, but I am going to have to look some things up first.

      • skdadl says:

        Loo Hoo, I’m sure there are other people here with better memories and understanding than I have of how the Yoo/Bybee memo and Diane Beaver’s memo (Beaver was staff judge advocate at Guantanamo) and the Haynes memo (all 2002) fit together.

        I think that Sands was emphasizing, at the end of today’s hearing, the point he makes in the excerpt from his book that ran in Vanity Fair (May 2008) — that Gonzales and Haynes (PR press conference in June 2004) were claiming that both the impetus to use certain techniques at Guantanamo and the legal justification for specific techniques rose up the chain from Guantanamo rather than being imposed from Washington. (Scroll down to “The Authorized Version.”) Sands’ point is that that was not true, that the administration in a sense used Diane Beaver to launder decisions that they had already made, and he has laid that article/chapter out to demonstrate that. Read on to Sands’ interview with Beaver, and you can see that she partly grasps that.

        I looked around for more info on her, but I think that Sands’ own article is the best source for now. He isn’t the smoothest narrator I’ve ever read/heard, not in writing nor in speaking either, I have to say. Maybe that’s because he now knows too much, but he is very very substance heavy and transition clipped. I had to read him over and over to get the timeline straight. Och, publishing. (I’m an editor — sorry.)

        I don’t know how much it matters now that Beaver was used in the way she was. The simple narrative would go something like this: by the end of January 2002, Haynes and Rumsfeld were already arguing for departures from the Geneva Conventions in interrogations at Guantanamo (and who knows where else). Much of what followed between then and the composition of the official Haynes memo (November 2002) was a game. Addington’s “new paradigm,” prompted by Haynes and Rumsfeld, was signed by Gonzales and passed on to Bush at the end of January 2002. It seemed important to Sands to stress that at the end of the hearing today.

  17. earlofhuntingdon says:

    Miss Laura, the anesthetized face of compassion, about as much as Team Bush can produce. Bush is telling us that he’s a Hagee follower. His god pissed on the Burmese people’s god. The typhoon is their punishment for the faults of the Burmese Junta. If that conceit were true, what would be in store for us as a result of George Bush’s reign? All of California slipping into the Pacific?

    Typhoons occur in SE Asia regularly, like summer hurricanes along our East Coast, like Katrina. They are not preventable. The devastation they bring is beyond the power of any government’s immediate ability to ameliorate, as would be true for at least 90% of the world’s governments.

    Singling out the death and destruction in Burma, blaming it on the Burmese Junta (no doubt liable for other wrongs) is crude, shameless deceit. It’s an anti-science, anti-intellectual sop to his Base. It’s also an out for Bush who’s so bankrupted our treasury we have no taxpayer funds to help. The Navy battle group he sent to help after the tsunami is tied up, too, not preparing to attack Iran.

    Bush hid in the closet on this one, sucking that pacifier dipped in bourbon, because as your photos make clear, the Bush Junta is no better at repairing such devastation than is the Burmese government. It’s only good at bringing it.

  18. PJEvans says:

    In other news, Robert Vesco, notorious financier (and fugitive from law for a long time) has died.

  19. Petrocelli says:

    Please oh please, let the HJC field questions from some of the brilliant minds here …

  20. MadDog says:

    OT and Breaking – From CREW:

    White House Filing In Crew Lawsuit Reveals No Backup Tapes During Launch Of Iraq War

    Late last night, in response to an order of the court in CREW v. EOP, the White House filed a third declaration of Office of Administration Chief Information Officer Theresa Payton in which the White House admitted, among other things, that it has no backup tapes for White House emails for the period March 1, 2003 through May 22, 2003.

    The White House also argued that it should not be required to save any backup tape pursuant to a court order because, according to the White House, there is no evidence that any White House emails are missing, notwithstanding a wealth of documentation released by the House Oversight Committee and the prior admissions by the White House to the Committee and Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald and its own press officers that emails are, in fact, missing…

    The latest White House filings:

    5/5/2008 – White House Declaration

    5/5/2008 – White House Declaration – Exhibits

      • MadDog says:

        I’m still reading the WH declaration, but my initial analysis is:

        Shorter WH OA: “Since CREW and the NS Archive can’t prove there really are missing emails (ignore our own statements about missing stuff ’cause we be liars, doncha know?), we the OA shouldn’t have to prove there aren’t missing emails.”

        • FrankProbst says:

          I’m still reading the WH declaration, but my initial analysis is:

          Shorter WH OA: “Since CREW and the NS Archive can’t prove there really are missing emails (ignore our own statements about missing stuff ’cause we be liars, doncha know?), we the OA shouldn’t have to prove there aren’t missing emails.”

          I can’t see how this one’s going to impress the judge, who has clearly already had it with the Administration. And Melanie “I had the FBI for breakfast” Sloan hasn’t even taken a whack at it yet.

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      It’s good to see Bush openly stiff the judiciary. Ought to remind folks that when he says “unitary” executive, he’s Al Capone meaning nobody can touch him. I agree, the judge should be drafting contempt citations now and issuing them at peak news time this week. Polite documentary toing and froing will go nowhere. Allowing it is sanctioning Bush’s lawbreaking.

      Bush may not have those tapes, but only because he’s intentionally run a publicly disclosed communications system (unlike the private and privatized, ueber-sophisticated RNC one) that is full of gaps and mismanagement. Apart from keeping to the Cheney directive to hide everything government does, it breaks the law with every transaction it fails to record. The DOJ stiffs making these arguments should also find another line of work; I’d say in the maintenance or food service industries.

  21. BayStateLibrul says:

    Just thinking…
    Where is Pat Leahy?
    The House Judiciary is doing all the heavy lifting

  22. Redshift says:

    Lessee, “inept response”? “Preventing other nations from providing help”? If I didn’t know better, I’d think this statement was written by some mole trying to remind everyone of Katrina.

    • FrankProbst says:

      Looks like it. The article makes it look like it’s on the up-and-up, but I have to wonder if he didn’t land himself a plum job just in time to shut him up.

    • JimWhite says:

      I tried to get Margaret Talev of McClatchy interested in Miller when the story of him being on the list surfaced. He did file one case of fraudulent voting in 2006 just before the election. My guess from reading the press release from his office is that his office got copies both of voter lists and lists of legal aliens from INS who would be ineligible for voting and then did a cross check. She never responded to an email about it.

      That office lost a deputy a few months ago when he got caught in a sex scandal (can’t remember now if it was child porn, or, more likely, soliciting a minor online).

  23. JohnJ says:

    bmaz, don’t have time to link…
    ”FBI Raids Home, Office of Office of Special Counsel”
    goin’ after Block

    • FrankProbst says:

      bmaz, don’t have time to link…
      ”FBI Raids Home, Office of Office of Special Counsel”
      goin’ after Block

      Bloch. It’s starting to pop up on the news sites. Ironic. He’s in their sights for (among other things) illegally erasing his e-mails.

      • readerOfTeaLeaves says:

        Well cat’s pajamas! I came right over as soon as the first RSS item caught my eye:

        http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpoi….._offic.php

        Believe this is on topic under “monumental… etc”.
        Looking forward to everyone’s insights!

        Wowsers.
        What took so long…?
        And what does it mean?
        And does it link in with the CREW news?

        (Fingers crossed and hoping….)

    • klynn says:

      Hey, you had it correct…

      All I have to say is, “It’s about time…”

      Let’s hope this is also about Rove…and Doan’s resignation…

      Perhaps this may be why all the cooperation

    • readerOfTeaLeaves says:

      More linky goodness, NYT finally puts the news online: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05…..quire.html

      But here’s a nice touch — a NYT ‘tea leaf’ takes the form of a “snicker quote“, re: “actually, we strongly suspect the person that we’re quoting is so absolutely, completely full of shit that we’re going to “snicker quote” their bogus attempts at ass covering.” Heh ;-))

      From the NYT link:

      Computers and documents were seized by agents trying to determine whether Mr. Bloch obstructed justice by hiring an outside company to “scrub” his computer files, The Associated Press reported

      .

      • readerOfTeaLeaves says:

        The snicker quote is of Block’s remark, not the FBI’s.
        In case anyone was confused.

      • earlofhuntingdon says:

        That is a skillful misdirection of attention away from the White House’s systemic corruption of its legislatively mandated communications and archival system. It puts a face on a problem (quite likely, not Bloch’s problem) and implies they are strenuously fighting it. All while doing much worse on a grand scale. Hyperbolic hypocrisy is Rove’s stock in trade, but he’s coming out with record-breaking examples almost daily.

  24. JohnJ says:

    Ok one more try…I only get 2 minute breaks to do stuff between machine bootups.

    That was from TPMM which quotes WSJ.

    • MadDog says:

      Since one can’t get to the original WSJ article without subscribing to their blankety-blank service, another news source (NPR) with more of the gory details can be found here.

  25. perris says:

    Saddle up cowboys and cowgirls, it could be a rough ride

    is this snark or deadpan?

    it will be a rough ride, there are no two ways about it

  26. JohnJ says:

    ”Perhaps this may be why all the cooperation…

    irt Addington”

    (I think my browser crashed; can’t reply.)

    Wouldn’t it be great if this it the ”third rate burglary” for this group.

    Aww I’m dreamin’.

    • readerOfTeaLeaves says:

      JohnJ, I think we may be having similar dreams.
      Here’s hoping.

      Never dreamed that I would be such an ardent fan of the FBI.

  27. MadDog says:

    From Chief Idiot Officer Payton’s 3rd attempt to hide the ball declaration:

    Like security specialists elsewhere, between March 2003 and October 2005, OA did not have an established asset management process, which would have included activities such as tracking hard drive assignments within each EOP component.

    Couple points:

    1. Bullshit, Bullshit, Bullshit!

    2. That “security specialists” did or did not have asset management processes is not relevant (and like all of Chief Idiot Officer Payton’s declaration, is meant to “hide the ball” and obscure the real issue). The question is whether the OA had an asset management process, and I can assure you, they fookin’ did!

    3. To substantiate my claim, one only has to use the OA’s own words against themselves. OA claims that they regularly replaced EOP users systems, on a average of 1/3 of the EOP users per annum, as part of a standard process used by zillions of corporations, and also used by the OA.

    For the OA to accomplish this replacement policy, they had to have a list of which computers where assigned to which EOP user!!! That is commonly called an “asset management system”. Doh!!!

    If you have an “asset management system”, then you indeed have the wherewithal to identify which systems are where.

    For the OA to continue to deny that they can’t identify which systems were associated with which users, is a flat-out, bald-faced lie!

    If one were to believe Chief Idiot Officer Payton, one would come to the conclusion that the OA had no idea if the system they replaced for EOP User Jane Doe on Tuesday, wasn’t the system that they had already replaced for EOP User Jane Doe the day before on Monday. Ya, sure! You betcha!

    Which leads me right back to my 1st point: Bullshit, Bullshit, Bullshit!

    • bmaz says:

      Methinks the MadDog went and got placed on Meredith Fuchs’ email list since is now receiving notifications as fast as I do…..

      Good job MD!

    • klynn says:

      Which leads me right back to my 1st point: Bullshit, Bullshit, Bullshit!

      bmaz, don’t you like how MD can boil it down to the bottom line…

      Thank MD!

    • MadDog says:

      And continuing on with Chief Idiot Officer Payton’s 3rd attempt to hide the ball declaration:

      OA does not know what hard drives these 583 individuals used during that timeframe or if the hard drives are still in existence. Accordingly, OA is unable to directly respond to the court’s request for the number of hard drives that were in use between March 2003 and October 2005.

      Couple more points:

      1. Bullshit, Bullshit, Bullshit!

      2. The Judge didn’t ask whether the hard drives were in existence. The Judge ordered the OA to find them!

      3. If I were the Judge, I would be writing up my “Contempt of Court” orders right now! The OA (and their DOJ lackey lawyers) are deliberately defying the Judge’s orders.

      The Judge has ordered the OA to produce stuff, and the OA’s response has been again, “We don’t feel like doing that.”

      I’ve got to think that both CREW and the NS Archive will have blistering responses to this latest WH declaration, and I would bet that both the plaintiffs have as a primary part of their response, a very pointed referral to the WH’s deliberate refusal to obey the Judge’s explicit and specific orders.

      Who’s got the popcorn?

      • WilliamOckham says:

        MadDog,

        I’ve been busy at work today, but thanks for the links. Will start perusing them as soon as I get a deployment process straightened out.

        • bmaz says:

          always worth reading for a hutzpah chuckle; but the thumbnail synopsis is “White House OA to Court: Fuck You”.

  28. Rayne says:

    You know, of all the things we might have guessed would hit the fan before Marcy returned to put her hand to the emptywheel, who would have said an FBI raid on Scott Bloch’s office?

    Last thing I would have expected.

    On the other hand, if they’re just batting cleanup and tidying up his records, we might have said they were doing that across all of DOJ.

    • bmaz says:

      I’ve been working on this for a while now this morning, and it is hard to accurately unpack fully to the point of really getting a bead on what is going on. Best guess is that was the point here….

  29. JohnJ says:

    One gets the impression that the FBI might have been harder to purge of honest people.

    IIRC:
    FBI agent spotted 9/11 before it happened
    FBI is abhorred by “interrogation” techniques.
    FBI goes after OOSC.

    I am thinking they might have a few good people still working there.
    (Had to give something to my ex-agency parents ya’ know’)

    Oops, got to go again. My Dialysis machine just finished booting (Validation testing, not therapy).

    • readerOfTeaLeaves says:

      I’ve started to wonder the same thing.
      And after been lied to by Scooter Libby and Karl Rove, I hope most FBI agents are ‘highly motivated’ to expose and unravel the ‘Six Fingered’ Bush Believers and their neocon pals.

      Would be very fun if the FBI agents got to look some of the ‘Six Fingered’ types in the eye and say,
      “You keep using that wordthose words. I do not think it means they mean what you think it means they mean.”

      Words like ‘computer backups’ and ‘overwrite files’ and ‘delete’.
      You know, everyday normal words.

      Here’s hoping ;-))

    • watercarrier4diogenes says:

      Somewhat O/T: Hadn’t ever seen ‘abhorred’ before so I right-clicked (even on my Mac!) and chose ‘Look up on Answers.com’ for a quick confirmation. Here’s their definition:

      To regard with horror or loathing; detest: “The problem with Establishment Republicans is they abhor the unseemliness of a political brawl” (Patrick J. Buchanan).

      Ghod help me, the kool-aid has even leaked into online dictionaries…

  30. maryo2 says:

    Is the Bloch raid related to Lurita Doan firing? The speed at which she got the boot (not serving until the end of the month) implied that something was coming soon.

    Also, if Bush’s FBI did a raid, then Bush’s DOJ requested it, so that implies that Bloch has some goods on Bush’s Rove. If they bothered to raid Bloch, then he must have something damning on Rove. Everybody except the 10 pukes closest to Bush/Cheney are expendable, so if this move was to protect someone, then that someone has to be one of the roughly ten super-pukes.

    • JohnJ says:

      I still wonder if you can actually “scrub” a hard drive today. They are no longer one-to-one sector mapped and have some pretty sophisticated wear spreading and bad sector remapping algorithms. They do things like hide bad sectors and remap over-used areas of the disk.

      This may get interesting.

  31. brendanx says:

    The naked cowardice of the man, whether on 9-11, or now today, is itself an impeachable offense.

  32. Basharov says:

    Odd that Laura was trotted out to make a foreign policy statement. Has that ever happened before? If I were a betting man, I’d say that the tequila was flowing at last night’s Cinco de Mayo celebration in the White House and that Dubya was too hungover (or drunk) this morning to stumble out to give a statement, especially about a country he’s probably never heard of.

    • readerOfTeaLeaves says:

      The WaPo’s Dan Froomkin reported that this is a first for Laura, who insulted Myanmar by getting all judgmental about Leaders Who Fail To Protect Their People From Storm Damage.

      While you’re at the WaPo, check out Dana Milbank’s item on the irrelevance of Bush at this point; snarky descriptions of profoundly sad, telling details. After scolding Myanmar on human rights, Laura Bush proceeded to talk about Jenna’s wedding.

      (One supposes the surviving Myanmar citizens might be affronted by equating the deaths of 22,000 with Jenna’s wedding, but really — those people shouldn’t be so touchy, now should they?)

      Lady Bird Johnson, Jackie O, Pat Nixon, Betty Ford, and Martha Washington must be rolling in their graves (!).

Comments are closed.