Luckily, Harry Reid has put off the Senate vote on the FISA amendment, because I never finished my series showing that the current amendment will legalize data mining. Man oh man oh man, am I looking forward to meeting the deadline I’m on, celebrating a late Turkey Day with friends this weekend, then going into a blog and bill paying frenzy next Monday.

In the meantime, I direct you to Marty Lederman’s latest post, which notes that as far back as Poppy’s day, they were deliberately obfuscating the purpose of their FISA amendments.

Seventeen years ago, the very first Bush (41)Administration was considering whether to ask Congress for an amendmentto FISA very similar to the one the current Administration is nowseeking. Mary Lawton, the FISA guru within DOJ at the time (shetragically died shortly thereafter), wrote a memo to Daniel Levin in the Deputy’s Office (yes, thatDaniel Levin) discussing why such a proposal might not be such a goodidea. That memo has recently been released under FOIA. (Hat tip toDavid Kris for obtaining it and bringing it to my attention.)

The most important sentence in the memo, I think, is this one, in the penultimate paragraph:

"Itshould also be noted that the proposed amendment to FISA to resolve theNSA problem . . . is certain to be written in such enigmatic terms thatonly those who have been briefed in executive session will understandthem."

Truer words were never written. And that’s why it is,indeed, almost impossible to have a serious, informed legislative andpublic debate about proposed FISA reforms — because the public (andmost legislators) can never be let in on what the amended statute wouldactually do:  it’s secret law. [my emphasis]

I think little details of what the new FISA amendment entails have slipped out here and there. But the fact remains, not all legislators know what they’re doing here, and almost no citizens know what they’re doing. And then there are people like Joe Klein obfuscating what little is know, because he can’t be bothered to read the public documents about the program.

Well, until I return to all this Monday, I’ll leave you with one other passage from the Poppy-era memo.

When FISA was initially considered there were strong dissents opposing its enactment on grounds of separation of powers. The Administrations of Presidents Ford and Carter backed the legislation, however, because of the practical imperative of continuing to collect foreign intelligence in the face of growing resistance from the communications common carriers whose cooperation was essential.

Had Junior asked Poppy, perhaps he wouldn’t have gotten the telecoms into the legal fix they’re currently facing in the first place.